Skip to content

SEREngines 2 Testing is Now Ready

1181921232448

Comments

  • royalmiceroyalmice WEBSITE: ---> https://asiavirtualsolutions.com | SKYPE:---> asiavirtualsolutions
    @shaun   -- i did mention that indexing is disabled

    Having indexing enabled on live projects is a waste of time and resources, since almost 30% of all verified links will fail re verification, therefor submitting them right away to indexing is not an good idea.  Instead at the end of every month i manually do reverification of all my projects and what are still alive, i then export to my indexers. 

    I find this to be more productive and i get better results 
  • @Anth20 thanks for the info! I am on it today. I will report back when I find a provider that accepts Paypal.
  • shaunshaun https://www.youtube.com/ShaunMarrs
    @royalmice yea was just curious if you were doing it manual or not. What indexer are you using this days?
  • edited March 2017
    @shaun alright cool I'll look elsewhere thanks.

    @royalmice yeah nice productivity there about indexing, makes sense.

    @viking your welcome, we will find one :)
  • royalmiceroyalmice WEBSITE: ---> https://asiavirtualsolutions.com | SKYPE:---> asiavirtualsolutions
    edited March 2017
    @shaun

    Ii used to use GSA SEO indexer and GSA Url Redirect pro ( but hardly use them anymore as they are to slow and i am not seeing worthwhile results for the resources they consume.
    I also used just about every online indexing out there but stopped over a year ago as nothing i used gave me much satisfaction, specially not the money i was spending on them.

    These days i find the best indexing come from just adding a 2nd  or more tiers. I am also getting great indexing results from creating Co-Citation Feeds from the links ( 
  • ALEEGSALEEGS Argentina
    LOL only 2860 unique domains?
  • royalmiceroyalmice WEBSITE: ---> https://asiavirtualsolutions.com | SKYPE:---> asiavirtualsolutions
    edited April 2017
    LOL over 3 and half days
  • edited April 2017
    @amoya I think that's the blog because of their meta charset settings
  • Anth20 could be... thanks
    but all web2.0 is like this.... this is weird

  • @Anth20
    i have checked and all the site have this charset setting "text/html; charset=utf-8"
    it should be ok...


    maybe it's something with the serengine ?

  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
     @amoya - Do you have character spinning option enabled in content gen?
  • shaunshaun https://www.youtube.com/ShaunMarrs
    edited April 2017
    @Anth20

    Ran two identical projects for a little while with a max of posting 10 times per domain. The only difference is one was using catch alls, one was using mail.ru. Left it to use about 200 2captcha credits each.

    Catch Alls

    image

    Mail.Ru

    image
  • I am still having trouble posting to the SEREngines sites. I want to let everyone know @s4nt0s has been a great help identifying issues.
    I have quite a few "Return: 502 Bad Gateway, Proxy: 173.44.222.35:80" and got new proxies from Buyproxies yesterday, but I'm still receiving this error. I have my threads anywhere from 1-4 and watch the process manually to try to help.
    Below are the codes I receive and would like to fix them 1 at a time.

    1)I haven't had 1 successful submission at bcz.com. This is what the log states.
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [+] 07/34 matches engine Bcz - http://bcz.com/register/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://bcz.com/register/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://bcz.com/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://bcz.com/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://bcz.com/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://bcz.com/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://bcz.com/register/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://bcz.com/register/
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [!] 07/34 No E-Mail found matches mask !*@*.*.*
    [10:47:48] SER Engines test: [-] 07/34 SerEngines: failed with Unable to fill variable with content - http://bcz.com/register/


    2) It states unknown extra submission status.
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [+] 08/34 matches engine elecdir.com - http://www.elecdir.com/
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [+] 08/34 new URL - http://www.elecdir.com/submit_site
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [-] 08/34 unknown submission status - http://www.elecdir.com/submit_site
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [+] 08/34 new URL - http://www.elecdir.com/submit_press_release
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [-] 08/34 unknown extra submission status - http://www.elecdir.com/submit_press_release


