New Headless Update + 19 New High Authority Social Profile Engines Released
Make sure to update to the latest headless version before running the new engines. Stop your projects and restart SER to update to latest headless version. (headless will update when projects are started again)
Details on new social engines below:
Includes full profile information, profile image and some anchor text based backlinks where available otherwise it is a url based backlink.
Use a mix of emails (inbox.eu, mailru and catchalls), requires 2captcha (to solve recaptcha v2)
Congrats to you guys, I am loving serev2 more and more thanks to you adding new engines constantly.
There is a small issue, gsa will often add in my verified list the url "notehub/new", not a big deal because re-verification will fail and it will be removed. So it is a small bug at worst.
Is there a way to reuse accounts created in one project in another one? Lets say I create a project for keyword "kw1", if I enable posting on same site, I will get many backlink from same subdomain to my target domain1. Which is not the best for SEO I think. Now If I could just post 1 backlink on this subdomain and then use it in another project to create another backlink for "kw2" to target domain2 that would be great. So every subdomain will have backlinks to different target domains.
Ideally it would be great if this was integrated in gsa and we don't need to export/import, but something like "share with project(s)". it would save us captcha credits too
@xnseo - I'll let James know about the notehub. Regarding the account sharing, I think that's a great idea and will have to talk to Sven about something like that since this would be handled by SER and not SERE. Currently the only way is to export/import account data to another project, but a button to easily import it would make it better.
@54shagua - No official video tutorial yet but I will send you something that should help.
Hello @s4nt0s I found some bug with SERE. I added 1 email account for each campaign (Maximum account per site is 1) but SER create for me 2 accounts on the same website at the same time. I don't know why and how SER create it (1 email account for 2 different profiles). When I log in to check this. It didn't use the email I input to register. SER used @aol , @yahoo, @gmx.de Found bug on Storify.com,disquis.com,psu.edu..
@xnseo - James made a little tweak to the notehub engine. It should not add links like that again to the verified.
@joseallen : Some web2.0 engines don't require email verification so a randomly generated one is used.
Also sometimes the Scheduled Posting within SER "Max accounts to create" isn't entirely accurate and it might create another account by accident.
@londonseo : yes we block email providers that aren't allowed on the web2.0, for example if a catchall isn't allowed and we have already blocked it in the script, SER should check for other email providers in the project.
One questions though. If we slow down the process of doing just web 2.0 with SERE, is it possible that one email account will be enough for all the 31 sites listed in the SEREngines?
Just a thought though. I am looking ahead to achieve 100% successful ratio for the web 2.0 sites in SEREngines. Am I aiming too high? Just experimenting at the moment though. Using solid private proxies and 2captcha.
@joseallen : That would probably be a feature request for @Sven
@mindlesswizard : Are you using just a catchall? Because rediff dont accept catchalls..
Regarding using just one email address, no that would be impossible because some web2.0s dont accept catchalls, some dont accept mailru and some don't accept inbox.eu. So a mix of email providers is always the best.
Regarding 100% success rate, there are sometimes outside variables which will stop 100% success rate with any submitter. The best thing to do is to have a good retry amount set and use scheduled posting.
An example of outside variables which can cause a web2.0 to fail are:
Site is having server issues
Site doesn't take new registrations or submissions temporarily
Proxies are having a temp issue (happen to me several times today) or are not fresh and are banned from the web2.0
Not enough email accounts loaded up in the project, or reusing emails from other projects. In some cases I have seen emails sold online being sold to many people. So its best to use our email creator to get a few hundred emails ready for your projects.
2captcha is overloaded (happened a few times this week where they would just timeout in their replies to recaptcha v2)
---------------------------------------------
3 New Web 2.0 Engines Released Today!
Bravenet (Picks a random theme, removes default posts) Captcha - Recaptcha v2 (2captcha) Email Accepted - All (including catchall)
Jigsy (Picks a random theme, removes default posts) Captcha - Recaptcha v2 (2captcha) Email Accepted - All (including catchall)
Thanks @S4nt0s for the quick reply.
1) Have you filled out all the project inputs? Like Blog Name and Blog Tagline? This errors means it doesn't have data to input.
Yes because GSA SER won't proceed ahead with out filling these.
