Skip to content

Reverification "Threads To Use"

londonseolondonseo London, UK
in Feature Requests

Is it possible to have a separate number of threads for reverification so that it happens quicker?

Comments

  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    No sorry, thats not planned and I don't think it's that useful.
    Thanked by 1Deeeeeeee
  • DeeeeeeeeDeeeeeeee the Americas
    What's going on, @LondonSEO...
    You could write a utility that does the verification, taking the burden off SER.
    Sven, is there any issue with doing that external to SER? Thank you. :)
  • londonseolondonseo London, UK
    Deeeeeeee said:
    What's going on, @LondonSEO...
    You could write a utility that does the verification, taking the burden off SER.
    Sven, is there any issue with doing that external to SER? Thank you. :)

    How do I write this utility?
  • DeeeeeeeeDeeeeeeee the Americas
    edited October 24
    londonseo said

    How do I write this utility?

    @Londonseo, I am just guessing...it seems that SER keep track of itself for other functions regarding URLs like posting, etc.
    But re-verification, as far as I can tell, just means moving the URLs and data to the Failed Re-verification file for that project from the Verified List if a URL is not returning 202. So you just hit your URL, check for 202, and then do nothing or delete the entry in one file and make the same entry in the other. That's really only a few steps. You can auto-check all projects or specify certain ones and even set a time. But I guess the big issue is running multiple threads, not just a single check at a time! :| That part would be more involved... anyone with any ideas on any of this? Is it just moving the entries like it seems?
Sign In or Register to comment.