that way i have a bigger amount to judge wether the ping service is good or bad (some have 2 successful/2 fail and you risk to copy that "ping" part where it was randomly successfull. its better when u know that it was successfull more than 1 time
When I did it (several times), I probably had a minimum of 100 failed or successes for each pinger, so I had really good data.
The google RPC's all great, but I wouldn't want to send the same results to multiple google pingers - that looks spammy. That's why it is best to only use a handful of very good ones - and all different ones.
Comments
I like that filter. Duly noted.
When I did it (several times), I probably had a minimum of 100 failed or successes for each pinger, so I had really good data.
The google RPC's all great, but I wouldn't want to send the same results to multiple google pingers - that looks spammy. That's why it is best to only use a handful of very good ones - and all different ones.
@Ozz, so in other words the pings are only for the blog comments and not for the other links?
... in that case i would prolly prefer to skip the whole pings for better performance