2) Regarding using just one email address, no that would be impossible because some web2.0s dont accept catchalls, some dont accept mailru and some don't accept inbox.eu. So a mix of email providers is always the best.
I got this. I actually used just 3 email build on custom domain name and had successfully verified with 14 web 2.0 provided I used the same project (previously only 2 verified) this time using 2captcha.
Regarding the email creater, is there any video tutorial on how that works? I don't have a clue how it works. I can try it on my own but a tutorial will be great to save my time.
Also one question, if I were supposed to create unlimited web 2.0 ( repeat the same web 2.0 sites) with different contents but pointing to the same site how can I set it up?
Let's say if I added 50 ( email accounts mixed up as you suggested ) and solid private proxies ... will GSA automatically repeat building the new 2.0 with in the same platforms?
Your feed back will be highly appreciated.
@mindlesswizard - Sorry you beat me before I could update the post as I looked into it a little further.. Are you using just a catchall? Because rediff dont accept catchalls..
Even 14 verified Web 2.0's isn't much, you should be doing much better than that. I advise using the email creator engines for mail.ru and inbox.eu to make some emails, then drop a few of those into each project.
Regarding "I used the same project (previously only 2 verified) this time using 2captcha. ".. Using the same project is never a good idea because SER has a queue, once the web2.0 has failed enough times (due to you not having 2captcha on there before), it may not retry.. I suggest a fresh project, using scheduled posting and set it to something like Max 5 accounts and X amount of posts.
If you added 50 email accounts, you would only get a max 50 accounts on some web2.0s. Also to set this up you would use Scheduled Posting
Here's an example:
SER will keep retrying until it reaches the amount of web2.0 accounts and posts your desire (within reason... a few retries might tell SER to give up on that web2.0)
Inside that tutorial is a link to download a options template which you can just import into SER and the options are configured for you. Then you would just adjust the scheduled posting settings to how many accounts you want to create, etc.
Great! Regarding the "I used the same project (previously only 2 verified) this time using 2captcha. " ... I was just checking if things would get better with 2captcha and it actually did.
Going to do a fresh start tomorrow with mix of emails.
thanks for replying back so quick
How many email account do you suggest to have at least 100 verified web 2.0 sites for a single project? Just an estimation.
@mindlesswizard - It depends on how many unique web 2.0's you create. For example, if I was going to create 100 wordpress accounts, I would need 100 different emails. That's because I'm creating 100 accounts on the same domain (wordpress.com). Each unique registration to Wordpress.com needs its own email.
SERE currently has 36 different web 2.0's so if you were to set "maximum accounts per site" to 5, then its going to try and create 5 unique accounts on each one of those 36 web 2.0's.
So 5 (accounts per site) x 36 web 2.0's = 315 unique web 2.0 accounts (if all were successful) So if you were only looking for 100 unique accounts, I'd probably set maximum accounts to 3 and see how that goes. There will of course be some failures.
You only need to add as many emails as the number you set in "accounts per site" so if you set it to 5, you technically need to add 5 unique emails, but keep in mind you want to have a mix because some web 2.0's don't accept certain email providers while others do. For me, I'd throw in 5 mail.ru, 5 inbox.eu and my catchalls. I usually add a few extra of each email type, just to be sure.
Thanks @s4nt0s !! Sorry I was being stupid with my questions when I clearly know that with one email it is just one unique account per web 2.0 site.
So with 1 email account (assuming it works for all web 2.0) we can have 36 different accounts on 36 different web 2.0 sites.
Now the last question is
1 mail.ru 1 inbox.eu 1 custom domain email.
Let assume that the custom domain email is accepted by 34 web 2.0 sites but not by 2 other sites. So GSA will use any of the 2 ( mail.ru or inbox.eu) to create account on the last 2 accounts right? Or, using the 2 email accounts it will try to create accounts on all the other web 2.0 sites on which the 1st email worked already.
Out of topic but yeah as I was checking my project with SEREngines ... I was wondering how if you could add an option for tumblr. Tumblr is already there but for expired tumblr accounts.
1) Use keywords to find tumblr accounts 2) Check for expired accounts 3) Register and then use them since expired tumblr accounts have some solid backlinks pointing to them.
