that way i have a bigger amount to judge wether the ping service is good or bad (some have 2 successful/2 fail and you risk to copy that "ping" part where it was randomly successfull. its better when u know that it was successfull more than 1 time
Best Regards
ron SERLists.com
I like that filter. Duly noted.
When I did it (several times), I probably had a minimum of 100 failed or successes for each pinger, so I had really good data.
The google RPC's all great, but I wouldn't want to send the same results to multiple google pingers - that looks spammy. That's why it is best to only use a handful of very good ones - and all different ones.
oil
@Ozz, so in other words the pings are only for the blog comments and not for the other links?
... in that case i would prolly prefer to skip the whole pings for better performance
seagul
No @oil pings are for any URL. Ozz meant the sequence that SER does it is verify BC then ping
seagul
I copied a ping list from a well known pingler, I mean pinger site and used the best 5 from there. Works a treat.
AlexR Cape Town
I'm pretty sure that Sven said that pings are only used for blog & image comments...it's the other type of links that get sent to indexer.
Ozz
i'm sure about this, too.
Sven www.GSA-Online.de
Yes, they are not used anywhere else but for Comments/Trackbacks.
Comments
I like that filter. Duly noted.
When I did it (several times), I probably had a minimum of 100 failed or successes for each pinger, so I had really good data.
The google RPC's all great, but I wouldn't want to send the same results to multiple google pingers - that looks spammy. That's why it is best to only use a handful of very good ones - and all different ones.
@Ozz, so in other words the pings are only for the blog comments and not for the other links?
... in that case i would prolly prefer to skip the whole pings for better performance