Yes it's the .ini files but the thing is, even if you hire an experienced coder, he might be able to do some things, but I doubt he'll be able to tweak and fix everything in the scripts without some more in depth documentation.
When the platform trainer is out it would be a lot easier to get someone to fix/tweak things. I'm sure even users on the forum will be doing this.
I'm just saying I doubt you will be able to give a coder the .ini file and the .pdf documentation that's available now and say, "ok, fix this". He would probably have to consult with Sven on the more advanced stuff in the script engine, but I doubt Sven has time to be teaching it right now.
Keep in mind I'm a script noobie so I might not have any idea what I'm talking about. :P
I see this thread is already dead! , too bad. I thought that we finally can get GSA SER to be a tier 1 link builder software so we can point it directly to our moneysite and get some high quality links.
I guess we will have to wait to platform trainer then maybe things will be better.
Also up for getting one of my coders in the office to work on platforms full time but I agree with @s4nt0s , the coder will require some back and forth with @Sven (who may not have time) because there are some tricky platforms out there and the documentation needs work.
@mamadou I don't think that hiring a freelancer is a good idea as there will be a number of people on subscriptions and if the remote freelancer drops off the planet and leaves the person taking the subscription $$ scrambling to find and train a new freelancer it could create a downtime of weeks just to get new engine updates..
I have an in-house programmer working on the web2.0 engines (fixes and new ones).
Initially we are just picking random ones that already exist in GSA SER and tweak/fixing them so they work again. This will give us a good understanding of the scripting engine in GSA SER and also an indication of the time it takes to maintain them.
@Sven has agreed to assist us in any scripting related questions (thanks!).
Do you pay someone to manually submit to those lists? I know of no software which can actually submit to that list and get a high percentage.... what am I missing?
I purchased a template package for Zenno, which costs me $12/month and works fine. I can get 40+ blogs created and populated with articles in 10 minutes. It's called ZenBlog.
I've created zenno templates myself in the past and let me tell you something. It's a pain in the arse to update so many templates. I'd rather pay other guys to do it.
I subscribed to your site , if you can do this with a reasonable fee, I will be the first one to buy it and abandon MS and it's expensive monthly fees for good!. But I think you should increase the engines to 50 sites or something since no software on the market will EVER deliver better than 80 % success rate. Also you need to ignore sites that depend a lot on JavaScript since you will suffer from massive fails using a 100% socket software like SER. These sites need a browser based submitter as far as I know. (browser based submitters sucks btw , that's why I love SER ) But this is not a problem since you have plenty of quality sites with no extensive JavaScript.
there are a services/tools which handle 50+ working web2.0 sites. working pretty good with regular updates. no sleeper, i think the software is popular. magicsubmitter +1
i think the real stopper is that most of major web2.0 use recaptcha and besides xrumer there is no captcherbreaker software for this. in conclusion i think web2.0 on a semi-automated base like magicsubmitter is no problem. if it comes to set-and-forget solutions like GSA SER, we need a recaptchabreaking "Captcha Breaker" to really get this thing going. But we wait what the time brings to us with new GSA releases ;Þ.
@mamadou Thanks for the tips.. The reason we want to go with only 25-30 is I want to monitor how much maintenance time and staff are needed to keep them going well.. Start small and grow without promising something we can't deliver.
@hunar Thanks for getting on the mailing list.. I will send out an email to everyone once things are ready
I'm in, I'd put your price up and take this on full time. You'd prob get 50% of GSA users on once you have enough targets, and there's a shitload of user right now
@hungryim Yeah! Its sure is going ahead! Working through the Web2.0 engines (thanks for @Sven for all your help!) and also building an API that will integrate directly with GSA SER so you will always have the latest engines from us without having to do anything
When you guys say instances, these aren't separate licenses, are they? You're just partitioning a VPS and running the same license on one piece of hardware, right?
The API which will be used for delivering the engine updates to SER should be ready for beta testing on the 25th (my API developer is away getting married )
As for the Web2.0 engines, we are working on them on a daily basis and getting a number of them working (some with @Sven's help as there are "undocumented" tricks to his brilliant script engine).
Keep up the good work! I look forward to the results.
@Jamese - will you also be able to put together a list of which ones require a special capcha service and those that we can use CB on? Would be very neat!
@Jamese - are you also able to compile a list of platforms that are not working so we don't enable those until they're fully working? No point enabling platforms that it can't post to!
@GlobalGoogler I am just going off a big excel list of Web2.0's from top to bottom based on PR which some are new and some are not to GSA. I am not sure of all the working/not working web2.0 engines in GSA.
@GlobalGoogler grab the list from @mamadou's post earlier in the thread. Basically we are working from top to bottom (and some added ones) based on PR.
