@s4nt0s , I've delete the folder twice still show this error -> Invalid pointer operation
Update:
I found that might cause by one of my old web 2.0 project, which use old serengine web 2.0 engine and built in web 2.0s and new engine.
Here's a way to reduplicated:(this is what I remember)
I ran the old engines first (built 50+ links) than add the new engines to the project, at first it ran with no problem after built more than 100 links, the error start to show.
I just find a way to stop the error msg, but no link build by new engine yet.
@dannyorder - Ok, that's definitely odd. You're the only one reporting this problem at the moment (invalid pointer error) - We'll try to follow your steps to reproduce the error. Thanks for reporting the details.
@antonearn - I'll have to talk to James to see how practical something like that would be to add. Thanks for the suggestion.
@steelbone - Hmm, my last campaign had successful unblog.fr in the verifieds and I just setup a new one with only unblog.fr and I've got about 6 verified so far. This is mailru, 2captcha + private proxies.
Are they awaiting account verification or are you seeing some kind of error message?
1. Always check your emails and proxies are working before starting
2. Don't stop and start the project
3. Always use fresh email accounts, don't reuse them from other projects
Number 2, Don't Stop & Start the project.. It means I stuck and can't stop the project at all? @_@.. After I stop it, I must create new project? For me, it's hard to do..
About email : so we can't use catchallboxes.com for email? >_<........ And I just thought that I didn't need another email anymore.
And I just try it out , I really tired type over and over again the captcha and only a few that registered right. It's weird... I don't even know what's wrong with it. I'm using dedicated proxy, email catchallboxes only though...
some platform never success register and I must type all the captcha over and over @_@..
@akiratoya13, To save both you and @s4nt0s time, which is the only luxury we have in life, please go back and read what's being said about captcha solving and the other stuff you're asking. Thanks!
@antonearn , I'm sorry.. I don't have any intention to waste your time and @s4ntOs time. I just reading the documentation, and that's what it said and just trying my self. Even bought private proxy just to do that.
I found all the answer after reading your reply to me, and try to read from the start. And I don't know why the documentation still said to "Don't stop & start the project".
And actually, I already read this from the start to the end ( page 5 ) because I'm interested to bought this, but my eyes set on web 2.0 that can be made using this. So I'm sorry to miss it when reading, I didn't expect there's already one questioning about it.
I'm sure it's very stable and usable right now, but any idea when it is heading out of beta? Or is it like a Gmail thing and will be beta for quite some time?
@s4nt0s had a good run last week, but the past few days it has dropped way off for me. I am not running the program hard at all. Literally every platform stopped for me across 12 projects.
Do proxies appear to be an issue? I have 25 dedicated private. But am wondering if the platforms end up flagging the proxies at some point during the month and just shut them down?
Also, where is the program pulling targets from? My SER folders (if box is ticked)? Or searching on its own via KW search?
Finally do you have an ETA on adding new platforms?
@viking - I have projects running right now and I just checked one of my latest and so far I have links verified from amped, Bcz, edublogs, FC2, Onesm, Rediff & Wikidot.
If you really aren't getting any verified from any engines across all your projects then I'd say its most likely the proxies. It's possible your proxies were flagged, but hard to say for sure. It does sound like a proxy issue to me though.
About pulling targets, I'm not sure what you mean. These are web 2.0 sites so SER doesn't do any kind of scraping, it signs up on the home page like Wordpress.com, etc.
They've been working on Ning engine and its a bit more tricky then the others. More engines coming soon, but don't have exact ETA.
@s4nt0s hmm. I'm using dedicated proxy and I think it's pretty good.. I use buyproxies. Any chance that it's because of it's email? I'm using rambler.ru email because I still didn't get any mail.ru cheap provider.. Still searching for it.
and, for wordpress, are you sure it's working? I'm not getting any wordpress registered too.. And maybe it's because of the email too? hahaha..
Would it be possible for SER to throw an important error message if all the emails are used for account creation? Something similar to article dupechecking. Like "all the emails are used for wordpress account creation add some new."
Also it would be useful if the log could show which proxies are used for account creation and which ones aren't working for a particular engine. Currently it only says (proxy related issue, please use another one) but doesn't show which one is it.
@s4nt0s thanks. I sorted it. It was my settings, which had the default '5' for max accounts. Duh. Changed the number and working like a champ again. Guess I maxed it out and the software did exactly what it was supposed to do. Thank you. Looking forward to more platforms down the road.
@akiratoya13 - In my project from last night, I had Wordpress verifieds coming in. It seemed like they were some of the last web 2.0's to get verified in my campaign though. Just make sure you let it run long enough to see some come through.
I've personally never tried rambler.ru emails in any of the web 2.0's so I'm not sure if that could be causing a problem or not. You can get mail.ru accounts here if needed for pretty cheap: http://www.blazingseollc.com/account-store/
@TheGypsy - What email and proxy is used is up to SER. If it is rejected by the Web 2.0, SER should automatically retry.
Yes, the next update will work so that the proxy related issues pass back the ip address in the SER log.
I see in the log that SER keeps trying to create accounts with different emails with the error message (sorry that email address is already used). I would like to have a way to know when they are all used for a given engine or at least in the project. This way I would know when to load more emails into the project.
Using deathbycaptcha : 600 captcha solved, but submission only 3 and verified only 17.. I don't know why it is... So, it's too many using captcha and still failed to register.. one that I really often seen is ipernity.. It can get 3 captcha error in 1 time @_@.
@TheGypsy - If you just use the same or more emails than the amount accounts you have it set to create, you shouldn't have that issue at all. I believe the red error message should come up if all emails are used.
@akiratoya13 - The captchas might be from it trying to solve a captcha but it failing to register. If you hover over your API key in SER, you'll see a box pop up and at the bottom there is a support token ID. If you include this in your support ticket, he'll be able to see your logs and where the errors are occurring.
The reason I mentioned this was because I haven't seen it happening yet. I had 10 emails in a wordpress only test project and the only error message I've seen so far is the "No targets to post to (no site list enabled, no url extraction chosen)" But if you say it's already happening then it's cool. In this case can you tell me if SER checks it per project or per engines, please. I mean if I have two engines enabled in a project will SER throw a message after all the emails are used on both engine or it alerts after all the emails are used on one engine?
One more question just to be clear on this. In scheduled posting the " Time to wait on further registration" is per proxy?
@TheGypsy - It's more of a per project, not per engine. If the emails are used up for the entire project I believe you should get an error message. I will double check with everything and let you know for sure.
The "time to wait on further registrations" is just the time it's going to wait before registering on the same web 2.0 again. I'm not sure what you mean per proxy? SER chooses a random proxy but Sven worked on this recently to try and improve this.
Well you have sort of answered the question I guess. I thought it may keep track of which account was created by which proxy and bases the time on individual proxy level.
Comments
My set up is the same as yours
Thanks for the feedback
Something similar to article dupechecking. Like "all the emails are used for wordpress account creation add some new."
Also it would be useful if the log could show which proxies are used for account creation and which ones aren't working for a particular engine. Currently it only says (proxy related issue, please use another one) but doesn't show which one is it.
But if you say it's already happening then it's cool. In this case can you tell me if SER checks it per project or per engines, please.
I mean if I have two engines enabled in a project will SER throw a message after all the emails are used on both engine or it alerts after all the emails are used on one engine?
One more question just to be clear on this. In scheduled posting the " Time to wait on further registration" is per proxy?
Well you have sort of answered the question I guess. I thought it may keep track of which account was created by which proxy and bases the time on individual proxy level.