I want to ask if I use rankerx for my money site then times should I use rankerx? I want to say that, how many links should I take from the same domain.
For example, if I have shortlisted my 15 articles (URLs) and on each of them say I would like to run premium sites 15 times (on each URL all premium sites run run times)
The base line is how make links should I take from a single domain with no penalty or any other risks.
I hope, I make make my self clear. If still my question is confusing let me know.
I'm using RankerX for Tier1 and Tier2 and then blast them all with GSA + Scrapebox for Tier3. I had a keyword jump from 245 to 16 in 9 days. So, It seems to work fine!
I agree with you about the image/video feature in RX. I was talking to the dev about this on skype yesterday. It's ridiculous that RX doesn't have these features until now.
But RX is still #1 in web2.0 not only because the competition is useless but also because the RX team is doing a great job maintaining these premium sites. (maintaining these sites is a huge pain in the neck) And with the price tag of $37/month it's a great deal and a great value for the money.
Can you please stop being a jerk ? you guys are not doing any good for RX that way!! using *only* rankerX will not rank you for any medium/hard keywords. You need more power for those keywords. But still it's a great tool for what it does and it's gonna help you a lot if you know what you are doing. Period.
I tend to use less GSA SER for Tier 1. I was focus more on using RankerX for building Tier 1 links, now. The alternative is FCS , but to be honest, I’ve been using FCS Networker for a long time and it’s true that It has also fallen off too much. So, RankerX really is better option on the market right now. Tier 2/3 GSA + Scrapebox
after reading rankerx tut , i try to build rankerx for tier1 . high DA site , but index rate is very low , very bad . I still use GSA for tier 1 , index rare is better than rankerx .
Focusing on numbers of backlinks, rather than the quality of them, is a common mistake. You should be clear on the fact that backlinks aren’t all equal in value. 1 high quality backlink can be worth 100+ low quality backlinks. So, I think that RankerX for Tier1 is the best option.
If you want to index Rankerx links?
Get a view older domains (i use old trusted sites right now that works the best) or/and some expired tumbler blogs
Create a sitemap stijle page and add those links you want to index, you can use anchor text or naked url but make sure they can be crawled
Now you have a view pages on different domains and thumblers, take those pages and submit them to Google submit
Now wait a day and you will see that 75% of all your links will be indexed
When the links are indexed you can remove the pages with the links, you don't want to become a linkfarm now do you?
I long for the day rx stops using the default theme and settings for the premium web 2s but i dont think it will ever happen. Also recommended more local citation sites be added. He did add a few but not enough.
Answering the initial question -> Don't use PBN still rank website ? Yes, in fact, if you want you links to stick, avoid PBN simply because they half a short life span and once they are deindexed value goes out of the window and potential penality follows.
Money robot, in my expirence have low success rate for big sites like WordPress or tumblr. Can only generate something like ampblog or amppage with 2captcha and 2000+ semi proxies. You can try it yourself, MR do have 7 day trial plan.
Comments
For example, if I have shortlisted my 15 articles (URLs) and on each of them say I would like to run premium sites 15 times (on each URL all premium sites run run times)
The base line is how make links should I take from a single domain with no penalty or any other risks.
I hope, I make make my self clear. If still my question is confusing let me know.
I agree with you about the image/video feature in RX. I was talking to the dev about this on skype yesterday. It's ridiculous that RX doesn't have these features until now.
But RX is still #1 in web2.0 not only because the competition is useless but also because the RX team is doing a great job maintaining these premium sites. (maintaining these sites is a huge pain in the neck) And with the price tag of $37/month it's a great deal and a great value for the money.
@all clones out there!
Can you please stop being a jerk ? you guys are not doing any good for RX that way!! using *only* rankerX will not rank you for any medium/hard keywords. You need more power for those keywords. But still it's a great tool for what it does and it's gonna help you a lot if you know what you are doing. Period.
high DA site , but index rate is very low , very bad .
I still use GSA for tier 1 , index rare is better than rankerx .
Sr , my english is not good
Yes, in fact, if you want you links to stick, avoid PBN simply because they half a short life span and once they are deindexed value goes out of the window and potential penality follows.