Basic SER Settings for Large Number of URLs (500+ URLs)
I have been looking at how to do this most efficiently for 4 or 5 hours now, and I must be brain dead. I am promoting 500+ URLs. Each of these pages is optimized for a keyword. It should also be noted that these pages are all thematically organized via a hierarchy of breadcrumbs and through inter-linking.
As a example these are thematically related:
Home » Services » Virus and Spyware Removal » Facebook Virus Removal
Home » Services » Virus and Spyware Removal » Trojan Horse Virus Removal
while this is not:
Home » Services » Computer Networking » Linksys Router Setup
I want to build links with the following anchor text distribution:
10% keyword I am trying to rank for (e.g. facebook virus removal)
10% lsi using no root keys from keyword pulling from a pool of 7-15 lsi's per keyword
35% naked URLs (http:www.domain.com, http://domain.com...)
45% One off anchors (click here to learn more, and so on...)
That all being said, with 500 urls like this, setting up the lower section of a project for anchor text is confusing.
I have 500 URL fields up top that look just like this one (url and anchor):
http://domain.com/services/computer-networking/linksys-router-setup/#linksys router setup
I have Anchor text variations set at 10% (this would be "Linksys Router Setup" or "linksys router setup", or "Linksys router setup"
I have Generic anchor text set at 45% (pulls right from the Edit file)
I have Domain as anchor tet set at 35% (http://domain.com, http://www.domain.com, www.Domain.com...)
I have LSI anchor text set at 10% <----- I need help here
Now here are my two questions:
1. How do I keep a relationship between the URL and the LSI. I do not want links being built to a virus removal page that use anchor text like "linksys router setup" that are not related
All I can see is the ability to use a spin folder, which is cool, but I have many unrelated search terms here and I cannot pull LSIs that are totally unrelated.... well I guess I could, but isn't that a poor way to do it.
2. Does it make sense to group this project into smaller projects that each are more thematically related to avoid this, or is there a slick way to pull this off in GSA
Thank you,
As a example these are thematically related:
Home » Services » Virus and Spyware Removal » Facebook Virus Removal
Home » Services » Virus and Spyware Removal » Trojan Horse Virus Removal
while this is not:
Home » Services » Computer Networking » Linksys Router Setup
I want to build links with the following anchor text distribution:
10% keyword I am trying to rank for (e.g. facebook virus removal)
10% lsi using no root keys from keyword pulling from a pool of 7-15 lsi's per keyword
35% naked URLs (http:www.domain.com, http://domain.com...)
45% One off anchors (click here to learn more, and so on...)
That all being said, with 500 urls like this, setting up the lower section of a project for anchor text is confusing.
I have 500 URL fields up top that look just like this one (url and anchor):
http://domain.com/services/computer-networking/linksys-router-setup/#linksys router setup
I have Anchor text variations set at 10% (this would be "Linksys Router Setup" or "linksys router setup", or "Linksys router setup"
I have Generic anchor text set at 45% (pulls right from the Edit file)
I have Domain as anchor tet set at 35% (http://domain.com, http://www.domain.com, www.Domain.com...)
I have LSI anchor text set at 10% <----- I need help here
Now here are my two questions:
1. How do I keep a relationship between the URL and the LSI. I do not want links being built to a virus removal page that use anchor text like "linksys router setup" that are not related
All I can see is the ability to use a spin folder, which is cool, but I have many unrelated search terms here and I cannot pull LSIs that are totally unrelated.... well I guess I could, but isn't that a poor way to do it.
2. Does it make sense to group this project into smaller projects that each are more thematically related to avoid this, or is there a slick way to pull this off in GSA
Thank you,
Tagged:
Comments