I don't mind to create an email on my domain for this verification.
Will emails from the same domain work all the time for verification? I'm just afraid that they may raise a flag if too many verifications are done from the same @domain.com.
Also, only new created accounts are affected or all previously created alias accounts will have to be verified too?
I believe it is just new accounts but I'm not sure.
I'm also not sure about the same domain raising a flag. I guess we will have to see what happens. Last time this happened they removed the verification after a few days.
Who knows what they will do this time. unfortunately we are at the mercy of them if we want to continue using their services.
So I have continued to try and get the verification issue resolved with outlook so we can make aliases but it is still posing problems but I haven't given up yet. In the meantime, just turn off aliases by choosing 'no' in the dropdown under 'create aliases'
I coded up another platform (net-c.com) but then realized it only has imap access and not pop3 so it is worthless to SER unless @sven decides to integrate IMAP, which would be awesome!
Yes now is working very bad. I am getting only errors and pretty few verified links. How we can fix this? When we can wait for and update..Or maybe for an yahoo account creator if can work good, thanks.
I just used this software to create outlook accounts, it works fine, just don't select aliases.
@theorbital is working on a fix and he has always help me in the past, just be patient, all the email providers are changing the parameters all the time. So some things might just take a little longer.
Ok, I think I got something that is working rather well.
It is very important that you have your own catchall account set up on your own domain with something like cpanel that you can use to verify these emails.
It must be set up as a default address or catchall address because AC+ just uses 7 random chars before your domain name to create the email address.
Hi @athlon24 - the reason why you need to create a catchall email on your own domain is because AC+ uses a random email address each time to verify as outlook sees it.
In order to not create a huge footprint I use a catchall on my own domain and on my own server so any unrouted email that is sent to my domain is routed to the catchall address I set up. That enables AC+ to use random text and it still gets routed to the catchall email that you set up in the email verification tab.
netcourrier is new things i found and there is no more laposte let me know its account creating but i will try to login not working for me. what to do. its creating email like that tightfistedvacuHP495@
Hi Orbital, want to use your program again, but since bluehost does not allow me to add a standard account (anymore) from the cpanel (i have a shared account with them).Is there a way to still setup catch all? My VPS are all controlled through command, not sure how to set this up without easy cpanel. Thanks!
Comments
Just saying.
So I have continued to try and get the verification issue resolved with outlook so we can make aliases but it is still posing problems but I haven't given up yet. In the meantime, just turn off aliases by choosing 'no' in the dropdown under 'create aliases'
I coded up another platform (net-c.com) but then realized it only has imap access and not pop3 so it is worthless to SER unless @sven decides to integrate IMAP, which would be awesome!
Thanks for your patience
I was able to remove the blacklisted/empty emails and replace them with new ones.
It is very important that you have your own catchall account set up on your own domain with something like cpanel that you can use to verify these emails.
It must be set up as a default address or catchall address because AC+ just uses 7 random chars before your domain name to create the email address.
Here is a doc on how to do it in cpanel: http://docs.cpanel.net/twiki/bin/view/AllDocumentation/CpanelDocs/DefaultAddress
Here is a video showing you the feature.
I will be sending out the update momentarily.
Thanks again for your patience as I worked through this.