Full Vs. Quick indexer?
edited December 2013 in GSA SEO Indexer
I did a google search but did not find a comparison. Wondering which settings you guys use to keep SER at optimal levels. I just have it set to quick, and send everything in indexer, but maybe that isnt good. Oh, and "only deep links". What are your settings that produce good results (indexing, and also SER speeds)
I'm using quick indexing, but I thinks very few (or no one) urls are indexed really now.
I agree with mlsto, I'm also using only quick indexer, because the full takes soooo long time to finish the job.
Ok, the price of this tool is very low, but.... is it really working well?
Well it is working, but of course you can not grantee it is indexing each and every URL for you in 0 seconds. Using the full indexer is giving better results of course but as seen, takes longer. If you want to have it finish faster, use more threads. Quick indexer is taking 500 random sites from the database to do the submission. I am not suggesting to take only deep links option here.
About indexing, of course I don't mean I want the index of an Url in 0 seconds. I'm checking the index after 1 week, 2 weeks, etc. I actually got some results 2 weeks after have used Gsa Index, and for some of the links, not many.
So.... not so bad, not so good :-)
I started with the quick option, then I tried with custom 800, now I'm using custom 1,000.
I think you should test and try to increase the number of sites depending of the resources you have.
FOr example, with quick index, the GSA Indexer was faster than GSA Ser, but with full index, GSA Indexer was very slower than Gsa Ser (if you stop Gsa Ser, Gsa Indexer go on for long time until it finish the already verified urls).
SO just try to increase the sites, until more or less the 2 tools go at the same velocity.
Of course, you also have to balance the threads of both tools
Although I do have it checked "only sites that can index deep links" but that shouldnt go from 5000 to 386.