Need more Stable & Trusted Keyword difficulty Score

slrana

As I saw, you are trying to add more sources and features to improve these tools. This tool is not getting useful until you figure out a stable Keyword difficulty Score. According to my observation for keyword difficulty, you use metadata like keywords in title, meta, and URL.

Think differently

Here is my thought regarding Keyword Difficulty (KD)

Backlink and content = Global Difficulty

Backlink

• Domain-Level
• Page-Level

Now For Domain Level 

• Domain Age ( more the harder)
• Domain Referrer Link (more the harder)
• Domain Authority ( we can take advantage from Majestic, Moz, or ahrefs)

Now Page Level

• Page Authority ( we can take advantage from Majestic, Moz, or ahrefs)
• No of referring domain

Content Level

• The number of pages is indexed in google
• Word count 
• Keyword density
• Keyword in title
• Keyword in URL
• Keyword in Meta description
• Topic relevancy ( If possible)

You added too many free sources in the details analysis section, and it takes too long to analyze everything. And I believe we don't need that much data, and most people don't even see all of this.

Here is few resources:

https://semscoop.com/keyword-tool

https://www.contentharmony.com/product/keyword-difficulty-reports/

I am also open to discuss if you need more help.

Sven

You sent that in private message already and Im sorry for not replying, I had it open for later review. Now I feel the need/pressure to react.

Anyway, I do my best to improve things, but I have to think as well on the normal user here to not over complicate things. It has to be usable for anyone.

slrana

At least reduce the free resource for analysis because it takes lots of time to collect those data.

Sven

you mean the external calls to get data like OpenPR, Virus-Scan-Results and alike? Yes thats something I will add. Though you can do that already in the filter to not call such data, but it's of course hard to figure out if it's an external site or not right now.

denverfix

slrana said:

As I saw, you are trying to add more sources and features to improve these tools. This tool is not getting useful until you figure out a stable Keyword difficulty Score. According to my observation for keyword difficulty, you use metadata like keywords in title, meta, and URL.

Think differently

Here is my thought regarding Keyword Difficulty (KD)

Backlink and content = Global Difficulty

Backlink

• Domain-Level
• Page-Level

Now For Domain Level 

• Domain Age ( more the harder)
• Domain Referrer Link (more the harder)
• Domain Authority ( we can take advantage from Majestic, Moz, or ahrefs)

Now Page Level

• Page Authority ( we can take advantage from Majestic, Moz, or ahrefs)
• No of referring domain

Content Level

• The number of pages is indexed in google
• Word count 
• Keyword density
• Keyword in title
• Keyword in URL
• Keyword in Meta description
• Topic relevancy ( If possible)

You added too many free sources in the details analysis section, and it takes too long to analyze everything. And I believe we don't need that much data, and most people don't even see all of this.

Here is few resources:

https://semscoop.com/keyword-tool

https://www.contentharmony.com/product/keyword-difficulty-reports/

I am also open to discuss if you need more help.

I agree! I'm running some tests and I really realize that the analysis is not as effective compared to other systems.

Just take a test on the https://semscoop.com/keyword-tool and you will see a significant difference

Sven

well all the metric data you see on that mentioned page is available in ours as well, and a lot more. And ours is actually accurate and not outdated or wrong as on some samples I tried there.