Another "is that normal" question - about site list
My sitelist #:
identified: 209424
successful: 32609
verified: 4886
failed: 88163
So, is that normal? How is yours?
Don't be furious, here is some settings I think could be related to the results
All URL scraped by SER
Dedicated proxies used everywhere, daily checked
Use CB & DBC against all captchas, no PR filter
Different engines used, depending on t1, t2, t3, altogether, only video & document sharing NOT used.
100K keywords
Use only do-follow URLs for multi-tier > unchecked
Only verify URLs with a PR of x > unchecked
When to verify > auto
try to always place an URL with anchor text in description/comments > checked
Continuously try to post to a site even failed b4 > checked
Always use keywords to find target sites > unchecked
Use URLs from sitelist > yes to all 4
Analyse & post to competitors backlinks > unchecked
Filter URLs: only "avoid posting urls on same domain twice" & "put url to places where it is clearly seen as spam" CHECKED.
Try to do a verifeid/identified analyse like @LeeG, but that's gonna leave me nowhere to post with this sitelist I got.
Is that submitted/identified need to be improved? Or verified/submitted? Or only thing need to be done is wait for a larger sample?
Please help. Any other info needed?
Comments
@Ozz, thanks for fast reply. I use CB as 1st solver, deathbycaptcha as 2nd.
Will try only pull urls from submitted list. Anything else I can do? 210k identified is not such a small size imho, if more submission/verify could be made out of it (of course I will keep enlarging iddentified list), I will be glad.
Damn, write this reply on my 3.7 inch mobile is definitly nightmare.
A lot of poor results can also be caused by the content you use
Pull anything that is standard in ser
Sven has blog comments to help people to start off
How many of those comments are used time and time again by a lot of ser users
Again, the standard of the articles you use.
Look at it from the other side, if you was running as site and had the article posted. Would you read it and think WTF, what is this bollocks being posted and then delete it and add the email to a spam database
Some engines are high submissions and submission vrs verified will look poor. But the poor will be high numbers. Blog comments is one for that
Directory submissions, another iffy one. These can take months to get verified if your lucky.
Build those on lower tiers and chances are, by the time its been approved by the owner, the link its aimed at will have been deleted
Only use submitted and verified global sites lists. I know Ozz only uses submitted
I use AutoContentWriter for articles
But I have no idea how it compares to other article generators on the market
I know it gets me a lot of wiki links
But at least one is not listed in cb
I looked at the question and thought "your avin a laugh"
He must be looking with his eyes wide shut
look at the mediafire links:
https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/1630/links-per-minute/p5