Majestic Stats For Sites With GSA Links...

michty6

So I have a link building structure for GSA that is: 

T1 Parasite Pages (manually built) <- T2 GSA Links (DF/C mainly) <- T3 GSA Links

This means I can measure the impact of the GSA links by looking at the parasite page stats.

When I look at them all I see TF/CF stats in the majority like 0/15. 0/20 etc.  It seems that Majestic has recognised these as spammy (this is how they show it in their metrics), so I would guess Google does too.

Anyone else seen similar results?  And what adjustments might I make in GSA to try and improve the TF?

shaun

All that means is you can measure how Majestic feel the post of your T1 is, not how Google do. I have posted similar stuff before but here is a Majestic stat break down of some of my sites. They have no manual links or manually typed articles in their tiers. Most are 100% SER with KM content with a few having a T1 from RX...

Incase you arnt familiar with Market Samurai (dont waste your cash) its the top 10 results and you can see theres other people using similar tactics to me to rank in those keywords.

michty6

So those are the stats for the top 10 for some keywords and sites with TF 0 are ranking?  Interesting...

Anth20

Metrics are BS

shaun

Yea, and its not just TF 0, its mid CF with no TF. By all guides you go out and read people will tell you that it is a sack of crap and although it does indicate spam it is still ranking fine in Google.

antonearn

TF is a metric delivered by a company who recently cut 50% of their entire workforce. They "know" SEO. Never listen to a 3rd part metric.

JD_PMG

@antonearn Think that was actually Moz that cut their workforce but yeah your right wouldn't listen to 3rd party metrics.

antonearn

Oh yeah, true. Moz it was!