My site doesnt rank.. even if I send tons of backlinks
Hi dear GSA members.
My site doesn't rank even if I sent alot of backlinks, been doing this for a week now.. it was on rank 34 now its rank 55.. Any suggestions? Im using GSA SER,GSA CB, GSA Indexer. Maybe mine indexer is bad? ty for help guys.
My niche has 9000 search per month. I have many nofollow links.. it may be the problem?
My site doesn't rank even if I sent alot of backlinks, been doing this for a week now.. it was on rank 34 now its rank 55.. Any suggestions? Im using GSA SER,GSA CB, GSA Indexer. Maybe mine indexer is bad? ty for help guys.
My niche has 9000 search per month. I have many nofollow links.. it may be the problem?
Comments
Here's a couple of quick tips for you guys:
Less is more in terms of on-page SEO. Don't worry about keyword density, write for the audience not the bots and focus more on including keywords in headings as part of a sentence. So for example, if your keyword was "best lawyer New York" a good heading might be: "7 tips to help you find the best lawyer in New York".
Did you notice that sentence does not even contain my exact keyword? It doesn't have to, it contains a variation of it and that's good enough.
Then write a few paragraphs on that topic and include a few mentions of "lawyer" and "new york". Maybe "NY", "attorney" and other LSI keywords too. This shows relevancy and should prevent you from over-optimising for one particular keyword phrase.
Internal Linking is important too, if you are not silo'ing then be sure to include plenty of internal links. 1 - 3 per article is good. Make the link as a relevant sentences - In the same manner as the headings. Link out to relevant content on authority sites every now and then too (Don't always link to a Wiki page like everyone else does lol).
Use alt tags for images with long-tail versions of your keywords and try to write as many words as possible with many LSI keywords. This gives you a great chance to rank for long-tail keywords without even targeting them directly.
@comanscm - We produced an on-page guide that was bundled with a recent list, i'll PM you some info a little later.
Many variables to consider, only a couple catalysts for ranking speeds though.
So many people over think their on page strategies, sure, it would help to have a perfectly silo'd trim website but honestly, you could rank anything for anything, just requires the right off page strategy.
Although, I have ranked for keywords which are for very untapped niches with good on page seo, but there isn't much money in them to even bother wasting time creating them.
If your site requires link building after you've created the "perfect on page" website, then it'll be the same effort to simply concentrate moreso on your off-page(linkbuilding);
BTW guys the op had dup content, hence his problems.
it's far from 'quality', but stick with the contextual (article/social network) links. platforms that are giving you a contextual backlink that sticks on the same url and doesn't roll off the frontpage like with guestbooks.
i don't want to talk bad about gsa ser, but we have to face the truth. during the last 12-18 months more and more people joined the gsa community. that's good and bad at the same time. good because more people are getting involved, more people are developing other things around gsa ser. bad because (unexperienced) people are really raping the platforms gsa is supporting. take drupal as an example, you were able to generate links from thousands of unique domains 'easily'. same with the 'shownews' platform. i think it was more in the tens of thousands than in the thousands with that platoform. buddypress would be another example. what happened ? the developers raised the security with their systems. how many drupals are you able to post to now ? a few hundred maybe, and most of them are abandoned and spammed to death installations. not what I would consider a 'quality backlink'.
so don't expect to get 'quality' backlinks from gsa ser. use some buffers like suggested above. and I would strongly recommend that you begin investing into some kind of blog network.
seo in 2014/2015 is about haven big balls and bank accounts, not big servers.
@JudderMan yes, i didn't want to say gsa ser is useless. but you also can't compare it with xrumer. the barrier to make it run is much higher compared to gsa ser. first of all it costs 6 times as much which is already enough to keep most noobs out. which doesn't mean there aren't tons of noobs with xrumer out there
then you need decent lists to get anything out of xrumer. xrumer will not help you with that. compared to that, gsa ser is able to scrape on its own, so it's very easy to run campaigns even with zero knowledge. another problem are all those list sellers. there are some lists out there that will make it hard to hit much more domains than those included in the list without heavy modding of gsa ser.
this all might sound like I think those tools are dead or close to dead. don't get me wrong here, but it's about the strategy. if you are on the hunt for 'quality' backlinks, gsa ser and xrumer are definitely the wrong tools in my opinion. everybody should face it: even if people on forums are talking about 'quality' and 'you should raise the quality settings in gsa', the links gsa ser creates are pure spam. they will never be 'quality'. no matter how high the pr of the target domain is, no matter if you are using handwritten or generated content for every article - it remains spam. beside all the benefits spam has, it has some serious drawbacks too
. so don't expect your sites ranking rock solid for years when using those tools. if that's intention gsa ser/xrumer might be the wrong tools.