How can I Improve...
Verified Urls?
I'm making a lot of Article submissions but so far I've only reached 5 verified URLS?..
That ain't good is it?..I'd say that's pants...
I'm making a lot of Article submissions but so far I've only reached 5 verified URLS?..
That ain't good is it?..I'd say that's pants...
Comments
What details do I need to provide?..
Thanks
- article friendly
- article dashboard
- WP
- and some others
usually are all pending approval - which can take from days to many months to neverafter submission you have NO knowledge of later live URL
hence verification LATER very complex (but possible)
- do a site search for author
- check author submission page with all article live
- login and check status (pending, rejected, live) = needs captcha = $. such status messages may be different depending on platform
also a.m. and similar old fashioned article platforms have a "author resource box" a seperate unitt from text, and a small profile, with a well defined chars max length (mostly 250 chars incl HTML for links for resource box) and max link number (2 max 3 usually). typically no contextual links except blog article sites and wikisif submitting with longer conventional "profile" as acceptable for wikis or blogs, etc
mostly articles get auto-rejected with or without notification
and since mostly pending approval (except AB, AS and WP)
needless to say that all articles need to be human readable, else account banned
many of article sites have low PR N/A or PR 0
the higher the fewer sites you find
hence to find anything at all for submission be sure to have all low PR open for submission
there might be many more NON-functioning article sites of a.m. type than working once
best for me are always wikis, drupal, joomla, some web20 and some social networking sites
Thanks.
1
conventional article sites are meant to be supplied with quality human readable articles again and again
on same account by same author using same name / email address
may be every few days or week a new unique article
all life long if author creative and productive
and strictly SELF-created content
hence you normally use ONE = true name for one account per site
all life long
honest WH publishers have NO need to fear creating footprint of publishing or hiding true ID
that's why G introduced years ago the feature to register (all) your sharing accounts on major article publishing sites,
see YOUR G profile > about > Contributor to ...
that's where publishers ADD all major sites they use as publishing platform
2.
some sites / platforms require first a "pen name" with its own full profile to be configures before article submissions can begin
AMR as well as other online article submission services create account PLUS pen name automatically
NOT sure if SER is configured to do that
else articles may be pending or rejected
3.
for the conventional article directory submissions, I created
one separate project = duplicate from other
except I uncheck all wiki, blog etc
and checked only the OLD-fashioned article directory
and have minimum PR0 since most such sites are PR0 and few only above
that submission LpM is very slow and is run only every once in a while
using the matching "author resource box" format
while all efficient articles joomla, drupal, wikis, etc
are on main projects
using extended profiles
4
while in the current SER you can submit multiple articles to same site
it is NOT efficiently possible to have ONE project with ANY number of articles, submitted to SAME sites
and thus SER
is NOT really ideal for a regular NEW article publishing like in AMR or others specialized in articles (stricly WH)
SER seems more for webspam or BH (to meet the apparent need of majority of SEO customers)
rather than for feeding the web on unique quality educational content, web20 or article or blog accounts with human readable quality content
when you feed the world with quality articles on quality article sites
you feed ALL sites at once (that's what I did all the past years without any problems}
when a publishing house prints xx thousand copies of a daily newspaper
it sells ALL the same day rather than 100 each day
quality content on blogs or article sites create substantial generic traffic free from any SE
finally
since using SER
I simple changed from article submission on traditional sites
to other article submission platforms
without the old fashioned article sites = submissions FAR more efficient, faster and MANY more sites across the globe available
the quality factor is a matter of self-control and conscience = you have it and succeed or have none and fail
I have 1 tiny article project just for those sites
and all else by NEW projects all with the old fashioned article sites UN-checked
that latter method brings about 5-10 x more LpM compared to old fashioned article sites
speed UP your LpM by UN-checking all failing platforms
that saves resources
then focus on those few platforms that bring HIGH % verified and remain verified possibly for life or for as long as site live
ti's boring and wasteful to submit to sites just for a temporary BL and see your submissions deleted after a day or a few days
Good sites who love good content keep your content forever
and thus offer lasting BLs forever
Good luck
Well penname is added, else show me where this did not happen. Author name is just required once for registration. Thats kept and not changed onwards.
If you want to use your real name here, you can modify names.dat and lnames.dat file with your real name.
But I agree that article management is not optimal and will be changed. Today I worked on account management which had to be done before that one. So keep waiting for a better article content management in project options.
But beside that, I don't see much room in optimizing the workflow.
because comparing old fashioned article sites (article friendly, dashboard, etc) with modern content publishing sites, blogs, web20, drupal, wikis, etc
it is obvious that article sites are too inefficient and may be a piece of history when compared to other content sharing / distributing options SER offers
but account management on all levels to re-FEED accounts with ever occurring NEW quality content may be far more exciting and efficient to drive generic traffic to a money-site
accounts such as
wiki
blogs (drupal, joomla, etc)
micro blogging
web20
etc can / could receive NEW content / mini-content as often as possible and may create readers / followers
posting on a scheduled basis ( every x days / xx hrs ) may be unhappy
what if you have nothing NEW ready for posting but posting scheduled - resubmit same respun article is no quality option
better an automatic trigger function such as
submit to all accounts if NEW content file is present in any of the existing %spinfolder-<folder>% or any similar suitable macro
this may be daily for those requiring little work such as micro-blogging
or every few days or weeks for article requiring more work
regularly or more likely irregularly
old posts could be submitted to new sites in addition to most recent posts to assure all sites are fully fed and all followers happy
the importance is to maintain accounts by supplying quality content
IMO the chance of having accounts / content deleted by site owner reduces the more quality content you add
a very same principle applies to PR sites
the norm seems to be that Press Releases are written / published in 3rd person about a company
spinning is of lesser or no importance, correct spelling and precise content of HIGH priority
URLs usually are inserted as URL (only some paid PR accounts usually offer anchor texts.
PR still are meant to be press-release = for printed media and the SEO effect for web-distribution is of secondary side-effect
large PR sites seem to require an email @ own domain
such as
prlog.org
G loves PR if done on large sites
for quality reason I strictly do manually
but it could be done automatically of course and then used to announce more often activities
once you have an existing "press room" account ,you never mess around with cheap spin content, PR is a treasure grove