Why GSA Verified List Web 2.0 Can Not Be Submitted
OverOperation
Hong Kong
in Need Help
I bought verified list from 2 large websites and there are many lists but none of them can be submitted. Please kindly help!
Comments
and I have bought the Recapatcha 2 and set up.
Please see the log: https://pastebin.com/vX1NDvmm
For SerLib, I have bought in another VPS and running good.
Please carefully review my photos and advise why my verified web 2.0 pages can not be posted
Can you please give me a detailed instruction regarding how to do this.
my status is I bought some verified list for web 2.0 and wiki, but I can not use GSA SER to post them.
Some people said it is because the Recaptcha V2 V3 problem that make me failed to post web 2.0, and please advise the points your find and I will do it to post my web 2.0 and wikii in GSA successfully.
Thank you very much!
I am new in GSA and I need your help!
But according to this guy's screenshot, the instructions are quite different. Can you elaborate on this?
I also don't think those web2.0s are from a link list. It's mostly from web2.0s addon like serengines or lib and since the user use the same folder to feed and write it still there which is worthless. There is no point to use feed those web2.0s as they are engine based.and.self
Translated done by llma.pardon if confusions
Pretty sure I make more screenshots here then most, there is even one in the comment above?
I mean he's got engines that dont work check of and then trying to post to add-on links without the add-on???? Whether they are his blogs/profiles or scraped and added to list, I dont know.
Also why I do help around with support, I am not a mod here or on GSA "team". I am user like you just sharing experiences with people asking for help.
Main point if those types of links are in your verfied list Database you are not working with a verified list!
Also, there are many ways to filter them from the get go no matter how you are creating a list for SER so they should not end up anyways, they should never even be indentified as SER friendly URL really.
As long as we write into fresh folder there should not have any issues.
I mean just talking with group SEO's speaking all English on live call can be confusing, so I can see some issues here now with communication. I assume the username 9trider new wark maybe you were some guy from New Jersey who likes motorcycles
I think sometimes if I'm on the go with laptop without mouse, my "mouse pad" will do some funny things like rearrange sentence, or delete if my thumb hits while I'm typing, so likely that's not helping either.
I agree, about the folders and think that that's why the extra custom folder was added. Your explanation of basic folder operation is similar to how I understand it. People use them all kinds of ways though, for example the failed folder I've known people who use it for other purposes while originally I think it's there for debugging. However the guy above, his main issues are what sven said about API and what he's expecting from "web 2.0" links in general. I think that is the biggest issue to sort out first. He's checking off web 2.0 in engine pane which has access to a few web 2.0 scripts that would need updating to work. Then he is asking why he cant post to links that SER by default cannot post to and confusing web 2.0 group with web 2.0 in general it seems . . .
Anyways.. enjoy your weekend!