Tier 1 Content
Satans_Apprentice
SERLists.com
Short of purchasing Spun Articles, can anyone make any suggestions for Tier 1 Content? Kontent Machine 3 produces unreadable nonsense, and the same is true for Rankwyz.
Maybe it's the way I am using the tools. My niche is in the IT space, and I haven't got a lot of options at this point. I'd like to be able to prepare a readable, nicely spun article in less than half an hour. Am I delusional?
Comments
Depends on how specific you want the article to be, but if you're happy with general articles it works perfectly.
30mins might be pushing it, but one 500 word article, with each sentence rewritten twice, and then spun on the word/phrase level with word AI Turing would get you decent content that's good for a few 100 articles.
I don't use it, but I've also heard good things about article builder, so maybe look at that if it covers your niche?
For example, i have a site in let's say "Security Guard Training" - I would just choose "College" as the topic in Article Builder. That works fine for me and i've done that across numerous niches.
But it's up to you of course.
Or you can go with standard superspun content, with gives you 60 - 90% uniqueness and reads perfectly. That's the option i use.
It indexes fine, actually where i've got multiple sites in the same niche. I've re-written content to the roughly the same level of uniqueness and they ranked fine too.
If you don't want to/cant go the article builder route, and you don't want to buy spun articles, then IMO (and I've researched this a lot for myself) a bit of manual work along with Word AI is the only viable way to go.
The amount of work really depends on how many articles you want to produce from one seed spintax though.
If you just want to produce a couple of articles then you could just input an article and use the turing spinner to create a couple of variations (would take a few minutes).
If you wanted more, then you could scrape a few articles, use a paragraph from each, spin them together and use the turing spinner to create a spintax that would give you say (off the top of my head) 50 articles that are unique enough to get indexed, and good enough to pass moderation. - this would probably take about 20 mins.
The next step up would be to spin them how I said in my original reply, which would create hundreds, but would probably take around 45 mins.
There's a 3 day trial period on the software, so maybe check it out and see if it works for you?
But you can spin 20 together which gives you 1000s of combinations and you can repeat that process over and over. It seems to be a totally different 20 articles each time.
As an example, i have a couple of sites that i post the content to directly just to bulk up the site a bit. It's produced about 70 unique articles so far, so i think there is plenty of content there.
Hope that helps.
I have been looking into using WordAI I heard it is good, but still need an article builder first. Do you recommend using this, Article Builder, and then using wordAI? I was unaware that it already spins it for you, and I dont want to spin things twice and make them unreadible. I was looking for something that builds an article but doesnt spin them (or if you think the above mentioned is fine). Tier 1 content, web 2.0s stuff.
So the quicker i can generate content, the better for me. Article Builder takes 30 seconds to generate an article and you can generate un-spun articles too if you want. Up to 20 articles at one time. Again it takes 30 seconds.
Next project i will use 100% scraped content and see if it makes any difference.
Of course, crap content will not pass human review and will be deleted more quickly probably.
But what i mean is next time i will 0% unique content to see what happens. AB is 60 - 90% unique.
Also, i use 60-90% unique content on my money site sometimes, re-write my own content and it ranks fine. So i don't think it will be a problem on tier 1.
Good point, @ron
I remember a thread where you and @bekkolt discussed this same thing (I'll edit this post to include the link). I've been meaning to try his method, because it's such a cut-throat approach. If the target urls allow spam submissions without moderating, why bother to be concerned about your content's quality, so long as it's unique. And Google can't tell that "My napkin shoots computers" doesn't make sense.
Now, is it more potent if the content is niche related rather than gibberish? I don't know. @bekkolt said he had great success with his method.
Here's a tip to get your content to stick on a forum and sneak pass the moderators:
Create a new thread and post a niche related post. You don't want your thread to be popular, so post something simple, or a question that can be easily answered. Don't bump your thread unless it's to say thanks to someone who answered the question.
Let your thread be forgotten as it reaches page 2 or 3 (or further if you want).
Edit your thread when you think no one will be posting to it anymore and put in the content you want and insert your anchor text.
Maybe that's too manual for some, and it requires some time, but it's good for a tier 1, especially if it's on a high PR forum.
Edited to add link:
https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/comment/23724/#Comment_23724
Since last 2 months i noticed it's way harder to rank using crap content (content scraped and shuffled) on T1.
Nice find. I know that one day spins will be detected. But I can almost guarantee that when the technology exists to detect gibberish, then there will be a tool (using the exact same technology) to create 'acceptable' spun content from a seed article. It has to work both ways because that is nearly the same technology.
I don't believe for one second that spun content is making it harder to rank. It is getting harder to index crap properties which makes things more difficult. Plus, the algo changed, so how you get rankings needs to be changed.
Every time somebody has a hard time ranking, they immediately claim spun content on tiers is the killer. I make a full time living at this, and all I use is spun tiers. I have failed websites probably 40% of the time, and not once did I ever think the content was to blame for my failed sites. There are so many factors including competition, websites that have killer natural links that you can't beat, etc. Or you can trip a filter without even knowing it. Or your anchors might be too high %. There are so many factors.
One day they will figure out the spins (and without nuking people just because they have crappy grammar). Until then, full speed ahead.