Advantages of "Manual List Scraping" vs "Always Use Keywords to Find Targets"
Yesterday it took me 15 hours to scrape 1.000.000 urls with Scrapebox (mixing 500 SER footprints with 1000 niche keywords).
Isnt is that with the option "Always Use Keywords to Find Targets" SER will (exactly like Scrapebox) just combine keywords with footprints as queries and search in all specified search engines? What exactly are the advantages of scraping lists manually with e.g. Scrapebox then?
Isnt is that with the option "Always Use Keywords to Find Targets" SER will (exactly like Scrapebox) just combine keywords with footprints as queries and search in all specified search engines? What exactly are the advantages of scraping lists manually with e.g. Scrapebox then?
- Of course you can use scrapebox on another computer and therefore use its additional CPU & RAM while SER is doing other things.
- Also you can import the target list to multiple projects if they need the same targets.
- But if i had only 1 project and enough computer power. Why would i use Scrapebox?
- And what are disadvantages of using "Always Use Keywords to Find Targets" for Tier1 projects? Without this option you will not find many niche targets right?
Tagged:
Comments
24,7% matches engine
68,8% no engine matches
3,2% filter "xyz" matches (bad words)
3,3% already parsed / already awaiting registration
Thanks for your answer @spunko2010. You said you think that "always use keywords ..." works rather for Trackbacks & BC.
Many experts on this forum use Scrapebox or Gscraper to scrape targets which works in a very similar way as the keyword option in SER. What is the advantage of SB compared to using the "always use keywords .." option (apart from what i said above)?