Yep, so the original sites and all the ones mentioned above are basically gone and done.
I've since created several new ones and they are creeping up as usual.. some in the top 5, some in the top 20.. another week and i guess they will be on top..
Insane, so you're doing exactly the same kind of spammy websites that have gone? If they rank, that means it's just some kind of refresh that kills them and they don't have it in the algorithm to kill those kind of sites. So when the refresh comes, then those sites will be gone again. Is that what you think will happen insane?
@jonathanjon The method is churn and burn, thats exactly what will happen. Build a site, spam the shit out of it, it'll rank for a limited time, then eventually crash and burn. When it burns, churn out another one. The key is to make sure that the site in question has a decent ROI. No point doing this if you're only making pennies.
@doubleup but if you're making decent ROI surely using less risky strategies would work? You coudl probably get into top 2-3 positions with slower approach. I am glad people experiment and not criticizing, just wonder what benefit churn and burn has? I suppose you don't get so disheartened when Google crushes you!
@spunko2010 As an example, i setup a site last week. Bought the domain in the morning, and built links to it immediately. By that evening it was already in 16th place. 2 days later, it hit 3rd place and is already earning. Via other methods, it would probably have taken weeks, if not a month to rank. That's weeks of cash i would have been missing out on.
@doubleup I am trying out a little bit of churn and burn for fun. Do you blast it with like a 100k links and then leave it or do you keep building till it burns? Any restrictions on the type of links you use?
@Velocity Normally i blast until it ranks. However with this site, i used a dofollow list i'd put together. Ran a blast, then stopped when the list was exhausted. The only links i don't use are referrer, indexer and web 2.0
@Velocity NP. Not competitive at all compared to my usual. 6000 exact match local searches, and high competition and a CPC of just over a dollar according to google keyword tool
Like i am running 65+ (including direct link and multi tier setup) campaigns with 30 dedicated proxies, 100 threads but in my all direct link campaign are getting very low verification links..like 2-3-6-8 etc. means not even cross 10 links per day.
Please let me know if i did something wrong in setting..
Thing is, if you tiered this spam, wouldn't rankings be much more long term?
If you can spam all these links and achieve your goals then why not just pop those generated tier 1's into exactly the same campaign and blast those... Then do it again and again and again, before you know it you will have 5 tiers pointing to the tier that originally got you to the top spot...
Surely a way to limit the exposure of that is to add 2-4 other links in, using GSA's built in feature. Before you know it you have links pointing everywhere.
All my sites are gone. When I search for my terms all I see is ads, Google shopping and universal search. No more organic results. Google became an Ad Search Engine. SEO is dead. Move on.
Comments
InSane, does that mean your absolute spam sites are all gone - I think the last you said was 80% are gone. So what's the consensus now?
thanks
If you can spam all these links and achieve your goals then why not just pop those generated tier 1's into exactly the same campaign and blast those... Then do it again and again and again, before you know it you will have 5 tiers pointing to the tier that originally got you to the top spot...
Surely a way to limit the exposure of that is to add 2-4 other links in, using GSA's built in feature. Before you know it you have links pointing everywhere.