I have a few tests going right now some with just non-contextual links and some with only contextual links and some with both. Stuff is still all over the place right now tbh. Just checked my rank tracker and two pages have had a jump that are T1 Web 2 <- T2 SER Contextuals <- T3 SER Non Contextuals.
Still planning my own web 2.0 tool though, just need to lock down some methods for better cash flow and to know the tool will be useful to people though.
@shaun - I'm doing a few test runs with RankerX to filter out the good links. Are you using disposable emails? And do you think the error messages that aren't related to emails mean that the engine is currently broken?
@shaun - thanks! That's what I was thinking with the emails. The error messages are things like "image captcha" and "creating..." A handful of others say variations of "no longer accepting registrations", which I assume is true.
Never noticed them tbh mate, I spend very little time on RX I just smashout the social networks and some web 2.0 profiles. I have found you defo get more verifieds with your own emails though.
On some of my stuff I use it as a do follow non contextual indexing tier, on others I use it as a do follow contextual tier and send it to an indexing service.
Hi @shaun, as a novice I learnt a lot from your blog, I really appreciate your work. From your latest "Black Hat SEO Report", I noticed left to your every tier, there is a "+", even the tier 1 （You don't divide the tier 1 into contextual and non-contextual, do you?) .
Currently, my tiers are very simple, my tier 1s are only contextual, I only divide tier 2 into contextual and non-contextual, so, I'm very curious about how you build your tiers, if you can, can you elaborate it please?
Hey @shaun, Figured I'd put this one on your radar after seeing @edge13's post. Have you seen SER Powerhouse? I bought it as an upsell to Kotent Machine (before I switched to using GSA Content Generator), and it makes setting up tiered projects dead simple. Might be something to include in your own arsenal, but perhaps tutorials might help new people out too. This is the sales page for it: http://kontentmachine.com/serph/ I've found it useful in the past. Admittedly, I'm not nearly as good at GSA SER as I'd like to be, and this has helped me a lot in churning projects out faster when I'm running SER.
@edge13 They are project groups mate, not the actual campaigns some of them just have a campaign holding RX Links in them, some have RX and SER contextuals and some have manual web 2.0s.
I had to close the groups because of the naming conventions I use for my campaigns have the keywords in them. I haven't used non contextuals from SER on T1 for years.
@VMart I haven't used those engines for years/ever.
@kxp I have seen it in the past but never really saw the point as most of my projects come from templates or backups so all I need to do is flip the content and customize the keywords.
I see, thanks for your reply @shaun! You do help a lot.
What do you mean "have a campaign holding RX Links in them"?
I have never used RX yet, I've seen you and others talking good things about it, I'm planning to subscribe it, but I've subscribed Serengines. my question is what the differences among RX's web 2.0 and SER's web 2.0 and Serengines' web 2.0 are?
@edge13 Basically what I explain here I use SER to hold RX links and keep them upto date and build tiers to them as I find it easier than anything else I have worked out.
I used SERE a while back but wasn't really a fan of it tbh. RX is my main Web 2 creator right now but its only because it is the best of a bad bunch, it still misses basic stuff and its been weeks since they mentioned their RX v2 to me.
@shaun In Platform Identifier using PR filter I'm extracting links, Do the links which goes to uncategory folder will be filtered or not. I'm allowing uncategory list to submitting SER, for me the PR is not getting filter.
@Vmart - We're still looking into the PR0 problem you were having. If the URL's aren't sorted into a specific engine type, SER most likely won't be able to submit to them so submitting them to SER might be a waste of time/resources.
Comments
Still planning my own web 2.0 tool though, just need to lock down some methods for better cash flow and to know the tool will be useful to people though.
For tier 3 should I must to do do-follow filter?
T3 is used for indexing t2 right? for this should I filter do-follow?
Currently, my tiers are very simple, my tier 1s are only contextual, I only divide tier 2 into contextual and non-contextual, so, I'm very curious about how you build your tiers, if you can, can you elaborate it please?
I had to close the groups because of the naming conventions I use for my campaigns have the keywords in them. I haven't used non contextuals from SER on T1 for years.
@VMart I haven't used those engines for years/ever.
@kxp I have seen it in the past but never really saw the point as most of my projects come from templates or backups so all I need to do is flip the content and customize the keywords.
What do you mean "have a campaign holding RX Links in them"?
I have never used RX yet, I've seen you and others talking good things about it, I'm planning to subscribe it, but I've subscribed Serengines. my question is what the differences among RX's web 2.0 and SER's web 2.0 and Serengines' web 2.0 are?
Cheers!
I used SERE a while back but wasn't really a fan of it tbh. RX is my main Web 2 creator right now but its only because it is the best of a bad bunch, it still misses basic stuff and its been weeks since they mentioned their RX v2 to me.
In Platform Identifier using PR filter I'm extracting links, Do the links which goes to uncategory folder will be filtered or not.
I'm allowing uncategory list to submitting SER, for me the PR is not getting filter.