How to Rank Top with RankerX + Scrapebox + GSA ?

jamessaylor · July 2016

I don't use PBN for my website .

I use RankerX to make Tier 1 , GSA and Scrapebox for Tier 2 .

I use Kontent machine to spin and create content for article .

Can I rank my website with keywords that have KC from 28 - 32 in LongTail Pro ?

Don't use PBN still rank website ?

Thanks in advance to all who help.

Tim89 · July 2016

Yes, ofcourse you can rank with out using PBNs.

kijix84 · July 2016

Why don't you actually test it out and see for yourself.. How could we possibly know without even knowing the keywords and just some arbitrary "competition rating" metric that surely wasn't developed by Google itself

codyjason · July 2016

Based on my own experience, The best ways to get quality backlinks and success rate from RankerX:

1. You need to prepare:
- Proxy : You should use Private/Dedicated proxies. (30-40 proxies)
- Captcha: 2captcha service.
- Indexer: Instantlinkindexer or ExpressIndexer.
2. How to build campaigns effectly.
- This is an example which I just built campaign via Wizards. You can watch this video:

Results after the first run:
Accounts for Tier1: SUCCESS SITES/ FAILED SITES:88/ 21 => success rate = 87,5%
Accounts for Tier2: SUCCESS SITES/ FAILED SITES= 1224/ 160 => success rate = 95,6%
- Article Directory premium: 6 links
- Bookmarking premium: 13 links
- Social Network premium: 46 links
- PDF : 17 links
- Web 2.0 Profile Tier2: 924 links
- Forum Tier2: 224 links
- Bookmarking Tier2: 202 links

[IMG]

codyjason · July 2016

Based on my own experience, The best ways to get quality backlinks and success rate from RankerX:

1. You need to prepare:
- Proxy : You should use Private/Dedicated proxies. (30-40 proxies)
- Captcha: 2captcha service.
- Indexer: Instantlinkindexer or ExpressIndexer.
2. How to build campaigns effectly.
- This is an example which I just built campaign via Wizards. You can watch this video:

Results after the first run:
Accounts for Tier1: SUCCESS SITES/ FAILED SITES:88/ 21 => success rate = 87,5%
Accounts for Tier2: SUCCESS SITES/ FAILED SITES= 1224/ 160 => success rate = 95,6%
- Article Directory premium: 6 links
- Bookmarking premium: 13 links
- Social Network premium: 46 links
- PDF : 17 links
- Web 2.0 Profile Tier2: 924 links
- Forum Tier2: 224 links
- Bookmarking Tier2: 202 links

[IMG]

Video:

Some results Tier1:

http://williamsontrue1.de.tl/williamsontrue1-h-s-blog.htm
http://www.sixfigureforex.com/forex-reviews/travel-london-eye-temple-bar
http://carrollhermansen9.tumblr.com/post/147941289912/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar
https://storify.com/CarverCarver0/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar
https://clappcarver7.wordpress.com/2016/07/25/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar/
http://CarverWilliamson8.soup.io/post/687632035/Travel-from-the-London-Eye-to-Temple
http://wallinside.com/post-56216853-travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar.html
http://webseriesnetwork.com/profiles/blogs/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar
http://geminiwomen47.ampedpages.com/Travel-from-the-London-Eye-to-Temple-Bar-1465576<

Johan · July 2016

Still shilling for RankerX I see.

I'm sure Rick will be delighted you shared those links with us all.

kijix84 · July 2016

none of those T1s are indexed

not suprised given they are all totally duplicate content

viking · July 2016

Yes, it can be done, but knowing that a PBN works, why would you take a short cut? It doesn't make sense to me.

codyjason · July 2016

kijix84 , jamessaylor :This is just a quick demo that I created to answer(I don't spin content for Tier1, spin content for Tier2 only. You can watch this video:

. I just created it yesterday but Some backlinks indexed by google.
http://carrollhermansen9.tumblr.com/post/147941289912/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar
https://clappcarver7.wordpress.com/2016/07/25/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar/

http://www.mysafemedia.com/clappcooney1/b/2016/7/25/Travel-from-the-London-Eye-to-Temple-Bar

https://storify.com/CarverCarver0/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar

http://clappclapp4.mywapblog.com/travel-from-the-london-eye-to-temple-bar.xhtml
.......

markp · July 2016

I came on here to ask a question about GSA and then saw this. I'm shocked that you are doing this and I am not sure if this is serious or a joke. .

If you do not spin tier1 content it is not going to get indexed. What is worse is that you have taken content from the money site and posted it to the tier 1 properties. I may not know anything about GSA but I know a bit about SEO and if anyone working for me did that I would cut their knackers off. This content is not getting indexed & if is not going to get indexed there is no point in doing tier2 or tier3 links, because the links are going to be going nowhere. what are you thinking? It does not matter what you posted above or in in your video about the success rate for posting is if the indexing rate is zero. None of this makes sense and will not work.

micb11 · July 2016

@codyjason very interesting.

