Also while finalizing (I hope you see it as well this way) the project, what would you be willing to pay for this? And are you willing to pay for it? Also the name is still not final...let me know.
@meph yes but what you want to enter as file name here as the program has to generate them anyway to some level due to the fact that the files are not just one?
0.26 - new: improved article editor a bit - new: project option: Title must have keyword - new: project keywords and anchors for internal spinner are ignored - new: insert spin syntax for selected articles - new: status bar in internal browser - new: refresh button in internal browser
For example, Is there a way to change settings ("mix sentence from all articles" to "mix paragraphs from all articles") for the already scraped articles to avoid having to re-scrape?
Same question for changing for example the Best Spinner from "good" to "best"
whats more interesting to me is: how is the quality...beside markov (which will get improved later), how does every algorithm compare to other software you might have used?
Compared to Article Forge, the quality is much better, but uniqueness is lower.
I am scraping from Google, no markov, using Spin Rewriter set at the highest level (most readable) and the uniqueness is ranging from 17 to 90.
It also depends on the keyword niche. Articles for example, on varicose veins and affordable care act, are extremely readable.
I like the export feature to GSA SER, versus having to pay extra to use the Article Forge API to generate the articles. Article Forge allows for 200,000 words per month using the API, then you have to pay extra. So, I want to make use of their API for blog posting, not GSA SER.
Another note on Article Forge, the original article is totally unique and readable in most cases, however, after spinning the readability drops significantly.
One note on Content Generator when using Spin Rewriter. You can only submit new content once every 7 seconds. So, occasionally I receive errors as it moves on to the next article and the article is not spun.
Will do test but quick question: how it checks for relevant content? When I put long phrase like 5+ words in log I can see lots of "unrelevant content (keywords missing)" - if it doesn't find long keyword in article it will be not added/scraped?
@meph depends on how you added your keyword. If you added a phrase in quotes, it will search for that exact appearance, else it will search for each word and see if it's in the collected data. If so, it is taken, if not, it is vanished.
Also it searched here for the exact word, e.g. a search for SEO will not match for SEOTOOL.
I would like to see a one time fee, like Kontent machine. the one thing I like most about Kontent machine that it saves content to the cloud for quick importing.
Is it possible to define keywords which should be in the titles?
When I try to search articles using a lot of long tail keywords - I have to turn this option off due to the fact that I have too long keywords (and I am getting no to relevant articles)... So better option would be to enter some other keywords to look for the title when scraping. I hope this makes sense.
P.S. How software is looking in titles when I enter more than 1 keyword? is it looking for one of the keywords from the list?
Comments
Thanks.
I guess you want a Refresh button on the new "internal browser" ? = yes
See this diamond shape character in generated article --> We a great day�s buying at Clever Clicker, and never using a single
2. on my list
- new: project option: Title must have keyword
- new: project keywords and anchors for internal spinner are ignored
- new: insert spin syntax for selected articles
- new: status bar in internal browser
- new: refresh button in internal browser
suspect it might resurface with additional testing with the same kw
Same question for changing for example the Best Spinner from "good" to "best"
whats more interesting to me is: how is the quality...beside markov (which will get improved later), how does every algorithm compare to other software you might have used?
can it compet against the two other big players?
Compared to Article Forge, the quality is much better, but uniqueness is lower.
I am scraping from Google, no markov, using Spin Rewriter set at the highest level (most readable) and the uniqueness is ranging from 17 to 90.
It also depends on the keyword niche. Articles for example, on varicose veins and affordable care act, are extremely readable.
I like the export feature to GSA SER, versus having to pay extra to use the Article Forge API to generate the articles. Article Forge allows for 200,000 words per month using the API, then you have to pay extra. So, I want to make use of their API for blog posting, not GSA SER.
Plus Content Generator is way faster!
PS: I am willing to pay for it.
The determining factor for me is how many articles get indexed and stay indexed.
@fng great, let me know about results.
Also it searched here for the exact word, e.g. a search for SEO will not match for SEOTOOL.
I would like to try the tool if there is trial/demo, or pm me a few examples of the articles generated by the tool.