I don't know if this is possible but that could be a kill though
@mindlesswizard - Yes you can use ranges like that for scheduled posting. Also, you can click on the word "minutes" and it will change to hours/days.
The tumblr expired accounts idea is a good one. I will look into that and see if we can do things like that within SER + SERE. Are there any other expire accounts web2.0s platforms which would work too?
-------------
New Engine: Jimdo (picks a random theme, removes default content) Captcha: None Email Accepted: Any
@mindlesswizard - That's because each post on a web 2.0 gets verified as well. Right click on the project > show URLS > verified. Look in the URL column and you can see all the verified links.
This is my campaign I started earlier today. Project is still running ...
I have it set to maxmimum 3 accounts per site, maximum posts per account (6+-2)
Loaded 5 catchalls, 5 mail.ru, 5 inbox.eu into the project.
@mindlesswizard - Skyrock does that. If you click on the URL and look for your link in the post, you will see it will redirect you to your URL. Tumblr does something similar.
When you said Skyrock does that, I didn't understand what you are exactly talking about .
So I have total of 687 verified urls because I have multiple post on the web 2.0 accounts from 2-5. Am I right? So GSA SER treats each url and adds them to the verified list?
It may be the case why I am getting that 687 urls verified .
Also, How do you set up the articles. Because you don't want all of the post in the same account to point to your same site right? I should have think about it before.
You settings "maximum posts per account (6+-2)" how does it work?
Hi @s4nt0s,
Thank you for the update on notehub.
Do you think it will be possible to have a mode where we only create the web 2.0? instead of creating and posting just like the email creator.
After creating web 2.0, we can export them (or they can be automatically exported just like the email creator) and then import them in other projects.
That would be a simple solution to help us create web 2.0 that have only one backlink to each target. The web 2.0 will be automatically shared among many projects.
This can have some disadvantage but at least the option is there.
Best
@xnseo - Regarding a mode to create accounts only and output to file, that would be something @Sven would need to implement. Something like: [x] create accounts only, SER would then only do the REGISTER and LOGIN steps.
@luca.vi - Look in the options tab. There is an option called "Re-verify existing backlinks every x minutes" which I think should remove the dead URLs.
@s4nt0s I'm providing my own sub-domain names and some of the engines like Tumblr are changing them to be at least 12 characters long. sven said it is an option in the engines files - yes its in engine itself. you need to un-comment "max lenght=...".
Have you or anyone else tested if SEREngines works with sandboxed browsers like Firefox with Sandboxie?
As I understand, your program requires the use of a browser session or two.
Also, do I need additional licenses for Sven's program, to use all three of the SEREngines licenses, or do all three licensed copies of SEREngines run concurrently, along with a single GSA-SER install?
@s4nt0s it doesn't look like that is working right. It shows successful and listed in the verified urls but when you go to the page it shows not found. It is trying to create the exact sub domain though.
@Deeeeeeee : SEREngines uses its own custom browser and doesn't require the use of the one installed on your system.
Each SEREngine license runs on a seperate computer, meaning you will also need a copy of GSA SER on each computer and the appropriate licensing for it. A SEREngines license is generated on the website as a API key.
@Dab : Yes, others are currently being done and will be out today. Also just pushed another update for Tumblr, found the issue with Blog Subdomain Name.
@dab was coming to post the same thing. After importing accounts would be nice to have the option not to create new accounts on a project level.
Also @s4nt0s is it possible to update the dofollow/nofollow attribute of each engine? right now all engines are marked as dofollow and we cannot use the right click and "uncheck all engines with no follow" for example.
Also it is very difficult to get bcz, miarroba and overblog to register. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Contrary to other engines like wordpress or tumblr for example where it just works. I think canalblog too is the same but they keep deleting my web 2.0 so I don't try anymore lol
I am seeing messages that tumblr is in the online blacklist and ser is not posting to my created web 2.0. I guess there are some subdomains that appears there and ser is only considering the root domains? Which is not correct.
