What is the best indexer for Web2.0 you guys can recommend?
Recently I started using RankerX to create tier1 links and I am using GSA SER to boost those links.
Can you please guide me what is best Indexer to index web2.0 links create by Rankerx
Thanks
Comments
Have you ever tried scrapebox rapid indexer addon?
www.scrapebox.com/rapid-indexer-addon
Can we add GSA Ser Indexer.
Why not pay for a service that actually works and indexes links, an indexing service will naturally include "crawling" also.
https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/20460/best-backlink-indexing-service#latest
I am currently testing out Authority Indexer - Lightspeed upgrade.
The first url I tested with was a wordpress.com link I created over a month ago. For whatever reason, this link has refused to index. I submitted to express indexer, but it didn't do the trick. I've built another tier of contextuals to it and it still didn't index (even though my tiers got indexed fine). So I ran this url through the lightspeed indexer and it was instantly indexed!
Don't get me wrong, express indexer does work great, and I recently tested it on another 200 wordpress.com links and they have almost all been indexed (coming up to the 30 days since submission).
For bulk indexing though, lightspeed indexer gets a big fail from me. I have the desktop app running on my server right now, processing just 200 urls. Some of them are returning errors "Page cannot be submitted". The biggest issue is how long the thing takes to complete. With 10 threads, it's taken over an hour to process just half of those links. I can't see myself using this to bulk index all of my ser links, maybe better suited for stubborn urls that don't index or smaller projects such as high DA links or web 2.0 links.
Plus its locked to my server ip address. If I want to run another instance of it on another server to speed things up, I need to pay another $40 monthly. So for now, I'm gonna keep testing it on stubborn urls that don't seem to index.
BUT, it does instantly index the links that it manages to complete processing, so it does do what it claims to do.
It only supports 2captcha and those 200 urls cost me $1.20! Plus 60 urls did not complete processing.
@shaun The method seems quite sound for indexing but the speed and costs don't make it a worthwhile tool for indexing everything. Someone needs to take this method to another level with a web based service.