I am not sure why people are having a pop at you. If this is your technique and it works then use it. As you have proved your links are getting indexed!!!!

Would be interesting for you to use the same diagram in your wizard with spun content for Tier 1 to see if indexing rate is better/worse or the same.

Keep us updated on indexing rate for that project.

S0ny · July 2016

@codyjason

totally agreed with you.

this is what exactly i use. Only different i don't use ranker x i outsource for few bucks then i build unique i really don't care about readability . just build contextuals to those webs 2.0 and it passes the juice.

Johan · July 2016

@micb11 "I am not sure why people are having a pop at you"

So, I'll explain why. This isn't his site it belongs to someone else. So it's one of two things:

a. He's been hired to do SEO for them in which he needs putting against a wall and shot for the reasons that @markp explained or;
b. This is a piss poor attempt to do some negative SEO on a rival site.

Now since codyjason has a travel site of some sorts then my money is on the latter. But whatever. He has 60 something posts on this forum and 55 of them have been about RankerX. I understand that people can be fanboys but this is just shilling for a product that's as useful as tits on a nun.

shaun · July 2016

@Johan not sure if you are on the BHW boards at all but he is always posting in their BST over there too so im guessing he is on their pay role or something.

@codyjason just out of curiosity, did the RX dev offer you a JV to help him build a SER clone?

BigGulpsHuhWelp · July 2016

RankerX is a pretty terrible product, it doesn't work and it's really poor in terms of functionality. Overall I would not recommend it. I'm not on their affiliate roll or anything like that, I did it for a while tho.

redrays · July 2016

@Johan - bravo! This thread, if it ever even was useful, has devolved into garbage. Off topic, but it also bothers me that this guy claims to be from New York when he clearly isn't from any country that uses English as a first language. Cmon dude.

micb11 · July 2016

@biggulpshuhwelp going back on topic. Why do you think it is a terrible product? I am using it for link dilution using mainly naked urls and it does the job for me.

@johan "as useful as tits on a nun" made me laugh!

Alden · July 2016

I have to be here to defend RankerX. I am one of the first customers of RankerX and are still using it.

My background when joining the forum: I came here a few years ago when I wanted to dominate all the SEO vendors on Link Emperor (check their site, they were a big hit a few years ago). I was one of their biggest vendors. Their annual revenue for the past few years was a few million each year so as one of the biggest vendors I made quite a lot. Why I told this story? Cause I had to hired several programmers to create scripts to do those SEO work (creating accounts and posting on behalf of our customers) automatically for me. And this is a daunting task (to maintain all the scripts).

No, going back to RankerX, when someone says something bad about a product, they need to provide proof! Also they need to compare it to the alternatives.

BigGulpsHuhWelp it is not fair and you did it on purpose. I watched your videos and you were an affiliate for RankerX. For every single thread related to RankerX, you were always bashing it for no particular reason (always said something like it was a bad product blah blah...) It is not helpful for anybody at all. I saw you sold SEO lists too. So I doubt you know a thing or two about SEO. Why selling the lists when you can make a lot more money doing SEO (given that you know how to do that).

Now for ones who need a software to create/post to Web 2.0 sites, what are the options for them? Let me list some:

- RankerX

- Turbo Web 2.0

- Senuke

- Magic Submitter

- FCS Networker

- RankWyz

For my own purposes, I need a software to provide a large variety of different sites. I need it to be fast and have high success rates so I can create more links and reduce my expenses (server, captchas). Now, let's compare the options:

- Turbo Web 2.0: this software uses browsers to do all the work. The result is it is slow and unstable. As a result, the success rates are poor.

- Senuke, it is a dead product. I have a lifetime license with them.

- Magic Submitter, I have not used it for a long time so no comment.

- FCS Networker, no maintenance. Anyone who wants a proof let me know. I will provide you my lifetime license for it.

- RankWyz, the success rates are better than FCS Networker but the account creator is bad and buying accounts from their account store costs a lot so it is not my option.

- RankerX, its success rates are top notch. This is my first priority. I only use sites in Social Network Premium category because I want to create my own network (which has 50k+ accounts in different niches). Basically I have something like RankWyz but hosted on my own server and more efficient.

For anyone who might think I am shilling for RankerX please give me reasons for you to say so.

thirteen13 · July 2016

I 100% agree with @Alden.

RankerX is the best tool available for creating contextual links on highly trusted websites. And following are my reasons for using this great tool:
1. It has got lot of good quality websites. You can just look at its site list here http://rankerx.com/sitelist.html and search for "premium". And its not like other tools that have tons of websites in their database but only a handful of them are working. RankerX has got BETTER SUCCESS RATES as compared to it competitors.
2. It is very fast at creating accounts and links.
3. New good sites are added frequently. They also audit the sites that are already present and update them if there is any change in premium websites database.
4. New features are added frequently.
5. Support is far much better than its competitors. For example: FCS networker support would reply after 24 hours and these guys get back to you within just 24 hours. They also provide skype support which is not provided by FCS Networker.
6. There is no such thing as "Credit" for RankerX as oppose to FCS and Rankwyz. You can create as many links as you want.
7. Its very COST EFFECTIVE i.e value for money.

