GSA & Manually Spun Content For Tier 1?
Hi Guys,
My tiered link building campaign is currently made up of web 2.0 platforms for my tier 1. Content on these have been manually spun by myself and I output them using the best spinner and post on each platform manually. My tier 2 & 3 is made up of content generated from Kontent Machine and I use GSA to build the links. For indexing I use GSA guestbook posting & scrapebox auto approve comments on tiers 2 and 3.
To create more Tier 1 links however, would creating a campaign using manually spun content and GSA be ok using the following settings.
Submit to:
Article
Web 2.0
I would then create a list of keywords and LSI keywords, and tick the box "use keywords as anchor text", so im getting variation there, along with using generic terms 33% and domain as anchor text 33%.
Would this be considered "safe" for my money site?
My tiered link building campaign is currently made up of web 2.0 platforms for my tier 1. Content on these have been manually spun by myself and I output them using the best spinner and post on each platform manually. My tier 2 & 3 is made up of content generated from Kontent Machine and I use GSA to build the links. For indexing I use GSA guestbook posting & scrapebox auto approve comments on tiers 2 and 3.
To create more Tier 1 links however, would creating a campaign using manually spun content and GSA be ok using the following settings.
Submit to:
Article
Web 2.0
Wiki
No more than 50 OBL per page
Must have PR 2 or more
Id stop the campaign after no more than 30 links have been verified daily.
No more than 50 OBL per page
Must have PR 2 or more
Id stop the campaign after no more than 30 links have been verified daily.
I would then create a list of keywords and LSI keywords, and tick the box "use keywords as anchor text", so im getting variation there, along with using generic terms 33% and domain as anchor text 33%.
Would this be considered "safe" for my money site?
Comments
I don't use SER for web2.0 as the engines very rarely works, so instead I use Magic Submitter, Rankwyz or FCS networker.
You could always continue to build the manually.
Does anyone else have any input on the matter?
On a side note, is GSA suitable tool for directory submissions? Im asking as before i purchased GSA i was considering getting sliq or phpd submitter i think it was called.
I was wondering, that if i use manually spun content, if id be able to use GSA to submit to directories without having to get another piece of software?
As far as GSA goes and in general I would say it is best suited to quantity rather then quality.
FCS Networker is very much similar to Rankwyz although Rankwyz is more feature rich and makes the setting of auto content a lot easier, you can do the same with FCS, it just takes more work.
Does Rankwyz allow me to enter web 2,0 platforms ive already created and just post to them?
If Rankwyz is a bit too much, try FCS first as it's a bit cheaper. You can do the exact same thing, but it might just be a bit more work with FCS