Skip to content

What is the best link list provider?

truthealer07truthealer07
in GSA Search Engine Ranker
I am thinking of trying gsaserlist.net - does anyone else have any experience using this link list or maybe can recommend something better?

Comments

  • guitarfishguitarfish
    Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
  • sickseosickseo London,UK
    edited February 26
    I've lost track of how many times this question has been asked.

    I've tried all the lists atleast once. Gone back to a few lists a few months later and site numbers hadn't changed much.

    If you are still relying on the default engines and lists from list sellers - it's just not worth the time and effort - hardly any sites left that work - contextuals/profiles.

    Unless you're into blog comments with 10k+ obls, redirects and indexers links, then sure, the list sellers are pretty good for those types of sites.

    You need to be scraping your own targets and keeping up with the new engines from SERnuke.
  • sickseosickseo London,UK
    guitarfish said:
    Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
    If LPM drops, this indicates your site list contains a lot of non-working sites. If you run your projects direct from the list sellers list, then you will get very low LPM/VPM as their lists are not cleaned automatically.

    I clean my lists every couple of months which keeps the speed at peak performance.
  • dillpickledillpickle jarville
    Never heard much good about gsaserlist.net, honestly. Most people use a few bigger lists instead, they tend to be more reliable.
  • googlealchemistgooglealchemist Anywhere I want
    sickseo said:
    guitarfish said:
    Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
    If LPM drops, this indicates your site list contains a lot of non-working sites. If you run your projects direct from the list sellers list, then you will get very low LPM/VPM as their lists are not cleaned automatically.

    I clean my lists every couple of months which keeps the speed at peak performance.
    when u say you clean your lists are you talking about the settings/options/sitelists/tools 'clean up check and remove non working' function or something else?
  • sickseosickseo London,UK
    edited March 4
    Oh no. By "clean" I mean creating an empty verified folder - then processing all lists through projects to rebuild a brand new verified list. The moment that's run you have a 100% working verified list - projects will run superfast from this new verified list you've created.

    List sellers don't do this - they should but they don't. This is why their site lists and stats are always inflated because they contain sites that were once verified maybe 2 years ago lol

    If they gave you the real stats for verified links for their lists - no one would buy them lol



    Look at the date of that image taken from their site - 2022/2023  -that's the last time that project was run lol If that list seller from gsaserrlists gave you 2026 data for verified links, it would look nothing like that. 
  • AnonymousAnonymous
    googlealchemist said:
    sickseo said:
    guitarfish said:
    Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
    If LPM drops, this indicates your site list contains a lot of non-working sites. If you run your projects direct from the list sellers list, then you will get very low LPM/VPM as their lists are not cleaned automatically.

    I clean my lists every couple of months which keeps the speed at peak performance.
    when u say you clean your lists are you talking about the settings/options/sitelists/tools 'clean up check and remove non working' function or something else?
    This https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/8193/dirty-verified-lists-kill-your-lpm#latest
  • JaysonClintonJaysonClinton
    What about the link list from Asia Virtual solutions 
    Thanked by 1royalmice
  • 9tRider9tRider New wark
    edited March 18
    I am using SER verified lists because they have pretty decent targets on SERnuke engines. It's hard to use a link list without SERnuke engines. I have almost all the engines from SERnuke, and I still use all the forums from the default GSA engines. Both the verified list and the SER list are great. However, the SER list does not yet include SERnuke.
  • PeterOnePeterOne
    Used once but not much like and the pricing .I had very good results with SER verified lists. After being using years with them, I feel to give a try to another service (not because they are bad i still use their yearly plan )  and I am going to try out SER power lists and SER links. If you are running for a while, it's better to change/swap once in a while. 
  • royalmiceroyalmice WEBSITE: ---> https://asiavirtualsolutions.com | SKYPE:---> asiavirtualsolutions
    The best link list is one you create yourself and based on your niche and not share it with others. 
Sign In or Register to comment.