seagul Other are all failed? please check manual, most of link should be there. Some bug exist in verified step in some sites, i am fixing. it is gsa bug somehow, but i can bypass it.
There are some bugs i need to sven to fix so that i can go on. right now i fixed 46 web2.0 but many of them can not verified by gsa but links DO been there.
Common bugs to fix? I can not deny that there are bugs...but I can tell you that all web2.0's worked when I or Ozz coded them. And there is no bug in the scripting engine as you say. I have doubts that there is anything not possible with he script language.
I found one of reason fail to verify is you not put <a href=%url%>%keyword%</a> in article body or others. so you just not submit post links, now all are verified :-)
@sven, why some of engine can put link automatically, some not?
hmm what engines don'T put links automatically? You mean your engines?
If so, make sure you have "veriable must be used=url" is present. This makes sure that if no url was used on that form...it is inserting one on the fields that allow it (auto add anchor url=1|2").
if "veriable must be used=url" is present, and there is no field use %url%, it seem it stop and not go on. "veriable must be used=xxx mean %xxx% must be used at one of field or stop, right?
check your spelling...it's "variable must be used=url". But yes it stops submission if
1. there is no %url% parameter submitted on the form
2. there is no field that allowed html usage (or "html to bbs/markdown/custom..." conversion) or there is no "auto add url anchor=1 or 2" in the defined field (e.g. [Article] section).
I found there are auto add anchor url=1|2 in [Article] in all my web2.0 engine. but there is no variable must be used=url. but still NO links in post in some/most my updated web2.0 engine.
I don't mean to be offensive though. But I recommend that you try to find someone who can speak both English & your native language to help you here. It will be much easier to communicate this way. And it will save you and save Sven a lot of time. Good luck.
Comments
got @awint web2.0 for:
verified:
iamsports.org -> article posted fine
bravenet.com -> a lot of verified but when i check links i get -> http://pub6.bravenet.com/global/startwizard.php?service=journal&service_name=Blog
submitted:
opendiary.com -> (awaiting approval since 02.April)
bricolog.fr -> gives strange url http://sammiefay.bricoblog.fr/121481" class="date">0 coment/test
in log window i see alot of:
02:43:33: [+] 041/169 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.mjdr.org/social/join
02:43:33: [-] 041/169 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
02:46:36: [+] 120/196 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.aussiedaytrader.com/submit_article.php?c=24
02:46:36: [-] 120/196 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
02:46:36: [+] 241/250 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://cooperancy.com/
02:46:37: [+] 121/196 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.auctionsdirectory.info/home/
02:46:37: [-] 121/196 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
02:46:36: [+] 025/177 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.pwrseo.net
02:46:37: [-] 025/177 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
02:46:37: [+] 135/141 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - http://www.nataliakills-concours.com/Dir/CarParts/AutoAnything/index.html
02:46:37: [-] 025/177 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
02:46:37: [+] 026/177 matches engine awint_opendiary.com - https://wagner.nyu.edu/students/services/graduation.php
02:46:37: [-] 026/177 no form at all - http://www.opendiary.com/startnew.asp
gsa are already excellent anyway.
@sven, why some of engine can put link automatically, some not?
hmm what engines don'T put links automatically? You mean your engines?
If so, make sure you have "veriable must be used=url" is present. This makes sure that if no url was used on that form...it is inserting one on the fields that allow it (auto add anchor url=1|2").
and there is no field use %url%, it seem it stop and not go on.
"veriable must be used=xxx mean %xxx% must be used at one of field or stop, right?
check your spelling...it's "variable must be used=url". But yes it stops submission if
1. there is no %url% parameter submitted on the form
2. there is no field that allowed html usage (or "html to bbs/markdown/custom..." conversion) or there is no "auto add url anchor=1 or 2" in the defined field (e.g. [Article] section).
could you please reply my question in last above post? thanks.
I don't mean to be offensive though. But I recommend that you try to find someone who can speak both English & your native language to help you here. It will be much easier to communicate this way. And it will save you and save Sven a lot of time. Good luck.
Ok, I fixed my web2.0 , now 46 engine all are verified now. Need a few of beta test , please pm me.