Skip to content

Who really want the WEB 2.0 working properly?

1456810

Comments

  • I am waiting JAMESE reply, i do not want reinvent the wheel.
  • it seem I need to work with sven to get this done, some update need sven change the code of GSA.
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    common nothing has to be changed on the code! Learn the script language better and you can do almost anything with it.
  • edited March 2013
    Nvm, Looks like it's coming soon. :)
  • JamesJames SEREngines.com
    Hi @Hunar

    Tightening up some of the engines trying to add as much user profile and extra data as possible to make the web2.0's stick and look more natural.

    Also moved serengines.com to a bigger server last week to get ready for the launch, that is possibly why you saw the main website down.. It is all good now :)
  • edited March 2013
    Wow Senuke is in danger.

    Or not.

    Senuke has this extra thing that it has many custom coded web 2.0 sites. Now this service could fill the gap between Senuke and GSA.
  • AlexRAlexR Cape Town
    Can someone explain the following to me? 

    I'd like to create 15 different web2.0's and place a new article on them every week. Will this new service be able to do this?
  • I think that is what it can do... but the question is when....
  • “Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet(edit: hopefully!).”
    ― Aristotle
  • I already fix some of them, where can i upload it so that you can test it?

  • just share it here, maybe a dropbox link, or whatever...
  • edited March 2013
    here is link to 14 fixed web2.0  http://www71.zippyshare.com/v/51777553/file.html
    password is awint. it will create a new category  "web2.0 fixed" at project window so you can easily to test.
    before you test with this, plz test if origin web2.0 work or not.  please give me feedback if it work you there.
  • **Thumbs UP**
    i will test them later.
  • Great work awint, just tested - forgot to debug tho, sorry :)

    Working for me (manual captcha):
    revelife.com/weblog/ - verified
    ireallylikefood.com/weblog/ - verified
    lovelyish.hk/weblog/ - verified
    healthkicker.com/weblog/ - verified
    lovelyish.com/weblog/ - verified
    www.flixya.com/ (submits succ., but cant verify the link)
    doggyblogg.se/ (submits succ., but cant verify the link)

    Not posting articles, but registration works well:
    http://datingish.hk - registered, but no article posted
    momaroo.com/weblog/ - registered, but no article posted
    xanga.com/ - registered, but no article posted

    Registration failed/unknown:
    http://www.black.hk/register.aspx - Didn't register
    http://www.weeklyvolcano.com/signup/ - Didn't register
    http://www.datingish.com/register.aspx - Didn't register
    https://my.opera.com/community/signup/ - Didn't register
  • @awint - seems like your service might be closer to launch :)
  • great work @awint testing them too !
  • Unfortunately @JAMASE said this week [hopefully] his service will be launched. Apparently not even some updates.
  • edited March 2013
    Thanks for you guys test especially @mmtj
    Congraduate JAMASE launch his services this week. :-) I just add some competition to it so that you guys get better services. 
  • Anyway you guys can work together rather than compete, I cannot see myself paying for two extra services?

    Great this is getting closer.
  • So can anyone explain how to load these web2.0s up into GSA or is there a forum post that explains this? Cheers all!
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @Insane - Go to your installation directory where GSA SER is installed and there should be a folder called "engines". That's where you put the .ini files.
  • edited March 2013
    @Ibsane ... stop GSA SER put files into engine folder (overwrite) and restart GSA SER
    Then you find Fixed-Web2.0 platform inside SER .. thanks to @awint
  • Great, thanks for the quick replies.
  • One more @KayKay or @s4nt0s - should I delete the current engines in the folder? or when i choose Web2.0 in SER I should only 'check' the ones that i've uploaded..?
  • Yes, overwrite old engines
  • Thanks @s4nt0s and @ KayKay for instructions
  • keep in mind that when you update SER it will overwrite the engine so you need to replace it on every update unless @sven take the ones shared here and add it to the program updates.
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @rodol - Or you can just rename the engines and the new added engines you want to keep and they won't get overwritten during update.
  • #-o of course
  • Or copy the entire engine folder as a backup , then you can feel free to change the file in engine folder without any risk.
Sign In or Register to comment.