Skip to content

Web 2.0 Updating Services [62 verified successfully]

24567

Comments

  • sorry flixya and opendiary failed actually when I check URL
  • I am happy to test them and send you feedback and results.
  • edited April 2013
    seagul Other are all failed? please check manual, most of link should be there. Some bug exist in verified step in some sites, i am fixing.  it is gsa bug somehow, but i can bypass it. 
  • Happy to help with Beta testing if still required and looking forward to being able to start using the service when you issue payment details.
  • +1, would like to be a tester with pantience to make that better
  • Now I prefer that reputed member to test engine:) sorry for others.
  • Hunar  i have not got message on skype.
  • @awint well I got your PM.  THank you very much I'll give them a good test and i'll report back to you as well. Either through here or on Skype. :)
  • i will check my results today .. but seems at first look like @seagul posted @awint
  • If you need another beta tester then count me in.Thanks
  • edited April 2013
    so first check..
    got @awint web2.0 for:

    verified:

    iamsports.org -> article posted fine
    bravenet.com -> a lot of verified but when i check links i get -> http://pub6.bravenet.com/global/startwizard.php?service=journal&service_name=Blog

    submitted:

    opendiary.com -> (awaiting approval since 02.April)
    bricolog.fr -> gives strange url http://sammiefay.bricoblog.fr/121481" class="date">0 coment/test

    in log window i see alot of:

    02:43:33: [+] 041/169 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.mjdr.org/social/join
    02:43:33: [-] 041/169 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
    02:46:36: [+] 120/196 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.aussiedaytrader.com/submit_article.php?c=24
    02:46:36: [-] 120/196 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
    02:46:36: [+] 241/250 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://cooperancy.com/
    02:46:37: [+] 121/196 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.auctionsdirectory.info/home/
    02:46:37: [-] 121/196 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
    02:46:36: [+] 025/177 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.pwrseo.net
    02:46:37: [-] 025/177 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
    02:46:37: [+] 135/141 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.nataliakills-concours.com/Dir/CarParts/AutoAnything/index.html
    02:46:37: [-] 025/177 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
    02:46:37: [+] 026/177 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - https://wagner.nyu.edu/students/services/graduation.php
    02:46:37: [-] 026/177 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
  • @Awint Are you working on this feature alone?
  • no news here ?
  • There are some bugs i need to sven to fix so that i can go on. right now i fixed 46 web2.0 but many of them can not verified by gsa but links DO been there.

  • hmm ic thx for nfo @awint
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    edited April 2013
    Common bugs to fix? I can not deny that there are bugs...but I can tell you that all web2.0's worked when I or Ozz coded them. And there is no bug in the scripting engine as you say. I have doubts that there is anything not possible with he script language.
  • I do not got you for last sentence, do you mean all are possible with ozz script language or your scrip language?
    gsa are already excellent anyway.
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    I mean that all the engines worked and gave a verified link. Of course on these web2.0's you quickly end up on changing things to keep them working.
  • edited April 2013
    I found one of reason fail to verify is you not put <a href=%url%>%keyword%</a> in article body or others. so you just not submit post links, now all are verified :-)


    @sven, why some of engine can put link automatically, some not?
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de

    hmm what engines don'T put links automatically? You mean your engines?

    If so, make sure you have "veriable must be used=url" is present. This makes sure that if no url was used on that form...it is inserting one on the fields that allow it (auto add anchor url=1|2").

  • if "veriable must be used=url" is present,
    and there is no field use %url%, it seem it stop and not go on.
    "veriable must be used=xxx mean %xxx% must be used at one of field or stop, right?
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de

    check your spelling...it's "variable must be used=url". But yes it stops submission if 

    1. there is no %url% parameter submitted on the form

    2. there is no field that allowed html usage (or "html to bbs/markdown/custom..." conversion) or there is no "auto add url anchor=1 or 2" in the defined field (e.g. [Article] section).

  • I found there are auto add anchor url=1|2 in [Article] in all my web2.0 engine. but there is no variable must be used=url.  but still NO links in post in some/most my updated web2.0 engine.
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    edited April 2013
    the "variable must be used" is for the STEP* sections...and the place where the form to submit is filled.
  • yes. i know. but i mean there is NOT variable must be used=
    could you please reply my question in last above post? thanks.
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    I thought I did that already! thanks.
  • i do not understand, anyone?
  • Hey Awint,

    I don't mean to be offensive though. But I recommend that you try to find someone who can speak both English & your native language to help you here. It will be much easier to communicate this way. And it will save you and save Sven a lot of time. Good luck.
  • edited April 2013
    Ok, sven is not english speaker too :-)

    Ok, I fixed my web2.0 , now 46 engine all are verified now.   Need a few of beta test , please pm me.
  • spunko2010spunko2010 Isle of Man
    I will beta test :)
Sign In or Register to comment.