I created a project only to create web 2.0 accounts so I set it up with a default article and no link (only 1 article per account). After that I exported the accounts and imported them in another project so that I could post to those accounts. I also set up the project with 1 accounts per site so that it doesnt create new ones and only use the existing ones. Imported all emails to the new project too (I am not sure if this is necessary though). Again all imported accounts were created with sere in another project, I didn't manually create any of them of buy. The imported accounts were all exported with SER too.
wordpress got a suspension. I think this is due to connecting with different ips to the same accounts. Would be nice that with SERE account data also include proxy used to create the account (available in exporting and importing). When submitting a new article, if the proxy used to create the account is not available we could just ignore this account and not post there (this could be an option and is useful for people that changes proxies every month)
over-blog is very sensitive to proxies, some works, some don't. Meaning that if a valid proxy was used to create an account and then another (not valid for overblog) is used, it will fail. Binding proxy to account data for creation/submission will also help here.
12:12:21: [-] 006/868 login failed (there was a problem with your username / password combination. please try again.) - http://www.purevolume.com/login
@Xnseo : This happened when you imported the accounts for a post only? Where did you create the account? Another SER Project?
As for using the same proxy for registration, login and submit. SER already does this, but not sure for imported accounts like you are trying to do (@Sven??)
@s4nt0s what do you mean by "for a post only"?
What I did is create a project in ser where I setup to post only one article per account and create multiple accounts per site. This is like an account creator for SERE with a default article.
I got something like 500 accounts with different engines (only dofollow) and I then exported those accounts in a file.
Next I created another ser project, checked the right SERE engine and imported the accounts (with target urls) that I created previously. In scheduling I also setup to create only 1 account (actually I put 0 but ser changed it to 1) per site to avoid creating new accounts.
Looking at the logs, it seems like the web 2.0 logins are wrong, maybe a bug in exporting/importing because I never saw those errors when creating and submitting in the same project.
@Xnseo : When you setup the initial project (account creator) which did only 1 post, this was successful right? (I suspect it would have been otherwise it should not have saved the account if).
If so, I think there is something up with the export and import because most of your issues are LOGIN* based issues which I can ensure you there is nothing wrong with these web2.0s engines (I checked only a few hours ago).
As this is a SER thing, I will have to dig deeper and talk with Sven about this.
Comments
New Headless Update + 19 New High Authority Social Profile Engines Released
Make sure to update to the latest headless version before running the new engines. Stop your projects and restart SER to update to latest headless version. (headless will update when projects are started again)
Details on new social engines below:
Includes full profile information, profile image and some anchor text based backlinks where available otherwise it is a url based backlink.
Use a mix of emails (inbox.eu, mailru and catchalls), requires 2captcha (to solve recaptcha v2)
High Authority Social Profiles
Adobe
Github
Ted
Discus
Goodreads
Slashdot
Houzz
Calameo
Storify
Mixcloud
Codeacademy
Vimeo
Yelp
High Authority Social Profiles (EDU)
Mit.edu
More coming soon.Collegian.psu.edu
Icsi.edu
Buffalostate.edu
Harvard.edu
Wayne.edu
Congrats to you guys, I am loving serev2 more and more thanks to you adding new engines constantly.
There is a small issue, gsa will often add in my verified list the url "notehub/new", not a big deal because re-verification will fail and it will be removed. So it is a small bug at worst.
Is there a way to reuse accounts created in one project in another one?
Lets say I create a project for keyword "kw1", if I enable posting on same site, I will get many backlink from same subdomain to my target domain1. Which is not the best for SEO I think. Now If I could just post 1 backlink on this subdomain and then use it in another project to create another backlink for "kw2" to target domain2 that would be great. So every subdomain will have backlinks to different target domains.
Ideally it would be great if this was integrated in gsa and we don't need to export/import, but something like "share with project(s)". it would save us captcha credits too
Thanks
@54shagua - No official video tutorial yet but I will send you something that should help.
I found some bug with SERE.
I added 1 email account for each campaign (Maximum account per site is 1) but SER create for me 2 accounts on the same website at the same time. I don't know why and how SER create it (1 email account for 2 different profiles).
When I log in to check this. It didn't use the email I input to register. SER used @aol , @yahoo, @gmx.de
Found bug on Storify.com,disquis.com,psu.edu..
@joseallen : Some web2.0 engines don't require email verification so a randomly generated one is used.
Also sometimes the Scheduled Posting within SER "Max accounts to create" isn't entirely accurate and it might create another account by accident.