I have tried it. It works OK but is a little buggy and requires quite a bit of manual intervention. What it does well though is to modify the sites by removing the standard welcome post, changing the theme and a few other things like removing standard sidebar links etc.
How are we going to submit multiple Articles to the same web 2.0 account ? does SER allow that in a neat way ? I think you must think of this point very well.
You know that these high quality sites are not meant for a 1 Article submission. I usually submit 10/15 Articles to the same web2.0 account before I move on to a new account.
Comments
When the platform trainer is out it would be a lot easier to get someone to fix/tweak things. I'm sure even users on the forum will be doing this.
I'm just saying I doubt you will be able to give a coder the .ini file and the .pdf documentation that's available now and say, "ok, fix this". He would probably have to consult with Sven on the more advanced stuff in the script engine, but I doubt Sven has time to be teaching it right now.
Keep in mind I'm a script noobie so I might not have any idea what I'm talking about. :P
I guess we will have to wait to platform trainer then maybe things will be better.
!
Thats sounds GREAT!
This is the web 2.0 list I use ...
HTTP://wetpaint.com
HTTP://livejournal.com
HTTP://kazeo.com
HTTP://dailystrength.org
HTTP://posterous.com
HTTP://wallinside.com
HTTP://webs.com
HTTP://xanga.com
HTTP://blogage.de
HTTP://webgarden.com
HTTP://blogetery.com
HTTP://insanejournal.com
HTTP://ontheroad.to
HTTP://quizilla.teennick.com
HTTP://weebly.com
HTTP://blogymate.com
HTTP://fc2.com
HTTP://zimbio.com
HTTP://jimdo.com
HTTP://zoho.com
HTTP://onsugar.com
HTTP://bravenet.com
HTTP://inube.com
HTTP://webnode.com
HTTP://squidoo.com
HTTP://blog.tumblr.com
HTTP://wordpress.com
HTTP://9news.com
HTTP://communitywalk.com
HTTP://soup.io
HTTP://ghanaweb.com
HTTP://newsvine.com
HTTP://ziki.com
HTTP://beep.com
HTTP://blog.bitcomet.com
HTTP://blog.com
HTTP://blogbaker.com
HTTP://edublogs.org
HTTP://hazblog.com
HTTP://iamsport.org
HTTP://jigsy.com
HTTP://mywapblog.com
HTTP://purevolume.com
HTTP://www.metsbook.com
HTTP://academia.edu
HTTP://bcz.com
HTTP://beepworld.de
HTTP://centerblog.net
HTTP://dmusic.com
HTTP://fotki.com
HTTP://jazztimes.com
HTTP://meemi.com
HTTP://modwedding.com
HTTP://myindospace.com
HTTP://nexopia.com
HTTP://novalet.com
HTTP://quietwrite.com
HTTP://rediff.com
HTTP://thomhartmann.com
HTTP://thoughts.com
HTTP://travellerspoint.com
HTTP://weddingwindow.com
HTTP://wikidot.com
HTTP://blinkweb.com
HTTP://yola.com
HTTP://350.com
HTTP://allvoices.com
HTTP://blogspace.fr
HTTP://blogtalkradio.com
HTTP://busythumbs.com
HTTP://citeulike.org
HTTP://devhub.com
HTTP://freeblog.hu
HTTP://hookto.com
Using these sites one can rank ANY keyword he wants.
No matter how competitive they are. Trust me! ; )
Can I add them all in one shot ? Adding them one by one will take a lot of time though.
Magic Submitter can submit to all these sites I posted. ( out of the box w/ no editing/scripting needed )
But it's so expensive 58$ /month ( with 10$ cash back offer on a wso ).
@JAMESE
I subscribed to your site , if you can do this with a reasonable fee, I will be the first one to buy it and abandon MS and it's expensive monthly fees for good!. But I think you should increase the engines to 50 sites or something since no software on the market will EVER deliver better than 80 % success rate. Also you need to ignore sites that depend a lot on JavaScript since you will suffer from massive fails using a 100% socket software like SER. These sites need a browser based submitter as far as I know. (browser based submitters sucks btw , that's why I love SER ) But this is not a problem since you have plenty of quality sites with no extensive JavaScript.
i think the real stopper is that most of major web2.0 use recaptcha and besides xrumer there is no captcherbreaker software for this. in conclusion i think web2.0 on a semi-automated base like magicsubmitter is no problem. if it comes to set-and-forget solutions like GSA SER, we need a recaptchabreaking "Captcha Breaker" to really get this thing going. But we wait what the time brings to us with new GSA releases ;Þ.
How are we going to submit multiple Articles to the same web 2.0 account ? does SER allow that in a neat way ? I think you must think of this point very well.
You know that these high quality sites are not meant for a 1 Article submission. I usually submit 10/15 Articles to the same web2.0 account before I move on to a new account.
Do you mean by clearing the history and launch the project again ? or there is a better/faster way ?