Which method is better? I have a SB license but don't use it. Why? I am OK with SER results I get, for what I do.I have been told, repeatedly, by GSA vets, that SB was made for scraping, specifically, and SER for posting.So SB may, in fact, be faster than SER, when it comes to scraping. HOWEVER, SER does work well at scraping. It may not be as fast, though.You can use the included Footprint Studio module included free with SER to sort the CB scrapes into posting targets SER will recognize. (That list of footprints can be manually expanded by YOU, the user, as well.) You can also feed the scrapes from SB into GSA Platform Identifier. That's a stand-alone program that you can have running alongside SER and CB. You can set up a SER project to work from a directory, and GSA-PI feeding that directory in real-time with matched target platforms it gets from SB.So those are three options I am aware of. I believe option three is probably your best bet, to get the most targets, fastest. Anyone know for sure? Thanks...
@skyking i have been doing this for a few years. when i first started out I let SER do everything. Then I tried SBV1 and had mixed results. Went back to SER to do everything. Then SBv2 released and was a game-changer for me. I use it to scrape every day. An hour usually yields around 300-500k of fresh targets. Watch some of Looplines videos to learn more about SB. He is the king for SB.SER is awesome for what it does best. I just let it do that now. T2 only.For T1 I use RX.Should throw in too that success is not from the tools mentioned here, but from the proxies and captcha services you use. For example on RX, if you use DBC you will only get 50% of the results you get from using 2Captcha.