@londonseo : yes we block email providers that aren't allowed on the web2.0, for example if a catchall isn't allowed and we have already blocked it in the script, SER should check for other email providers in the project.
For normal SER use, catchalls work pretty well.
Just a small ideas, Can you add a "Pause" chosen in "Email verification" tab?
@s4nt0s "Unable to fill variable with content" What does this error mean? Can you share your insights?
Just a thought though. I am looking ahead to achieve 100% successful ratio for the web 2.0 sites in SEREngines. Am I aiming too high? Just experimenting at the moment though. Using solid private proxies and 2captcha.
@joseallen : That would probably be a feature request for @Sven
@mindlesswizard : Are you using just a catchall? Because rediff dont accept catchalls..
Regarding using just one email address, no that would be impossible because some web2.0s dont accept catchalls, some dont accept mailru and some don't accept inbox.eu. So a mix of email providers is always the best.
Regarding 100% success rate, there are sometimes outside variables which will stop 100% success rate with any submitter. The best thing to do is to have a good retry amount set and use scheduled posting.
An example of outside variables which can cause a web2.0 to fail are:
- Site is having server issues
- Site doesn't take new registrations or submissions temporarily
- Proxies are having a temp issue (happen to me several times today) or are not fresh and are banned from the web2.0
- Not enough email accounts loaded up in the project, or reusing emails from other projects. In some cases I have seen emails sold online being sold to many people. So its best to use our email creator to get a few hundred emails ready for your projects.
- 2captcha is overloaded (happened a few times this week where they would just timeout in their replies to recaptcha v2)
---------------------------------------------3 New Web 2.0 Engines Released Today!
Bravenet (Picks a random theme, removes default posts)
Captcha - Recaptcha v2 (2captcha)
Email Accepted - All (including catchall)
Jigsy (Picks a random theme, removes default posts)
Captcha - Recaptcha v2 (2captcha)
Email Accepted - All (including catchall)
Wallinside
Captcha - None
Email - Randomly Generated (email not required)
Even 14 verified Web 2.0's isn't much, you should be doing much better than that. I advise using the email creator engines for mail.ru and inbox.eu to make some emails, then drop a few of those into each project.
Regarding "I used the same project (previously only 2 verified) this time using 2captcha. ".. Using the same project is never a good idea because SER has a queue, once the web2.0 has failed enough times (due to you not having 2captcha on there before), it may not retry.. I suggest a fresh project, using scheduled posting and set it to something like Max 5 accounts and X amount of posts.
If you added 50 email accounts, you would only get a max 50 accounts on some web2.0s. Also to set this up you would use Scheduled Posting
Here's an example:
SER will keep retrying until it reaches the amount of web2.0 accounts and posts your desire (within reason... a few retries might tell SER to give up on that web2.0)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Setting up an email project is extremely easy
Here's a quick tutorial I put together: SERE Email Creator Tutorial
Inside that tutorial is a link to download a options template which you can just import into SER and the options are configured for you. Then you would just adjust the scheduled posting settings to how many accounts you want to create, etc.
Going to do a fresh start tomorrow with mix of emails.
thanks for replying back so quick
How many email account do you suggest to have at least 100 verified web 2.0 sites for a single project? Just an estimation.
SERE currently has 36 different web 2.0's so if you were to set "maximum accounts per site" to 5, then its going to try and create 5 unique accounts on each one of those 36 web 2.0's.
So 5 (accounts per site) x 36 web 2.0's = 315 unique web 2.0 accounts (if all were successful) So if you were only looking for 100 unique accounts, I'd probably set maximum accounts to 3 and see how that goes. There will of course be some failures.
You only need to add as many emails as the number you set in "accounts per site" so if you set it to 5, you technically need to add 5 unique emails, but keep in mind you want to have a mix because some web 2.0's don't accept certain email providers while others do. For me, I'd throw in 5 mail.ru, 5 inbox.eu and my catchalls. I usually add a few extra of each email type, just to be sure.
So with 1 email account (assuming it works for all web 2.0) we can have 36 different accounts on 36 different web 2.0 sites.
Now the last question is
1 mail.ru
1 inbox.eu
1 custom domain email.