    3) I get a lot of "no form at all". It says no form to fill.
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [+] 09/34 matches engine Streetfire - http://www.streetfire.net/
    [10:47:52] SER Engines test: [-] 09/34 no form at all - http://www.streetfire.net/register.aspx

    [10:50:21] SER Engines test: [-] 14/34 no form at all - http://www.collegelobby.com/register

    [10:52:37] SER Engines test: [+] 23/34 new URL - http://hi.im/users/sign_up
    [10:52:37] SER Engines test: [-] 23/34 no form at all - http://hi.im/users/sign_up


    4)I believe this is a proxy related issue.
    [10:47:54] SER Engines test: [-] 11/34 download failed (Return: 502 Bad Gateway, Proxy: 173.44.222.35:80) - https://www.alltrails.com/


    5) Some engines state - "[name=\"about_me\"] couldn't be found" These are 3 from this morning. I think someone else had this issue and I couldn't find a fix for it.

    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [+] 30/34 matches engine Ampedpages - http://ampedpages.com/
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://ampedpages.com/
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://ampedpages.com/signup
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://ampedpages.com/signup
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://ampedpages.com/signup
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: CLICK_BUTTON - http://ampedpages.com/login
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://ampedpages.com/login
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 SerEngines: failed with [name=\"about_me\"] couldn't be found - http://ampedpages.com/my-profile
    [10:54:36] SER Engines test: [-] 30/34 registration failed ([name=\"about_me\"] couldn't be found) - http://ampedpages.com/my-profile

    [11:07:24] SER Engines test: [-] 12/30 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://onesmablog.com/login
    [11:07:24] SER Engines test: [-] 12/30 SerEngines: failed with [name=\"about_me\"] couldn't be found - http://onesmablog.com/my-profile



    6) I haven't seen this one before. I switched from catchall to a mail.ru account this morning. Maybe that is why.
    [10:50:45] SER Engines test: [!] 19/34 No E-Mail found matches mask !*@*.*.*
    [10:50:45] SER Engines test: [-] 19/34 SerEngines: failed with Unable to fill variable with content - http://xtg
    em.com/register

    7) I dont think I have see a 500 error transferring to the signup page before.
    [17:09:05] SER Engines test: [+] 05/31 matches engine Unblog.fr - http://unblog.fr/wp-signup.php
    [17:09:05] SER Engines test: [-] 05/31 SerEngines: OPEN_PAGE - http://unblog.fr/wp-signup.php
    [17:09:05] SER Engines test: [-] 05/31 SerEngines: failed with 500, Error transferring http://unblog.fr/wp-signup.php - server replied: Internal Server Error - http://unblog.fr/wp-signup.php
    [17:09:05] SER Engines test: [-] 05/31 registration failed (500, Error transferring http://unblog.fr/wp-signup.php - server replied: Internal Server Error) - http://unblog.fr/wp-signup.php

    If anyone could help it would be greatly appreciated. I know @s4nt0s is busy and I don't want to flood his inbox with messages. Also if other users are experiencing the same issues hopefully this will help them in the future.

    Thanks in advance!
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @shaun - You try any projects with a mix of mail.ru and catchalls? 

    @p1nger - A few of those that have the message "No E-Mail found matches mask !*@*.*.*" That's basically saying it doesn't support the type of email being used. I'll check on some of the other messages with james again.
  • shaunshaun https://www.youtube.com/ShaunMarrs
    @s4nt0s nah, it was mainly to see the difference between the two email types. Ordered some fresh emails for testing as they may have been a little burned.
  • @s4nt0s just reporting in. Someone PM'd a lead for some mail.ru's which I bought. Unfortunately, even with mail.ru emails there is significant fail rate with the engines. one engine even returned an error message that was masking for "mail.ru" so they are one step ahead of us. To me after running a test project again today with fresh proxies, it is 50/50 in terms of leaving a catchall for mail.ru. I don't see an advantage for doing it. Whether you get 10% success rate with catchall, or 10% success rate with mail.ru, on separate engines, it is a failure from a risk diversity issue. It is literally spoon-feeding G with a reason to hit you with a penalty. Without 30 - 40 engines, all you are doing is aggregating posts on a few engines and exposing your MS. Don't want anyone to meet Fred ;-)  I have and it is not pleasant.

