Content Foundry VS Kontent Machine
Vincent
in Need Help
Content Foundry or Kontent Machine? Any expert here can give me a advise please? Which content generator is better when I run C&B projects?
Comments
For example I use all sources in SEO CM:
Scrape Content - Google
Article Directories - built ones and custom
Local Files - I have an enormous database of PLR articles gathered throughout the years
Article Builder - I have a paid subscription
Big Content Search - Again paid for subscription
When I want unique and quick content I just select all of those and produce a massive super-spun article. It's fast and the result is great.
If you want to make it even more unique you can produce say one article with 2-3 paragraphs using a more general keyword from your niche, and then produce one more article with only one paragraph for your specific niche and then mash all of that together. Your article will be 100% unique and to the point, just make sure you use custom titles. You can find ways to generate them. If you can't or don't have time, use the titles generated from your second article with 1 paragraph so they can be niche specific.
SEO Content Machine rules! I'm discovering new abilities with it every day and I'm still getting surprised I had not clue some existed. Believe me, it's the best investment you can do with content. Remember: the quality of the software can be seen by the way it's developer treats his user-base and how he deals with the new ideas they might have. Seo CM is one of those rare devs that listens to his community very closely with his ideas voting system.
Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to try the other tools yet. The best thing you can do is to sign up for a trial and see which one works best for you.
For example the content cache control for CF is better than SCM, KM3 and WAC. This mean making custom exports, and not having to scrape anymore after you have a content cache. I've tried this with both KM3 and SCM and it took ages to work with local content. I mean over an hour of processing.
Another VERY big point, KM3 and SCM don't seem to use spinfile tags, you actually load text content into GSA projects instead of referencing files with the XRumer format. It's means your variation of output is tiny in comparrison to CF and XR. You can't load enough content to have 100k (or even 10k) unique submissions because of 32-bit memory limitations.
@KontentMachine I think you should also prevent KM3 from scraping content when working with local files, it's not in the work flow anyway and seriously slows things down. For example you select "no images" and KM will still try to scrape images when processing!
Don't buy Content Foundry, because even though it's still the best scraper/content manager, the GSA functions are broken.
I hope KM and/or SCM pick up the pieces and gear their software more towards scale.
It's a real shame because if the dev carried on developing it (he disappeared August last year) it would hands-down be the best solution.
At the moment I'm using 3-4 programs to create the content/projects because no one software does everything properly.
It's not creating GSA projects from a plain template. It's always had a few querks but it's not working for me at all at the moment. I guess the GSA project file format has changed since CF was updated 8 months ago.
BTW, you mentioned you use 3-4 programs to create the content/projects. If you don't mind, can you please tell us which are they & how they work together (or how do you set them tasks)? I believe this will be very valuable for all people interested in this thread.
Thank you again, team74
Km is nice also since it like a 1 push button. It just need more features that scm has.