Skip to content

Identify website multiple times?

andrzejekandrzejek Polska
in Feature Requests
Isnt it a good idea to keep matching engines even if its already matched? 

Comments

  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    I don't know what you mean with it?
  • andrzejekandrzejek Polska
    edited June 2019
    I mean, when GSA got "engine match" this particular website is not going to be matched by other engines, i am correct?
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    no not correct. It tests against every engine and takes the one with the best score (most "page must have" or "url must have" lines match). Thats why you will see some engines having the same content in the "page must have1", "page must have2".... lines.

    Also if one engine fail, it will try the next matching one.
  • andrzejekandrzejek Polska
    Would it be possible to provide a feature that will match into multiple engines? I am curious about results. I had best results setting up 1 project / engine.
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    well it does that already as written above?
  • andrzejekandrzejek Polska
    Sven said:
    well it does that already as written above?
    It tests against every engine and takes the one with the best score

    Exactly. What i meant is:

    1) Engine matches -> Post
    2) Continue matching other engines ->
    3) Engine matches -> Post
    4) Continue matching other engines ->
    5) ...
  • SvenSven www.GSA-Online.de
    hmm not a good idea...that would cause more than one link per site. Thats not what most customers want.
  • andrzejekandrzejek Polska
    edited July 2019
    If that is easy to implement, it could an additional setting, off by default.
    I really seen much much better results 1 engine / project. Another way to achieve that is to automatically (right click -> split) split project into multiple (1 engine / project).

    Or, continue matching other engine only if submission failed / link not found.
Sign In or Register to comment.