Hi, anyone who used GSA to build Tier 1 links?
faithseo
Philippines
I'm trying to figure out a way to build direct links to the money site through GSA.
I know it isn't recommended but I believe that if the list is filtered well enough, we can come up with a list of high quality sites where we can build level 1 links from.
Any thoughts?
I know it isn't recommended but I believe that if the list is filtered well enough, we can come up with a list of high quality sites where we can build level 1 links from.
Any thoughts?
Comments
I am pro SER to money site I put a fair amount of explination into that BHW thread as well as a basic method I use if I remember correctly. FC also posts his method in that thread.
I agree with @redrays as there is nothing to lose at the moment. However, if you want to use that website for years and years then better be careful in building links. Dont just build tier 1 links to any of your page using SER. You might need to create a filtering system that will build quality links to your site.
Or in my case, I do build manual links coupled with a few gigs from fiverr or people per hour then blast tier 2 and 3 links to those. Hope this helps.
Be bold, what's the worst that could happen? If the site gets hit, remove the content, get the gbot to re-crawl the penalised site again a couple times and start up another site with the same content, I can understand why people get so attached to a site with all the time and effort it takes you to set up and write content for it but all that effort isn't going to earn you money unless you're a web designer which we're not, we're SEOs.
And in all fairness, I've not yet seen any of my sites get any penalties, these -50 or -100 SERPs penalties that people speak of are very rare, this primarily happens if you're under surveillance which is manual action and basically if it does happen then I wouldn't bother with the niche anymore, most of the time, when someone sees a drop of -20 or -50 or -100 they quickly assume that it's a penalty when infact it's not, most of the time its pure link loss or tiers breaking, you'll know if you've been slapped with a penalty, the entire site will not get out of the top 50 for all keywords, not just 1 as I said, quite rare in not so competitive or "reviewed" niches monitored closely by Google and I'm saying this coming from financial niches.
Don't be afraid to go ballz deep.
@Tim89 is spot on about moving content to a fresh domain and starting over.
Link velocity is also a factor here. Don't start building 1000s of links to your money site, that's just asking for a manual review.
I've built thousands of tier 1 links to my money sites then halted to none and concentrated on tier 2 and 3 for a while with no negative impact what so ever so I have definitely ruled out link velocity, also back links are crawled and indexed at different time periods, there's not an efficient programmatic way of counting this link velocity as a ranking factor, links are found, crawled and indexed contributing to your backlink profile as an entirety, that's it.
Edit: Link loss, is a far better ranking factor
I agree there is a little bit of fear tactics involved but I think that search engines pump a lot of money and time into their anti-spam team and anti-spam algo equally to protect their income stream, it goes hand in hand.
PageRank was a massive change to their algo, it was a revolution in determining search results, that must have cost a lot during development, they have now gone to the extreme as to take it away entirely from the equation simply because it could be gamed really easily by manipulating PR, they now look at other factors to rank pages more and more, why do you think they are doing that then? Propaganda? If they are willing to throw away a metric that was once used primarily for ranking to stop SEO and or SPAMMERS then I think they are investing a lot of time and money into developing alternative ranking factors.
To be honest, they haven't got much to do anyway twiddling their thumbs in their offices so one side "improves search" and the other side "fights spam" what else is there to do if you work for a search engine???
Well, I don't know about that. Anti-spam practices could lead to your business's website being slapped, you need to get that traffic some how to keep your business floating, so you get adwords the next day.
1. It's the current year. Everyone who matters already buys Adwords and sees it as just another revenue stream. This has been the case for a very long time now. Hell, at this point Billy Bob or whoever does too.
2. A lot of money and time is relative, you yourself said they're not investing the kind of resources it would take to track link velocity
3. They took away toolbar PR, which served no purpose. PageRank was a brilliant idea, it continues to work ridiculously well (https://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4646820.htm), and they've already rolled in a bunch of other stuff, largely as a part of Panda. Links aren't going anywhere any time soon.
4. Blowing money on a bunch of unrelated, failed business ideas?
I am even surprised that they kept showing the visible updates (delayed) for so long.
The top blackhat SEO people are way ahead of Google.
I always check the SERPs for "buy viagra" related keywords.
There was a time not too long ago when it looked like Google had cleaned up the SERPs in that niche.
It DID NOT last long !!!
Using a better link source and the age of the link are big factors as to how much spam it can take, this would be another reason for not using SER at tier 1, the links it produces in comparison to a web 2 on a good platform or a PBN post are complete shit and will pop in and out of the index a lot and causing unstable bouncing rankings.
I think what is being recorded here is not the speed of the links are being built but rather a record of a single link being spammed to death (negative SEO).