Skip to content

What is the best link list provider?

I am thinking of trying gsaserlist.net - does anyone else have any experience using this link list or maybe can recommend something better?

Comments

  • Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
  • sickseosickseo London,UK
    edited February 26
    I've lost track of how many times this question has been asked.

    I've tried all the lists atleast once. Gone back to a few lists a few months later and site numbers hadn't changed much.

    If you are still relying on the default engines and lists from list sellers - it's just not worth the time and effort - hardly any sites left that work - contextuals/profiles.

    Unless you're into blog comments with 10k+ obls, redirects and indexers links, then sure, the list sellers are pretty good for those types of sites.

    You need to be scraping your own targets and keeping up with the new engines from SERnuke.
  • sickseosickseo London,UK
    Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
    If LPM drops, this indicates your site list contains a lot of non-working sites. If you run your projects direct from the list sellers list, then you will get very low LPM/VPM as their lists are not cleaned automatically.

    I clean my lists every couple of months which keeps the speed at peak performance.
  • Never heard much good about gsaserlist.net, honestly. Most people use a few bigger lists instead, they tend to be more reliable.
  • googlealchemistgooglealchemist Anywhere I want
    sickseo said:
    Basic lists like all the others. I am getting OK results. There's no statistics on what your getting like some of the others that have them separated by contextual and non. Honestly, GSA SER has tanked for me and other I know that use it. Getting about 1/10th the LpM I used to get 8 years ago. I'm starting to think I'm wasting my time on GSA.
    If LPM drops, this indicates your site list contains a lot of non-working sites. If you run your projects direct from the list sellers list, then you will get very low LPM/VPM as their lists are not cleaned automatically.

    I clean my lists every couple of months which keeps the speed at peak performance.
    when u say you clean your lists are you talking about the settings/options/sitelists/tools 'clean up check and remove non working' function or something else?
  • sickseosickseo London,UK
    edited March 4
    Oh no. By "clean" I mean creating an empty verified folder - then processing all lists through projects to rebuild a brand new verified list. The moment that's run you have a 100% working verified list - projects will run superfast from this new verified list you've created.

    List sellers don't do this - they should but they don't. This is why their site lists and stats are always inflated because they contain sites that were once verified maybe 2 years ago lol

    If they gave you the real stats for verified links for their lists - no one would buy them lol



    Look at the date of that image taken from their site - 2022/2023  -that's the last time that project was run lol If that list seller from gsaserrlists gave you 2026 data for verified links, it would look nothing like that. 
Sign In or Register to comment.