Kaine is there a reason for these crazy footprints in the list? I notice the scraping speed is super slow compared to what I get normally. Usually I see 34k URLs per minute with my settings and now I only get round about 250 URL per minute.
Kaine thebestindexer.com
edited March 2014
Yes it's really heavy to scrape, that why all want database
That why i want too only power user.
Kaine thebestindexer.com
edited March 2014
I receive message of member who wishes to buy our lists.
It is not for sale.
I banish without hesitation if this rule is not respected, do not take this risk !
jpvr90
edited March 2014
@Kaine i agree i hate the idea of people selling list...it only hurts SER in the long run.
anyways on topic to your post...my understanding is you are using footprints from SER and just adding "site:" operator to them? is this correct? please send more info i might be interested in this.
beamer
if there is 1 extension left? i will start to scrape it right away. if i am not too late..
I am running 600 threads through Gscraper and my CPU and Memory isn't high at all, but its moving along nicely at the moment. I don't know when it will be finished though, I have sent it to email me when when its done.
gooner SERLists.com
edited March 2014
@thunderman - I'm running Gscraper on 1500 threads. These scrapes are very slooooooow. Currently at 1500 URLs/minute.
Thunderman
I have just up'd mine to 1500 threads and the CPU and Memory didn't really respond to much so I am leaving it at that rate.
Warp Speed Ahead!!
I normally average twenty three thousand urls per minute on a normal scrape i do for my personal projects, what is your normal average @Gooner?
gooner SERLists.com
@thunderman - It depends a lot on the type of scrape, like an "inurl" scrape is really slow too. But yea, roughly the same as you i think.
Comments
anyways on topic to your post...my understanding is you are using footprints from SER and just adding "site:" operator to them? is this correct? please send more info i might be interested in this.
These scrapes are very slooooooow. Currently at 1500 URLs/minute.
But yea, roughly the same as you i think.
@gooner ok send me that at job done.