It has about 45 platforms of which about 40 end up working, but you have
to keep going back and manually posting new stuff as there isn't a true scheduler option which is why Rankwyz and Magic Submitter are still better as one page Web2.0 don't cut it any more.
so my standalone web2.0 tool still worth to develop. how many do you think i can sell if it support 50+ platform and solve most import problem current ones have?
@awint it's worth it, but you have to be cheaper or better than what is available
Single post web2.0 don't carry as much value anymore and are a clear indicator/footprint, so you'll need to have some sort of scheduler, so ppl can build up posts
So if you could produce something that creates the web2.0, is maintained i.e. updates when the web2.0's do and allows scheduling, you're on to a winner.
Would you do monthly fee or upfront price and what would they be?
Schedule is a basic feature. monthly fee will keep services up to day. we will update daily.
And I was curious to see if anyone would like to be involved in some of the conception, development, marketing or/and cooperation somehow. Please pm me if you are interested.
rankwyz did this, and there's other sellers already. Most developers could care less about updating because they don't have time 24/7 to be doing that.
Unless you have a strong team, I would advice against it, some sites can detect automation and need emulation.
@cloudattack you mean most developer do not like to update their tool? if so most tool will not function soon so theu will disapear soon. is that what they want? i know some sites can detect robot, we try to avoid it. if you have experience with it, can we talk about it?
@awint you would need to be using the tool on daily basis, if you expect to make anyone use it daily.
Reason being is, a lot of times, these web2.0 sites will know you are automating it and change up their code to stop automation. This is all done randomly, and they are very good at it.
I can't see this tool working out unless, you are using it yourself 24/7 so you can debug fast and send fast updates.
@awint the problem with you is that you came to this forum with building your own tool in mind. Than you said maybe later, than you said you will do this service, than this ranking website, now again your own tool.
I just don't feel it is worth it with this constant up and down. With serengines.com it was completely different. Even though they bugged me a lot with questions on the scripting part, I soon realized they have the knowledge by now and build there own engines (instead of taking mine and fixing them). They check there engines and fix them asap. Something I would not count on when buying your tool or service. Sorry, just had to say this.
@Sven, Thanks for your reply. I came to this forum because I have GSA ser, for 3 license. I use it a lot. I having do seo for years. we have a team here, it is totally ok to do gsa engines services and same time,. we do several business. I total understand your concern, I respect what you decide.
What is the price that you plan to release this for?
Also can you post a full list of currently support Web 2.0 sites (real, unique, high PR sites, not footprints) and do you really plan to support them daily?
Comments
how many do you think i can sell if it support 50+ platform and solve most import problem current ones have?
Single post web2.0 don't carry as much value anymore and are a clear indicator/footprint, so you'll need to have some sort of scheduler, so ppl can build up posts
So if you could produce something that creates the web2.0, is maintained i.e. updates when the web2.0's do and allows scheduling, you're on to a winner.
Would you do monthly fee or upfront price and what would they be?
Are you going for a standalone version or still waiting to get API access from @sven?
Are you trying to do something like what SEREngines is but making it standalone? I think that would be a great idea.
@awint the problem with you is that you came to this forum with building your own tool in mind. Than you said maybe later, than you said you will do this service, than this ranking website, now again your own tool.
I just don't feel it is worth it with this constant up and down. With serengines.com it was completely different. Even though they bugged me a lot with questions on the scripting part, I soon realized they have the knowledge by now and build there own engines (instead of taking mine and fixing them). They check there engines and fix them asap. Something I would not count on when buying your tool or service. Sorry, just had to say this.
What is the price that you plan to release this for?
Also can you post a full list of currently support Web 2.0 sites (real, unique, high PR sites, not footprints) and do you really plan to support them daily?
As per @Rodol
I'd also like the choice of posting an article so many times per blog or per network
Regards