I use the Incredible Indexer, and a couple people on my team use the Instant Link Indexer. I think all the vendors that offer indexing services here are really good guys, and all have good services. I would take a look at all of them (there are at least three), and make whatever decision is best for you.
@sickaluph - It's a huge difference. Making links means nothing if they are not indexed - as they are invisible as far as ranking goes.
Not more than a few months ago you couldn't get links indexed without paying a lot of money for very few links getting indexed. Now the guys here on the forum offer really nice indexing services for cheap. And they can handle a lot of links.
So do your homework and get on board. It is very important to get your links indexed.
@justice - Sorry I missed your question somehow. It's not so much the amount of indexing but rather how many links you are making per day and how old the website is.
When I run projects, everything goes into indexing - I use several vendors. But everything goes in that day. I don't drip or anything like that.
I control how many links I make - that is the key. And I assume that most will be indexed. So I plan accordingly. Therefore its not about controlling the back-end (the indexing). I control the front-end and everything else takes care of itself.
@steelbone - I used Lindexed for years but dropped them when the boys fired up the indexing services here. After all, Lindexed is a crawling service. I personally would save the $25 per month on that.
He uses multiple services. You can stick in many different API's in the Main Options for multiple indexers. It is more out of choice than necessity. But it isn't a bad strategy - especially if you have more than one VPS or server going.
@justice - These days with G it is very hit or miss (and a lot more miss lately). I always believe in escalation and acceleration of links. You can't really do that if you start big. Plus I am a pretty patient person.
New domains require common sense. New domains don't get a zillion links per day out of the gate. Totally unnatural unless it goes viral. Which is essentially the underpinning of the churn and burn. So I would start at 5-10 per day in week 1, and gradually escalate from there. I honestly believe that is your best chance at making it stick.
I've been using this tiered strategy for awhile without any indexing and have actually had some pretty decent results... so if I start using an indexer my results should be even better?
After looking through some indexers I am not sure which one to go with... is GSA SEO Indexer good enough to get the job done?
@sickaluph - I started with that, but I always had Lindexed going in the background (both are closer to being crawling services in effectiveness to be honest). GSA Indexer is lightning fast, but one issue is that it will suck all of the oxygen out of your internet connection (if you are doing big volumes like me). So if you are using it on the same VPS or server as SER+CB, you are going to cripple the speed of SER.
Having said all that, if I was on a budget and just starting out, and basically had no money, I would get GSA Indexer in a New York second. No hesitation.
However, the internet has gotten a lot bigger, and it is getting very difficult to index backlinks. Much, much more difficult. And you need those backlinks indexed to rank. So I would honestly evaluate all of the index providers and settle in with somebody you are comfortable with.
I try not to recommend any one in particular as it is my position that competition and choices are very important to us as a community. Look at how many problems people have with VPS's and Dedi's. So my feeling is the more choices the better. Let the market sort out the good from the bad. All the indexing guys have happy customers.
That had to be one of the most interesting videos I ever watched in my entire life. I know there is a message in there for me, lol. Seriously, that was very deep. I may not be able to sleep now. I was captivated with every sentence. Wow. Thanks! (and bookmarked)
@ron, you're welcome It also has implications on your list sale - e.g. if you ever though of expanding the number of lists available at the same time (like adding a green list for example) OR if you ever thought of recommending a certain list to people to lower the choices they have to make and as result increase margin (e.g. making the red list more prominent than the blue list or having introduced a third list making one of the three a "most popular"). Ok, sorry, got sidetracked, I'll just stop here before things get out of hand, lol ...
How do you setup the side links in a project. I'm a newbie - I understand using tier 1 links in tier to and tier 2 in tier 3 but I don't understand the diagram with the targets off to the side. I know this is academic to you but can you help me out. How would I set this up?
the only difference between tier 2 links pointing to tier 1 and the sidelinks pointing to tier 1 is that tier 2 is contextual and the side liks of tier 1 are just additional links of other kinds.
@vlalston - The purpose of the diagram was to clearly show you a few things:
1) The contextual tiers are stacked underneath one another and intended to be kept separate from junk
2) People always make the mistake of jumbling (contextuals + junk) in the same tier, and then underneath that they then build junk to junk.
There is never a point in wasting precious resources to build junk to junk. Build contextual to contextual, build junk to contextual - but don't build junk to junk - waste of linkbuilding.
Comments
@sickaluph - It's a huge difference. Making links means nothing if they are not indexed - as they are invisible as far as ranking goes.
Not more than a few months ago you couldn't get links indexed without paying a lot of money for very few links getting indexed. Now the guys here on the forum offer really nice indexing services for cheap. And they can handle a lot of links.
So do your homework and get on board. It is very important to get your links indexed.
@justice - Sorry I missed your question somehow. It's not so much the amount of indexing but rather how many links you are making per day and how old the website is.
When I run projects, everything goes into indexing - I use several vendors. But everything goes in that day. I don't drip or anything like that.
I control how many links I make - that is the key. And I assume that most will be indexed. So I plan accordingly. Therefore its not about controlling the back-end (the indexing). I control the front-end and everything else takes care of itself.
I use lindexed, the incredible indexer and express indexer.....
Help big g find your shit.....
After looking through some indexers I am not sure which one to go with... is GSA SEO Indexer good enough to get the job done?
btw, I'd throw this at you if you haven't seen it already: http://www.ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_on_the_paradox_of_choice
@Ferryman, You are very welcome.
That had to be one of the most interesting videos I ever watched in my entire life. I know there is a message in there for me, lol. Seriously, that was very deep. I may not be able to sleep now. I was captivated with every sentence. Wow. Thanks! (and bookmarked)
@vlalston - The purpose of the diagram was to clearly show you a few things:
1) The contextual tiers are stacked underneath one another and intended to be kept separate from junk
2) People always make the mistake of jumbling (contextuals + junk) in the same tier, and then underneath that they then build junk to junk.
There is never a point in wasting precious resources to build junk to junk. Build contextual to contextual, build junk to contextual - but don't build junk to junk - waste of linkbuilding.