Let assume that the custom domain email is accepted by 34 web 2.0 sites but not by 2 other sites. So GSA will use any of the 2 ( mail.ru or inbox.eu) to create account on the last 2 accounts right? Or, using the 2 email accounts it will try to create accounts on all the other web 2.0 sites on which the 1st email worked already.
This could be my last question though
Thanks you
Yes if an email type doesn't work, it tries to use an alternative email type to create the failed account.
Time to wait on further registrations : 5-10 minutes
Time to wait before first post : 5-10 minute
Can I assign the value in that way?
Thanks
1) Use keywords to find tumblr accounts
2) Check for expired accounts
3) Register and then use them since expired tumblr accounts have some solid backlinks pointing to them.
I don't know if this is possible but that could be a kill though
The tumblr expired accounts idea is a good one. I will look into that and see if we can do things like that within SER + SERE. Are there any other expire accounts web2.0s platforms which would work too?
-------------
New Engine: Jimdo (picks a random theme, removes default content)
Captcha: None
Email Accepted: Any
weebly too. Expired weebly accounts are hard to find than tumblr. But if that happens ... that will be GOLD!!
May be if that is not possible then at least just finding out expired tumblr or weebly accounts and listing them.
I tested the SEREngines with 15 different emails and now I have 687 verified links. Successfully submitted and verified to 28 different web 2.0 sites.
Isn't the calculation wrong?
1 email = 36 different accounts ( max )
15 * 36 = 540
but I have 687 verified links or am I missing something here?
What other captcha services do you suggest? I want to see if I can go above 30+ unique domains.
Thank you for your suggestion. But I am talking about registering the expired tumblr account with GSA SER, not manually.
Is it ok to have different link URL? It is form the same project I posted above.
This is my campaign I started earlier today. Project is still running ...
I have it set to maxmimum 3 accounts per site, maximum posts per account (6+-2)
Loaded 5 catchalls, 5 mail.ru, 5 inbox.eu into the project.
When you said Skyrock does that, I didn't understand what you are exactly talking about
So I have total of 687 verified urls because I have multiple post on the web 2.0 accounts from 2-5. Am I right? So GSA SER treats each url and adds them to the verified list?
It may be the case why I am getting that 687 urls verified
Also, How do you set up the articles. Because you don't want all of the post in the same account to point to your same site right? I should have think about it before.
You settings "maximum posts per account (6+-2)" how does it work?
For articles you can use the option in scheduled posting settings to "link only on X% of all articles posted" if you want.
The maximum posts per account range that you set works by either adding or subtracting the second number from the first number.
So in the first box I have 6 and in the second box I have 2 so that means it would make anywhere from 4-8 posts per web 2.0.
6-2 = 4
6+2 = 8
so its like setting a range 4-8
Hope that makes sense.
is there a way to automatically delete dead accounts?
Thanks
@luca.vi - Look in the options tab. There is an option called "Re-verify existing backlinks every x minutes" which I think should remove the dead URLs.
Any way we can make that change? Thanks
Have you or anyone else tested if SEREngines works with sandboxed browsers like Firefox with Sandboxie?
As I understand, your program requires the use of a browser session or two.
Also, do I need additional licenses for Sven's program, to use all three of the SEREngines licenses, or do all three licensed copies of SEREngines run concurrently, along with a single GSA-SER install?
@Deeeeeeee : SEREngines uses its own custom browser and doesn't require the use of the one installed on your system.
Each SEREngine license runs on a seperate computer, meaning you will also need a copy of GSA SER on each computer and the appropriate licensing for it. A SEREngines license is generated on the website as a API key.
@Dab : Yes, others are currently being done and will be out today. Also just pushed another update for Tumblr, found the issue with Blog Subdomain Name.
I will 100% definitely be buying your service and use of the engines.
I am right now still trying to deal with what I already have and getting it to work optimally. lol
Very soon, though...
It seems like a very useful addition to GSA-SER.
Is there a link to an FAQ for required services? (e-mail, proxy, etc.)
After importing accounts would be nice to have the option not to create new accounts on a project level.
Also @s4nt0s is it possible to update the dofollow/nofollow attribute of each engine? right now all engines are marked as dofollow and we cannot use the right click and "uncheck all engines with no follow" for example.
