Skip to content

Problem With Article Forge Titles

blakew1251blakew1251 San Francisco North Bay

Hello: I am importing articles via the Article Forge API, and it is importing the content, but the title is displaying as follows:

[KEYWORD.COMES.HERE]

Is this a GSA SER issue, or an Article Forge issue?

Thanks for your help.
Blake

Comments

  • blakew1251blakew1251 San Francisco North Bay

    PS: Here is a full title example:

    Who Else Wants To Know The Mystery Behind [KEYWORD.COMES.HERE]?

  • JudderManJudderMan UK
    Not sure but AF is shit for me but awesome for my friend. Same keywords produce completely different results. I spend 3-5 minutes editing each article AF produces, he can just autopost them to his sites/PBNs.

    Driving me mad.
  • blakew1251blakew1251 San Francisco North Bay

    I am still using the 5 day free trial, trying to make up my mind.

    I want to use it for GSA SER and my PBNs. The quality is not good enough for the business sites.

  • JudderManJudderMan UK
    I've used it for PBNs and money sites but heavily edited. Still beats any writer you can hire, so I'd say it's well worth the money if you do SER/PBNs.

    Even £20/500w I edit theirs a fair bit. Only my own writing is good enough for money sites really, but zero time to do any of that shit any more.


  • blakew1251blakew1251 San Francisco North Bay

    I hear that! :)

    I have been using Article Builder for years, but the content is becoming so old, as they never update the articles. I thought it would be a good idea to get some unique content on the buffer sites.

    I am now using curated content for the business sites blog posts, although I may edit some of the AF articles for those sites. Auto post in draft mode, so that I can edit and adjust the title tags and descriptions.

  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    That "[KEYWORD.COMES.HERE]" is inserted by GSA Search Engine Ranker. It will be replaced by the real anchor/keyword on submission. However I try to improve the output on next update to not confuse people.
  • JohanJohan UK
    Just to chime in on AF I thought it was limited. It's a nice idea in principle and I really wanted it to work but found I was having to edit the articles to such an extent that it would have been quicker for me to just start with a blank page and write something from scratch than faff about with it.

    Looking forward to the product that Sven has in the pipeline. There's a wide gap in the market for something decent that's for sure.
  • blakew1251blakew1251 San Francisco North Bay

    @Johan I think I agree with you.

    I cancelled my trial and am also looking forward to Sven's upcoming content product.

Sign In or Register to comment.