why does majestic show almost 80% other anchour when i did only a fraciton of that in SER?

PeterParker

I think i have 33% other, 20% domain and 13% alternate/partial match.

in majestic tho it shows NONE of my actual anchours i want to rank for and only anchours for internal links- so the internal links are the anchours about 5% for each page , 15% or so for domain and 70% other.

big discrepancy form what i put into gsa.

any explanation for this?

i know my shitty site hasnt been getting backlinks form any other place

as a side note looking at top 10s in majestic anchour text seems to have fuck all correlation with rank. theres no pattern from what i can see of top 10s as there are all types of different anchour profiles ranking.

Sven

Sorry I don't know your settings in SER. What does our statistics say to your anchors? Keep in mind that some engines build links with there own anchor text (e.g. Trackback-Format2, some guestbooks and so on).

2Take2

Majestic probably just hasn't found all of your links, bearing in mind that your contextual links will most likely be on brand new pages that majestic is unaware of, whereas your generic links will probably be found on existing pages of things like blogs and social bookmarking sites that are crawled often.

PeterParker

good point.

ill look in gsa stats then and sb link checker

ye it looks alot more verified when i look in gsa verified links

2Take2

I wouldn't get too hung up on it.

As far a I can see from my test domains that I've spammed heavily the settings on SER are pretty accurate, probably better to spend the time scraping new target lists or building new links.