Replicate keywords into Anchor Text
![rastarr](https://forum.gsa-online.de/uploads/userpics/S98XYYWDH5G4/nFYX9ZPXZ671B.jpg)
Hey @Sven
I just noticed a peculiar glitch, of sorts
I duplicated a project since it contained mail accounts etc which saves some time in other projects. The new project was on a different topic so the keywords are different.
I always use and tick the box 'Use keywords as anchor text'.
Note that the 'Anchor Text (based on Main Keyword)' section did contain unrelated keywords, however, they're greyed out. I assumed these are negated and never used.
However, in testing some articles, I noticed that random article titles (and I presume other content) were pulling the wrong Anchor Text from this greyed-out field.
Is this a bug?
Shouldn't the 'Keywords' be transposed/duplicated into the 'Anchor Text' field if the 'Use keywords as anchor text' box is ticked?
![Image: https://forum.gsa-online.de/uploads/editor/0f/0jy5fcdb5tir.jpg](https://forum.gsa-online.de/uploads/editor/0f/0jy5fcdb5tir.jpg)
Edit: %generate_title% was being used on the article. Perhaps this is wrongly pulling that greyed-out field
I just noticed a peculiar glitch, of sorts
I duplicated a project since it contained mail accounts etc which saves some time in other projects. The new project was on a different topic so the keywords are different.
I always use and tick the box 'Use keywords as anchor text'.
Note that the 'Anchor Text (based on Main Keyword)' section did contain unrelated keywords, however, they're greyed out. I assumed these are negated and never used.
However, in testing some articles, I noticed that random article titles (and I presume other content) were pulling the wrong Anchor Text from this greyed-out field.
Is this a bug?
Shouldn't the 'Keywords' be transposed/duplicated into the 'Anchor Text' field if the 'Use keywords as anchor text' box is ticked?
![Image: https://forum.gsa-online.de/uploads/editor/0f/0jy5fcdb5tir.jpg](https://forum.gsa-online.de/uploads/editor/0f/0jy5fcdb5tir.jpg)
Edit: %generate_title% was being used on the article. Perhaps this is wrongly pulling that greyed-out field
Comments