Depends on how many submissions you want to make. In the end it's all about duplicate content....not having it is working in your favour in terms of SEO.
i created the article and i checked if it is duplicated or not so i am not worrying about it i also spinned it
my question is i created an article spined it with 3 version , shall i create another and do the same or the one i did is enough.
my other question is if will only target quality links ( i will add filter in gsa ) not quantities like for example one link per day can i use my money site direct in the gsa ( the site is 1.5 year old and i am already ranking for some low volume keywords )
george_kaiser 1.I guess it depends how many times you allow each article to be used in SER use for posting. Spin all you want but 1 article and 3 variations will start creating dups and likely some rubbish over and over again quickly. I think you need a lot more articles for even small project. I guess there a lot of other factors too.
2.Well a site that's a few years old and ranking for some keywords. I would shoot for smaller campaign and monitor effects. Starting with less links but on higher quality sites will provide better results I would agree.
ok now i am a bit confused as i see a lot of tutorial spinning articles
. i understood from you that i can add for example five normal articles
without spinning them i mean for example that i will not use " {} or |
" i just add many article to the project and the GSA will
rotate them correct better than spinning commenting one your second point " you are talking about if i will use my money site directly correct ?"
Comments
ok now i am a bit confused as i see a lot of tutorial spinning articles . i understood from you that i can add for example five normal articles without spinning them i mean for example that i will not use " {} or | " i just add many article to the project and the GSA will rotate them correct better than spinning
commenting one your second point " you are talking about if i will use my money site directly correct ?"