New OnPage SEO Function - Need Feedback
Sven
www.GSA-Online.de
The latest updates of GSA Keyword Research have been all for a new module that offer a functionality that other tools would give you for 200USD per month. Though I am in need of some feedback here. Right now @s4nt0s (as always, thanks a lot!) was the only one giving his thoughts to this and Im happy he did. Without him, I wouldn't have thought coding this.
Below is the screenshot of this new module:
You can reach it by:
1. double click on a keyword to open the "Keyword Competition" Screen
2. Click again on Compare //Later updates will probably include both tables in one//
Now what you have here is a table with you site, the top results from the search engine and the Average (change compare algorithm at top) of top3/5/10.
The icons and colors indicate how you should change the row value on your page compared to the top3/5/10 to reach a better ranking.
Please let me know what other values are important for you (disable the option "Hide unused Items" at the top to see all available data). Im currently in search for all possible meta/link tag values there are (even if not important for SEO).
Thanked by 1Michaelvg
Tagged:
Comments
http://www.seo-hero.tech
I advise you to think carefully about it is invaluable.
More Ngram information (patent from Google...) : Using Ngram Phrase Models to Generate Site Quality Scores
It is neither more nor less than the recipe for the success of a site compared to its competitors. I imagine that he could work with SER to add ngrams in our articles (in accordance with its title) in order to make it excellent, to allow the creation of semantic thiers of madness (T1 < T2 < T3) ....
Outbound links social network.
If the site/page use analytic tracker.
Longtrail ... but think ngram is better
https://moz.com/learn/seo/on-page-factors
This forum page : https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fforum.gsa-online.de%2Fdiscussion%2F27390%2Fnew-onpage-seo-function-need-feedback%2Fp1
TheBestIndexer (^^) : https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fthebestindexer.com%2F
It is to get a general idea, and that too is a option that adds value.
For exemple:
http://www.siteliner.com (full website)
https://www.duplichecker.com/ (copy/paste article)
https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/ (copy/paste article)
https://copywritely.com/plagiarism-checker/ (copy/paste article)
What do you think of bringing the word count closer to the density for more readability ?
In speed the response latency (server side)...
I don't know if the classe ip may interest you ?
I just sent you a message about the ngrams ^^
Although where the real gains are made is with TF/IDF resp. NLP keyword suggestions. While some parameters like avg # of words is helpful, most parameters don't matter. If you have some h2 more and some h3 less than the competitor doesn't mean shit.
Here's a recent post about SurferSEO and how it works and suggests keywords based on TF/IDF and Google NLP and here's some code on how to run URLs/content against Google's NLP API. For meaningful results the boilerplate content should be removed prior analysis, e.g. with https://github.com/buriy/python-readability
I'd consider buying GSA Keyword Research if this was going to be implemented. Any plans for this?
For example, if for a keyword compared, we find in the best sites, a group of identical words containing it, it is absolutely necessary to include that in our site. This group of words is strongly linked to the context of the keyword.
....
The recipe for success
PS : Personally I already bought it because if this function happens, Sven should increase the price of the software because it will take a lot of value.
What are the limitations of the free trial?