Hi all. Who uses OpenAI for automatic content creation ? I encountered a problem that OpenAI takes a very long time to generate text, how can I speed up and automate this work? Is there any documentation? Thank you.
Hi all. Who uses OpenAI for automatic content creation ? I encountered a problem that OpenAI takes a very long time to generate text, how can I speed up and automate this work? Is there any documentation? Thank you.
I am also facing this issue. More than 50% of my OpenAI articles failed to generate after waited for a long time. So I stop using OpenAI integrated inside SER and use OpenAI website instead.
When using OpenAI, stick to the gpt-3.5-turbo model, it's the best quality for speed and price.
Why do we need to pay for GPT 3.5? It is free. Only GPT 4 needs a subscription fee, or I think can pay ad-hoc price if you get approved for an OpenAI account that prioritse for developer waiting list. Am I missing something here or I misunderstood?
The ChatGPT playground is free, the OpenAI API, which is what you should be using, is pay-as-you-go. And for a quick article from the gpt-3.5-turbo model you're looking at fractions of a penny in cost.
Why do we need to pay for GPT 3.5? It is free. Only GPT 4 needs a subscription fee, or I think can pay ad-hoc price if you get approved for an OpenAI account that prioritse for developer waiting list. Am I missing something here or I misunderstood?
When you use a application like GSA you need API to use GPT . So you were simply using OPEN AI API to generate those content. CHATGPT is free but not their API.
Yes, you can in a few ways, download articles/content from the API. You have to put 10 dollars on the API to begin which were im from costs 10.64 USD that is for mimimum funding.
This is seperate from the GPT plus for 20 USD a month (though last night something was up with mine) or the free chat GPT which is just chat. No browser or coding help with free I think, I dont use the free but maybe it's changed?
For example, I downloaded (10) 500 world articles on a specified keyword an selected a certain "type" of article and it costed me .04 cents at a fraction on a penny. Compared, to using the leading articles at 12 bucks for a super spun, or even article builder (which still requires a good spinning technique) at a few hundred a year or even writers access which I think was like 50-100 for a similar article. So you can see this VERY much cheaper. And you always have the option to spin but I would use spinnercheif which I love at version 3 and now on 8 or 9 maybe or spinrewriter which I heard is svens suggestion for a good spinner.
Id be happy to send you a super spun article on a certain topic if your interested in educating yourself on how things work you know for testing.
Theres more advanced ways to fill fields using gpts and openai via macros which you can look up in the macro guide. Just hit help in tool bar if you bought GSA. I dont believe the "trial" can show/do it much justice.
Comments
Why do we need to pay for GPT 3.5? It is free. Only GPT 4 needs a subscription fee, or I think can pay ad-hoc price if you get approved for an OpenAI account that prioritse for developer waiting list. Am I missing something here or I misunderstood?
When you use a application like GSA you need API to use GPT . So you were simply using OPEN AI API to generate those content. CHATGPT is free but not their API.
Sure, thank you, send me a DM