Thanks
From James:
@xnseo : I will update the engines with the proper do/nofollow asap.
@Deeeeeeee : I am going to do up a recommended requirements and common errors page today/over the weekend, it will be on our site.
@dab: That is a good question. I have contacted Sven to see how to do this.
I think that James forgot to update the nofollow of Sere Social Profile. They are all nofollow right?
I am using a mix of catchall + emails created with sere.
So Far I am not able to get any jimdo registered, I get this:
Also it is very difficult to get bcz, miarroba and overblog to register. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Contrary to other engines like wordpress or tumblr for example where it just works. I think canalblog too is the same but they keep deleting my web 2.0 so I don't try anymore lol
@Dab : To only post to the accounts you have imported and not to create new, set "Maximum accounts per site" in Scheduled Posting to 0.
@Xnseo : Updated the dofollow/nofollow sites
Regarding those sites, sometimes the sites will go up or down so some will have registration issues from time to time while others are more reliable.
I am seeing messages that tumblr is in the online blacklist and ser is not posting to my created web 2.0. I guess there are some subdomains that appears there and ser is only considering the root domains? Which is not correct.
I created a project only to create web 2.0 accounts so I set it up with a default article and no link (only 1 article per account).
After that I exported the accounts and imported them in another project so that I could post to those accounts. I also set up the project with 1 accounts per site so that it doesnt create new ones and only use the existing ones. Imported all emails to the new project too (I am not sure if this is necessary though). Again all imported accounts were created with sere in another project, I didn't manually create any of them of buy. The imported accounts were all exported with SER too.
- wordpress got a suspension. I think this is due to connecting with different ips to the same accounts. Would be nice that with SERE account data also include proxy used to create the account (available in exporting and importing). When submitting a new article, if the proxy used to create the account is not available we could just ignore this account and not post there (this could be an option and is useful for people that changes proxies every month)
- over-blog is very sensitive to proxies, some works, some don't. Meaning that if a valid proxy was used to create an account and then another (not valid for overblog) is used, it will fail. Binding proxy to account data for creation/submission will also help here.
12:21:25: [-] 023/845 login failed (0, Connection refused) - https://connect.over-blog.com/en/signup- blogdetik will always fail with this (I did check it in my engine selection)
12:10:07: [-] 001/868 no engine matches - http://blog.detik.com/tulisanterbaru- hatenablog fails with
12:12:06: [-] 005/868 login failed (the hatena id or password you entered does not match our records.) - https://www.hatena.ne.jp/login?location=//blog.hatena.ne.jp/go?blog=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.hatena.ne.jp%2Fregister%3Fvia%3D201006- Purevolume also fail with login/password error:
12:12:21: [-] 006/868 login failed (there was a problem with your username / password combination. please try again.) - http://www.purevolume.com/login- bcz: login will sometimes fail with
12:25:55: [-] 031/629 login failed (invalid username or email) - http://bcz.com/- bcz when login is successful submission fails with:
12:13:57: [-] 011/868 submission failed (#blogname couldn't be found) - http://bcz.com/pricing/?bid=******** (I masked the value)- Joomla also fail:
12:14:33: [-] 013/865 SerEngines: failed with invalid email/password. - https://www.joomla.com/my/login- Rediff too
12:14:59: [-] 014/865 login failed (login_error) - http://blogs.rediff.com/wp-login.php- Miarroba fails
12:17:33: [-] 017/865 login failed (#titulo couldn't be found) - http://blogs.miarroba.com/nuevo.php- Fc2 fails
12:17:41: [-] 018/845 login failed (invalid e-mail address or password) - https://fc2.com/en/login.php?ref=blog- notehub, login seems successful but submission failed with
12:25:14: [-] 030/629 submission failed (Cannot find any text for wait_complete) - https://notehub.org/newAs for using the same proxy for registration, login and submit. SER already does this, but not sure for imported accounts like you are trying to do (@Sven??)
If so, I think there is something up with the export and import because most of your issues are LOGIN* based issues which I can ensure you there is nothing wrong with these web2.0s engines (I checked only a few hours ago).
As this is a SER thing, I will have to dig deeper and talk with Sven about this.
Thanks