Guys please don't follow comments by @BigGulpsHuhWelp as he has not provided any proof or reason for what he is saying.

BigGulpsHuhWelp · July 2016

@Alden @thirteen13

I just did not find it to have the sort of functionality and customization I expect from high quality SEO tools. It's great for people who don't have a good PBN/resources for better link building efforts. I'd love to see the user retention rate for sales at RankerX, I wonder what % of people drop it after using it for a few weeks. Probably more than 60% I'd say.

redrays · July 2016

What proof is he supposed to provide? Plenty of regulars on this forum, myself included, used RankerX for a time and stopped using it. Do you believe that we're all lying about it as part of some conspiracy?

shaun · July 2016

I got a notification saying I had been tagged in a post here although I cant see it so sorry not replying directly. Anyway, RX is a sack of shit, that being said it is still the best web 2 creator out there. That says lots about the competition. It is pretty rare that I use the product so some of this may have been updated now.

I don't like how long it takes the developer to implement basic suggestions such as include images and media along with many more I made back just after launch.
Although he has recently included the ability to include images there's little control, to my knowledge there is a little tick box that says include images. What keyword will it use to find images? How many will be used? Will there be any randomization such as between 0 and 3 images per product.
There is STILL no way to include videos to my knowledge.
To my knowledge the tool still leaves the default theme on the properties it creates.
I don't like how you can set up a custom list of sites what should by their interface be do follow only and still get around 40-50% no follow wasting human solve captcha credits.
I don't like how the dev team keep adding scripts for lower quality sites rather than focusing their time and efforts onto higher premium quality sites.
I feel the tools targeting system could be much better too, rather than making custom lists with wrong information or choosing the premium site only option have an actual tick box system like SER in their wizard where you can manually choose what you want it to build.
I know when it first came out I was also getting the odd adult based link from it, a recent blast turned out a backlink from a domain named something like bestmalewebcams.com.....really, like wtf is that....

If you read my posts in the RX BHW BST I was a total fan boy at launch, it had so much potential to dominate the market. Although it probably does currently still dominate the market it is not through the product excelling it is due to the product not having any real competition. Rather than focusing on being a product that is able to totally smash the higher quality contextuals it seems to be trying to have a platform of CMS based sites to post to as well.

When I used to talk to the RX dev he seemed obsessed on making a SER clone, even offered me a JV 50/50 to help him make something to beat SER. Although I did consider it I decided to decline the offer due to the way he runs his current products.

codyjason · July 2016

shaun : Never! I don't understand Why do people misunderstand me? I had a lot of keyword ranking rose from using RankerX. So, I just want to share my experience about RankerX, GSA to everybody. For an example with medium keyword, you can check my keywords vietnam vacations( website: www.uniotravel.com) . I created it from Jan 9, 2016, Ranking to page1- March 17, 2016.

I only hoping sharing my experience will help others. I was really disappointed. Perhaps, I should probably rethink now. I will stop share any my experience at here

BigGulpsHuhWelp · July 2016

@codyjason

So where are you actually from? Vietnam? Cause as someone above stated, it's clear you aren't from anywhere in North America.

redrays · July 2016

He is either from or living in Vietnam, just like the developer of the tool.

BigGulpsHuhWelp · July 2016

@redrays

I thought the dev team was from UK.

shaun · July 2016

To my knowledge the dev lives in hong kong (or at least did when I used to talk to him) but went to university in the UK, no idea of his nationality though.

Also....

http://imgur.com/zWTTTe0

Cody's BHW profile says he is in London.

Also, it seems he bumped an old RX thread over on BHW with the exact same post as the one he put in here...

http://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/rankerx-guide-tutorials.842724/#post-9111431

That threads a good example of why I dont post on BHW much anymore. The guys over there ate his bullshit up, over here he was challanged and questioned. To me, that says a lot!

nereupo · July 2016

codyjason : I was learned about SEO from you. I also getting the good results. Please don't stop to share your experience.

redrays · July 2016

I don't care where anyone is from, I just hate the lying. Don't list "New York" as your location if you can't speak passable English.

ALEEGS · August 2016

I have a RankerX subscription and i can definitely say that rankerX is the best web2.0 submitter at this moment. Already used turboweb (shit), magic submitter and senuke.

And i'm not affiliated with rankerx. Just a gsa and rankerx user.

Johan · August 2016

Comparing it to the competition is like arguing about who's the tallest midget.

How to Rank Top with RankerX + Scrapebox + GSA ?

Comments