OK. I looked at my tiered projects and don't see any options to check, so what I did is removed <a href="%url%">%anchor_text%</a> from my super spun article and unchecked the box "Automatically insert your URL at the bottom (else in between article) if required" so the anchor and link will be inserted within the article.
Just confused as to were the generic anchor will be placed.
This anchor text change is a good idea, but it may explain the new link issue I just noticed. I posted it in the "Bugs" section (https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/4364/link-macro-not-closing-with-endquote). the %link% macro is not properly closing the link with an endquote ( a href="mywebsite.com ) when it should be ( a href="mywebsite.com" ).
@sven should say what is the reason for that. What @Glennf is using to insert the anchors is a viable way, because this ensures they are 100% contextual. With the way @Glennf is using it the Auto Anchor would not have to be inserted.
The auto anchor is used when the anchor text GSA has randomly selected can not be found in text (happens, we are dealing with spun text so it is inevitable). The auto anchor then inserts a sentence similar to this: For more info on ANCHOR TEXT.
There is nothing you have to turn on. The generic anchor is inserted like "<original_anchor_as_text_only> (<generic_anchor_with_link_under_it>). It is happening automatically.
I'm still confused. I looked at a blog post and one of my anchors gets posted like this...
Here is my homepage :: myanchortext (myurl)
The URL is in parentheses
Is is OK to just use a highly spun document with NO macros to embed <a href="%url%">%anchor_text%</a> or %link% within my articles and unchecked the box "Automatically insert your URL at the bottom (else in
between article) if required" so the anchor and link will be inserted
within the article.
Is is OK to just use a highly spun document with NO macros to embed
<a href="%url%">%anchor_text%</a> or %link% within my
articles and unchecked the box "Automatically insert your URL at the
bottom (else in
between article) if required" so the anchor and link will be inserted
within the article.
Comments
@gamble4living im sure @Sven will take a look and find the bug.
Right now I use a program to insert <a href="%url%">%anchor_text%</a> into a highly spun article and it basically make it a contextual backlink.
The problem is when it inserts a generic anchor the link looks unnatural. For instance.
We had a lot of fun putting this article together because this subject of "mouse click the upcoming internet site" really fascinates us.
"mouse click the upcoming internet site" is the generic anchor with the hyperlink point to a money site URL or Tx URL.
What do I need to do in SER to make my primary, secondary and generic anchors look and read natural?
Just confused as to were the generic anchor will be placed.
I am not using macros in my spun articles.
@sven should say what is the reason for that. What @Glennf is using to insert the anchors is a viable way, because this ensures they are 100% contextual. With the way @Glennf is using it the Auto Anchor would not have to be inserted.
For more info on ANCHOR TEXT.
Here is my homepage :: myanchortext (myurl)
The URL is in parentheses
Is is OK to just use a highly spun document with NO macros to embed <a href="%url%">%anchor_text%</a> or %link% within my articles and unchecked the box "Automatically insert your URL at the bottom (else in between article) if required" so the anchor and link will be inserted within the article.
Is is OK to just use a highly spun document with NO macros to embed <a href="%url%">%anchor_text%</a> or %link% within my articles and unchecked the box "Automatically insert your URL at the bottom (else in between article) if required" so the anchor and link will be inserted within the article.
@Glennf yes you can do that. The sentence which is added to the bottom is than put in-between the article.
@AlexR, this is only working for the article input field. And no I will not add support for other fields.