Skip to content

A couple of GSA-SER questions

1- How long does it usally take you to see results in your GSA-SEr projects?
2 - Do you build link to your money sites or just to the tiers?
3- Has any of your websites been deindexed because of using GSA-SER too much?

Comments

  • petpetpetvmpetpetpetvm United States
    edited June 10
    1- How long does it usally take you to see results in your GSA-SEr projects?
    It depends on many different factors. However, the main factor is how you're using it, how you insert data info posts/comments/..., which sites you are picking, which emails and proxies you are using ....

    2 - Do you build link to your money sites or just to the tiers?
    I do use SER for my money sites and tiers. However, you only should do it when you trust yourself and have some basic understanding about SER, about backlinks. Since I'm still new into SEO, and SER was my first automated tool for backlinks, I already received some good results using SER. This is my position tracking from SEMRush for a new money site, and May 5 was the day I started trying SER:

    Even though I spent a good amount of money buying tier 1 backlinks but got hard time indexing all of those backlinks, I believe that SER significantly helped me on indexing those links with building some more T1 links, which helped on improving the rank.

    For comparing, following is from another money site, that I pretty much spent the same amount of money for backlinks, but didn't use SER at all:



    3- Has any of your websites been deindexed because of using GSA-SER too much?
    Since I'm still a newbie, I will leave this one for others. However, like many others who trust themselves, I don't think it would happen to me.


  • 3- Has any of your websites been deindexed because of using GSA-SER too much?
    Since I'm still a newbie, I will leave this one for others. However, like many others who trust themselves, I don't think it would happen to me.
    I don't think Google will penalize a site just because of a few bad links. It considers other factors too.

    If the content is thin and you are using the tool excessively with a crazy amount of backlinks per day, sure, the risk is there. But that is just one of the factors. This is one of the reasons there is no such thing as negative SEO, and whenever a competitor blasts a site with a lot of porn anchor text, the site becomes stronger. This happened to one of my sites where I was originally creating backlinks with good GSA campaigns. At the same time, my competitor used to blast tons of links, including trackbacks, and nothing happened. The site is still there, and I can still see those anchor texts in Ahrefs, lol.

    Thanked by 1petpetpetvm
  • That is funny you mentioned that and it's great point! Years ago even, I shared some money sites on a live call explaining how to do something and of course some funny guy blasted the site with some pretty silly anchors.

    There's one in every bunch. . . But same result nothing happened to site negatively. I think it would have to be a brand new site that gets blasted or one with no real foundation in search yet to have bad effect. I'm sure there a ton of different scenarios for this as well, result wise anyway.
  • petpetpetvmpetpetpetvm United States
    I’m totally agreed with you guys. Let’s think it’s this way:
    - Backlinks are like how popular your site is, how often people on different sites mentioned your site. It’s kinda nonsense if someone else’s actions are affecting your site unless it’s obviously your action of spamming.
  • petpetpetvm that's exactly how I think and approach it. Even when building link campaigns especially if its with automation, if it does not make sense in a "real world" scenario, I think well maybe there is a better way. I mean humans (maybe a few lizards) program the search indexers and create rules for these likely based on logic from real world examples and the adding "spam" filters/rules as they learn and grow trying to make search engine results better.

    I remember when I was way younger when you would type in something like "Radio Control Car" and the first page of results would be all same website just in different color. Likely all the same owners or a few stealing each others source code. Or people would get away with randomDomain/keyword/keyword/keyword. This is also around time social bookmarking for backlinks was sometimes optional only. There was even a free website social something you add your title, description and tags, check off what sites you want social bookmarks on and that was that. It was almost like manually pinging from a website.  Or backlinks was purely a numbers game. Boy times have sure changed.

    I'm not big spammer (just automation junkie) so I have really no issue with this but I still pay mind to it especially if it's not my site. For easy example, would it make sense that a new site has all these people commenting on blogs about it yet they have not one social media account linking to them or any content on any major sites that would have given them some visability to begin with? Probably not. Likely that would just make it look unnatural or a like a link profile going from 0 -1000 overnight then nothing with with all strong commercial anchor text pointing back at it? Its kinda like your walking and you see a NEW pizza restaurant and its not quite open yet, but is has all these rated #1 from xyz magazines. For me that does not pass that "sniff test". Of course some will get away with it, some will be made examples off, and then there's those that send complaints  :/

    Either way search def changes and results are different for everyone, but for me its better to play on safe side especially to begin with. And speaking of search I get email "how to shut Googles AI off" its giving random horrible results telling people to do weird things. Now one of my browsers is doing the AI thing which is really annoying for me. This I am assuming is the Google Gemeni? Has anyone had chance to play with this model yet? I believe its available in Google developers console.
    Thanked by 1petpetpetvm
Sign In or Register to comment.