What I don't understand though, how comes this hasn't been implemented already? If it helps verifications and people are suffering from low verifications, wouldn't this be a good tweak?
I agree - Why not make a small fundraising if that is the issue - in order to have ALL engines updated, by getting some external manpower to deliver the updates?
5-10 $ pr. GSA User, would move a mountain and improve a lot.
In terms of the tweak, well let's implement it then - I also don't get it, why hesitate if there are many users suffering with this???
@Tim89 I did talk to sven about this and he said it will make no difference as SER should still be able to complete the process and to send him the url's of sites that give the email validation used error messages. So I guess he is fixing on a url basis or something. He also mentioned that random emails are used to cut down on spam messages we would receive to our inbox of the email accounts used in the projects.
The whole inner workings and differences of when SER uses %your e-mail% or %random_email% in the reg process I have not gone in to full details with how SER chooses what to use.
I know some INI files have %random_email% in them, those I have not changed yet but I might just to see if things improve even more. I have only changed it in the generic_fields.dat file.
Comments
What I don't understand though, how comes this hasn't been implemented already? If it helps verifications and people are suffering from low verifications, wouldn't this be a good tweak?