    @shaun thanks for the post. You are the man! How on earth did you get edu success using catchalls??? Can you share your settings? Who is your catchall provider? I am using catchallboxes and have never had one single edu success. I am guessing it is actually a proxy issue, but noticed that the mail.ru test did not yield and edu's, so was just wondering...

    @Anth20 I will pm you the mailru source shortly. 
  • shaunshaun https://www.youtube.com/ShaunMarrs
    @viking I use SEOSpartians, I used a few others before them but they sucked ass and have never gone anywhere else since moving over to them.

    Mate I have no idea tbh, I just set the projects up and let them run. I have deleted the projects now but I am going to repeate the test, probably tomorrow when 2captcha add my credit so if I get edublogs I will give you a shout.
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @viking - Are you able to post the mail.ru source publicly? If not, shoot me a PM, I'd like to check them out.

    @P1nger - Regarding the 502 errors, James said that's either a proxy or site issue  but if you're getting it for a lot of sites then its a proxy issue. 
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    James added a new engine today. (Notehub) 

    Just letting everyone know.
  • 710fla710fla ★ #1 GSA SER VERIFIED LIST serpgrow.com
    @s4nt0s thanks for the update. glad the headless crash is fixed I'm about to sign up again.

    Quick question though, how many engines are working as of now?
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @710fla - My latest project from this morning has verifieds from 13 unique domains with another 1 pending submitted so looking like 14 out of 17 engines were successful on this run. 
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    edited April 2017
    James just pushed Mail.ru email creator engine out. 

    Here's some important info you need to know about running that engine:

    In the DATA tab of the project there will be a new "Save File" setting. First create a text file where you want the email accounts to be saved, then select that file in the project settings.

    In you options under the "Scheduled Posting" section:

    1. Check "Allow posting to same site again
    2. Maximum accounts per site to how many email accounts you want to create. (Be cautious, it is best to have lots of proxies)
    3. Maximum posts per account = 1
    4. The other settings in the scheduled posting section can just be set to 1, or however you want to space out account creation.
  • mail.ru accounts have been compromised.  What now.  Any other emails work?

  • I must be doing something wrong.  Only getting 3 verified


  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @lostbwana - What do you mean mail.ru accounts have been compromised?

    Need to know more about your settings to see where you're going wrong. 
  • http://www.zdnet.com/article/over-25-million-accounts-stolen-after-mail-ru-forums-raided-by-hackers/ Very weird experience trying to buy them. What would be the best way to show you my settings? Thanks
  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @lostbwana - Didn't know they were compromised, but I wouldn't think that would hurt new accounts or really anyone using SERengines since the emails are used just to sign up to the sites. 

    A few questions

    1) What are you using for captcha solving?
    2) What kind of proxies are you using?
    3) Were you using mail.ru? They should still work fine so it must be settings. 

    Maybe a screenshot of your proxy settings in SER. Click options in SER and go to the first tab called submission, then screenshot that. Also maybe a screenshot of your scheduled posting options. 
  • s4nt0s Hello Friend

    i have a problem in non english langauge ( using utf-8) 
    in the old SER BETA , it was fine

    here is an example of the old SER work:

    and this is the new SER ( all non english article looks like this )

    * this is the same article, it was only update the SER ENGINE and this is the result

    please advice


  • s4nt0ss4nt0s Houston, Texas
    @amoya - Please send me some example articles so we can test this on our side. 
This discussion has been closed.