I just checked the website of sernuke (that I didn't know before) and I can see you are a testimonial. Are you getting good results (in google ranking) with thiese selected T1s? Thank you very much for your help
They certainly help towards the overall strategy. I've scraped well over 10k unique domains from the new engines. Still scraping more. They are good links for T1. Not available anywhere else. Nice mix of profile and contextuals, do follow and no follow.
I've not done any isolated tests with just these sites. I'm poinitng them at the homepage of all my clients sites and my own projects to boost the referring domains and authority. But once juiced up with tiers, there is no reason why they won't help with rankings.
Inside GSA SER, I use only articles, social forums, and wikis. However, I don't use any kind of bad filters or anything to filter out. I'm using Tier 1 links lost with two verified lists provided at a time. Same with RankerX. (Only articles)
They certainly help towards the overall strategy. I've scraped well over 10k unique domains from the new engines. Still scraping more. They are good links for T1. Not available anywhere else. Nice mix of profile and contextuals, do follow and no follow.
I've not done any isolated tests with just these sites. I'm poinitng them at the homepage of all my clients sites and my own projects to boost the referring domains and authority. But once juiced up with tiers, there is no reason why they won't help with rankings.
Do you use non-contextual profile links? Do you think it's a good strategy? I've seen a lot of dirty profile links from Senuke.
Non contextual links will still have the keyword in the url and the page where you create the link will also have some keyword related content if you set up your campaign to do that. So yes, there is still plenty of value in using non-contextual links. If it's do follow it still passes link juice. Makes no difference if it's a non-contextual.
If it's no follow, it will still help with rankings in search engines that treat no follow and dofollow links the same. If you're only interested in Google then it will still help with crawling/indexing links it's pointed at.
I don't discriminate in anyway with my T1 links when deciding between contextuals and non-contextuals - not with these engines as they all have low obls, so very good for pushing link juice through. Besides I'm more interested in boosting my referring domains count, so I'll use all sites available.
If you just chase contextuals all the time, you won't have many sites to play with.
lol Link velocity is not a google ranking factor. So when I run my T1 campaigns, I have no delays set. The campaign will comfortably make 10k+ links inside 24 hours. I do the same with rankerx and can send 10k new T1 links to any landing page within a few hours.
Bear in mind these links don't get crawled and indexed in a few hours. It could take weeks for google to find them naturally, in some cases months.
lol Link velocity is not a google ranking factor. So when I run my T1 campaigns, I have no delays set. The campaign will comfortably make 10k+ links inside 24 hours. I do the same with rankerx and can send 10k new T1 links to any landing page within a few hours.
Bear in mind these links don't get crawled and indexed in a few hours. It could take weeks for google to find them naturally, in some cases months.
They certainly help towards the overall strategy. I've scraped well over 10k unique domains from the new engines. Still scraping more. They are good links for T1. Not available anywhere else. Nice mix of profile and contextuals, do follow and no follow.
I've not done any isolated tests with just these sites. I'm poinitng them at the homepage of all my clients sites and my own projects to boost the referring domains and authority. But once juiced up with tiers, there is no reason why they won't help with rankings.
@sickseo Do you scrape URLs for SERnuke engines with GSA or scrapebox? And does it require a lot of IPV4?
Using Scrapebox for scraping Google. I've used 200 dedi proxies in the past for this, but can only scrape at 1 thread to avoid ip bans from google. Can literally scrape continuously for days with minimal blocks. Now i'm only using rotating data proxies to scrape Google which costs $0.50 per GB. Way faster and can run scrapebox at 500 threads. Definitely more expensive this way.
I'm also using hrefer to scrape other search engines. Seems to work better with less ip blocks. Using ipv4 - rotating mobile proxies, datacenter proxies and even storm proxies that have rotating ips. They all work quite nicely. Can scrape Bing, Yahoo, SO.com, Seznam.cz and Duck Duck Go.
Using Scrapebox for scraping Google. I've used 200 dedi proxies in the past for this, but can only scrape at 1 thread to avoid ip bans from google. Can literally scrape continuously for days with minimal blocks. Now i'm only using rotating data proxies to scrape Google which costs $0.50 per GB. Way faster and can run scrapebox at 500 threads. Definitely more expensive this way.
I'm also using hrefer to scrape other search engines. Seems to work better with less ip blocks. Using ipv4 - rotating mobile proxies, datacenter proxies and even storm proxies that have rotating ips. They all work quite nicely. Can scrape Bing, Yahoo, SO.com, Seznam.cz and Duck Duck Go.
Which proxy providers are you using? I use stormproxy but seems that many of their IPs are blocked
Comments
Are you getting good results (in google ranking) with thiese selected T1s?
Thank you very much for your help
I've not done any isolated tests with just these sites. I'm poinitng them at the homepage of all my clients sites and my own projects to boost the referring domains and authority. But once juiced up with tiers, there is no reason why they won't help with rankings.
Non contextual links will still have the keyword in the url and the page where you create the link will also have some keyword related content if you set up your campaign to do that. So yes, there is still plenty of value in using non-contextual links. If it's do follow it still passes link juice. Makes no difference if it's a non-contextual.
If it's no follow, it will still help with rankings in search engines that treat no follow and dofollow links the same. If you're only interested in Google then it will still help with crawling/indexing links it's pointed at.
I don't discriminate in anyway with my T1 links when deciding between contextuals and non-contextuals - not with these engines as they all have low obls, so very good for pushing link juice through. Besides I'm more interested in boosting my referring domains count, so I'll use all sites available.
If you just chase contextuals all the time, you won't have many sites to play with.
Bear in mind these links don't get crawled and indexed in a few hours. It could take weeks for google to find them naturally, in some cases months.
But definitely best to test what's possble.
I'm also using hrefer to scrape other search engines. Seems to work better with less ip blocks. Using ipv4 - rotating mobile proxies, datacenter proxies and even storm proxies that have rotating ips. They all work quite nicely. Can scrape Bing, Yahoo, SO.com, Seznam.cz and Duck Duck Go.
Storm proxies are no good for scraping google. All ips are already blocked. They work ok in Hrefer though.