Make GSA 64-bit compatible to remove the 2GB memory limit
Hi,
my feature request is to make GSA SER 64-bit compatible, because the 2GB memory limit is too low.
Sure if someone has only 1-2 websites to promote then a 32-bit application is fine.
But if someone has multiple websites to promote and wants to use tiered backlinks, then he needs a lot of links.
my feature request is to make GSA SER 64-bit compatible, because the 2GB memory limit is too low.
Sure if someone has only 1-2 websites to promote then a 32-bit application is fine.
But if someone has multiple websites to promote and wants to use tiered backlinks, then he needs a lot of links.
Comments
try it and stop bitching around!
this is leading to nothing...you can't force me to make a 64bit version...I will improve the 32bit as i think its enough for anyone.
So I think this feature request is completely valid. But you can delete this thread if you don't like suggestions from users.
They're right... How can you run a computer so big for 2 sites and not have any resources? unless you're blasting out 10 million links per day.
Sven has added some nice features today that can double your output..
https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/1041/improving-the-efficiency-of-gsa-ser-feature-request#Item_14
I know I can know run 25 max website with 2 additonal tiers with GSA on a 3 CPU Xeon 3 GB Ram, with tier split into divisions of the same niche (x4)... awesome!
My home PC is a hand built Quad Core x 4 Anthlon II 16GB RAM 1000GB Hard Disk but I have the shittiest internet connection is the world LOL, no fibre optic but one of the best PC money can buy....
You need to decide which campaigns are more profitable and run them together the get the real power out of GSA SER, I think this is when you'll make some good progress with this software...
Actually it is not an issue to recompile it in 64bit. Though I for myself don't think it is required. The problem nowadays is the following:
People don't care to optimize there code or think how to make things better. Instead they rely on the hardware or that customers get a new OS, RAM, CPU or whatsoever. I am a 80th child and grow up with my lovely AMIGA. We had a 7MHz CPU and 512KB Ram. That was enough to run things and I still think it could have been enough if people would just stop relying on hardware upgrades and build there software in a proper way.
I know our software is not perfect and probably never will. But at least I try to make it as fast as I can and use as much resources possible. Sure it would be easier to just compile a 64bit version and don't care anymore. Just that I don't want to. Hope you understand my point of view.
Look at the link I posted and the option of adding two seperate urls per tiered article in the link I showed you. So one tier would almost produce double results.
Take 5 sites in the same niche, and build one tier 2 for all of them with 2 tokens per article. As for posting limits: times that by 5, instead of 10 as you have 2 links per article... Don't forget to calculate the total amount of verfied links for the first tier in order to get the required output for tier 2.
Then create a tier 3 but select the multi tier project you just created again you don't need to multiply the verified links per day as much as you have two links per article, I would say this 3rd tier only needs to be 2 times and big as the 2nd tier (verified links per day).
To keep it more controlled I would say group no more than 5 niche related sites together, if you group 10+ then you have less control over how many links each site will recieve.. There is equal probability but random posting like this is also chaotic the more sites you add to a multi tiered project and just to note it doesn't it just halves the amount submissions to needed to acheive the same results.
@Sven I'm still unsure whether SER will verify these links correctly i.e: 2 per article?? If it doesn't then you'll need to work on submissions per day rather than verifications. This is something I will test and post back here...
Optimised software is awesome, and I completely get it - I'm a developer myself! Bottom line is that if the platform itself has certain limits, then that's your software's limit no matter how optimised the code is, and there is a point where GSA simply can't keep up anymore when the number of projects gets quite big.
Again, either way it goes, GSA is a fantastic tool. Like all the updates so far, a 64-bit version imo would be an invaluable addition.
I vote for a 64bit
My ISP though is a major obstacle... no fiber optic!
"most" companies don't care about anything and don't think.
I made my point clear about this. And you never could have used multiple instances ever. This has a reason if you think a bit about it (hint, blocking SEs).
I also see no point in the emulation. There is no emulation. The 32bit registers on a 64bit CPU are still the same. Nothing is emulated. If you don't have a clue on certain things, you better not talk about it.