HTTP or HTTPS?
Deeeeeeee
the Americas
Good morning/afternoon/night pplz!
I was wondering what the most current info is on using SSL-only sites.
Usually, if the site needs an SSL certificate, it's because pages request user data or there's a cart or something.
But I have read a bit a while back about search engine favoring HTTPS-only sites.
And, I see many new sites (big sites) are HTTPS-only.
Seems unnecessary. But does it help with rankings?
I was wondering what the most current info is on using SSL-only sites.
Usually, if the site needs an SSL certificate, it's because pages request user data or there's a cart or something.
But I have read a bit a while back about search engine favoring HTTPS-only sites.
And, I see many new sites (big sites) are HTTPS-only.
Seems unnecessary. But does it help with rankings?
Comments
All scaremongering and unneccessary. I'm gonna see how long I can do without https, same as when everyone stopped using meta tags and I can outrank sites with no content, no mention of any kewyword other than a meta tag, and all the gurus think I'm stupid for using them. Haha, meh. Just hit #1 a few weeks ago for a keyword that is unrelated to the site but used in a meta. Test test test test, don't listen or read other people's thoughts (me included).
I lose a lot of info in the headers then, no? (referrer, etc) That hasn't changed, has it?
On an established site, I would strongly consider it, and in fact I did migrate a few of my websites from http to https in anticipation of Google labeling sites insecure in Chrome. The sites were small and straightforward to migrate using one of the many guides out there. Google picked up on the change within a week, my traffic never really fluctuated, and I did see a small improvement in rankings, although it's hard to say if it was coincidental.
I'm also not pleased that the search engines and web browsers decided to treat http sites in this way but that's the situation we're given.