justdoit I have some clear doubts about this method, because obviously since last Penguin update, we know that penalties are transmited through 301. So if your domain doesn't exist in SERP, it won't be penalised...until you create your redirect, and then your money site will crash.
Logically, the "juice" of your backlinks has to go somewhere : either it's going to your "ghost" site, or it's lost. In both case, hum...
The fact is it has to be tested. Never know...If backlinks are good quality, you have a chance. But in this case, why don't you put your backlinks straight on your money site ?
@bak It doesn;t matter if your backlinks are good or not, the point is to blast that C with as much and as fast as you can, this is a chirn and burn, you will have to replace site A as it goes down. and Yes your site A will get penalized eventually, the idea is to last as long as u can then rinse and repeat, every time your site A dies, replace with new one, you dont have to touch domains C and B..
NOTE: this is not a long term ranking method, if u care about your money site, don't do this, its blackhat, if you have a conscious about it, leave it alone then.
justdoit lol, no problem with my conscious, I probably owned more than 2000 domains so far...
No, my concerns is about the timing : when do you connect C to B, and then B to A ?
With a traditionnal 301 redirect, I noticed that it was more interesting to create your spammy domain a long time ago before your money site. And then, when you have enough backlinks you connect them together. In your example there are 3 domains, so it's a bit different I guess. But because it' s a very short term ranking method, these details are very important.
Also, I was wondering if you ever tried this method recently (let's say after Penguin 3.0 mid-october), and if you got some good results with it ?
Have you ever tried it on a very concurrential and expensive CPC keyword (meaning : does it pass Pay Day Loan in your opinion, even for 2/3 days ?)
@Bak I am not in the payday loan niche, havent tried that one yet, as far as timing goes about connecting C to B, as soon as both C and B get de indexed completely by serprs, remember, i stated in the beginning using a robot.txt file and disallow all... Once you have been deindexed, its now time to connect all of them. Hope that helps..
To answer your other question, yes i use this method up to date and it is working, some niches better than others, some niches not so good...They do last more than 2-3 days...
Final note, i wouldn't worry too much about penguin 3.0, most of the trash talk out there about it is exactly that, Matt cutts and bunch of Google bozos talk trash all the time to scare ppl like us from doing spam/blackhat, in their positions they want to stop spam, it costs them alot of money and they hate it,
so they come out spreading these lies like a disease to scare us off, Especially Matt cutts, dont listen to that fag, he's full of shit... He has been saying for years many things that havent panned out to be true...
So brother, i leave you with the wisdom of, just keep blackhatting your way to riches and ignore those google bitches! LOL
@judtdoit Thanks for your help about your strategy, I find it very interesting and I already started to test it
By the way, Pay Day Loan is not a niche, i mean it is but not in my question it's also the name of Google algo that targets very expensive keywords. http://selnd.com/1s7qEYm
Very sensitive algo, very reactive also (that's why timing is so important to me), i'm playing with it since almost 6 months, burned out hundreds of domains, get a ratio of 20% success but maybe your advice will help to increase, who knows ?
@Bak checked out the link about your payday loan algo, in that case if you are going after expensive keywords, don't use them as exact anchors, and you can also build a buffer in between domain B and A.
So C redirects to B, B redirects to buffer, which buffer passes link juice to A, so we're adding another layer in between... Try that if my origial set up dont work well for you.
Comments
what's wrong ?